Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Exploring Challenges in Deep Learning of Single-Station Ground Motion Records (2403.07569v1)

Published 12 Mar 2024 in eess.SP, cs.CV, and cs.LG

Abstract: Contemporary deep learning models have demonstrated promising results across various applications within seismology and earthquake engineering. These models rely primarily on utilizing ground motion records for tasks such as earthquake event classification, localization, earthquake early warning systems, and structural health monitoring. However, the extent to which these models effectively learn from these complex time-series signals has not been thoroughly analyzed. In this study, our objective is to evaluate the degree to which auxiliary information, such as seismic phase arrival times or seismic station distribution within a network, dominates the process of deep learning from ground motion records, potentially hindering its effectiveness. We perform a hyperparameter search on two deep learning models to assess their effectiveness in deep learning from ground motion records while also examining the impact of auxiliary information on model performance. Experimental results reveal a strong reliance on the highly correlated P and S phase arrival information. Our observations highlight a potential gap in the field, indicating an absence of robust methodologies for deep learning of single-station ground motion recordings independent of any auxiliary information.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Seismic Accelerometers, pages 2504–2519. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015.
  2. Early earthquake detection using batch normalization graph convolutional neural network (bngcnn). Applied Sciences, 12(15), 2022.
  3. Graph neural networks for multivariate time series regression with application to seismic data. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, Aug 2022.
  4. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR ’16, pages 770–778. IEEE, June 2016.
  5. Seismic ground response estimation based on convolutional neural networks (cnn). Applied Sciences, 11(22), 2021.
  6. Rapid prediction of earthquake ground shaking intensity using raw waveform data and a convolutional neural network. Geophysical Journal International, 222(2):1379–1389, 05 2020.
  7. Graph convolution networks for seismic events classification using raw waveform data from multiple stations. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 19:1–5, 2022.
  8. A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Localization of Clustered Earthquakes Based on Multistation Full Waveforms. Seismological Research Letters, 90(2A):510–516, 12 2018.
  9. Real-time classification of earthquake using deep learning. Procedia Computer Science, 140:298–305, 2018. Cyber Physical Systems and Deep Learning Chicago, Illinois November 5-7, 2018.
  10. Temporal convolutional networks: A unified approach to action segmentation. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016 Workshops: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 8-10 and 15-16, 2016, Proceedings, Part III 14, pages 47–54. Springer, 2016.
  11. An Investigation of Rapid Earthquake Characterization Using Single‐Station Waveforms and a Convolutional Neural Network. Seismological Research Letters, 90(2A):517–529, 02 2019.
  12. Bayesian-deep-learning estimation of earthquake location from single-station observations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(11):8211–8224, 2020.
  13. Applications of deep neural networks in exploration seismology: A technical survey. GEOPHYSICS, 89(1):WA95–WA115, 2024.
  14. Earthquake transformer—an attentive deep-learning model for simultaneous earthquake detection and phase picking. Nature Communications, 11(1):3952, Aug 2020.
  15. Stanford earthquake dataset (stead): A global data set of seismic signals for ai. IEEE Access, 7:179464–179476, 2019.
  16. The transformer earthquake alerting model: a new versatile approach to earthquake early warning. Geophysical Journal International, 225(1):646–656, 12 2020.
  17. Discriminating seismic events using 1d and 2d cnns: applications to volcanic and tectonic datasets. Earth, Planets and Space, 74(1):134, Sep 2022.
  18. Seismic phase picking using convolutional networks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(9):7086–7092, 2019.
  19. Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location. Science Advances, 4(2):e1700578, 2018.
  20. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  21. Complex neural networks for estimating epicentral distance, depth, and magnitude of seismic waves. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 19:1–5, 2022.
  22. Deep learning approach for earthquake parameters classification in earthquake early warning system. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 18(7):1293–1297, 2021.
  23. Iqbal H Sarker. Deep learning: a comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions. SN Computer Science, 2(6):420, 2021.
  24. M. P. A. van den Ende and J.-P. Ampuero. Automated seismic source characterization using deep graph neural networks. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(17):e2020GL088690, 2020. e2020GL088690 10.1029/2020GL088690.
  25. Graph-partitioning based convolutional neural network for earthquake detection using a seismic array. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(5):e2020JB020269, 2021. e2020JB020269 2020JB020269.
  26. Deep learning-based average shear wave velocity prediction using accelerometer records. In Proceedings of 2024 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, July 2024.
  27. End-to-end lstm based estimation of volcano event epicenter localization. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 429:107615, 2022.
  28. Locating induced earthquakes with a network of seismic stations in oklahoma via a deep learning method. Scientific Reports, 10(1):1941, Feb 2020.
  29. Real-time earthquake early warning with deep learning: Application to the 2016 m 6.0 central apennines, italy earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(5):2020GL089394, 2021. 2020GL089394 2020GL089394.
  30. Umit Mert Çağlar. Github codebase for this work. https://github.com/caglarmert/mage, 2024. Accessed: 2024-03-11.
  31. Umit Mert Çağlar. Weights and biases (wandb) project report. https://api.wandb.ai/links/caglarmert/rdvjvsyu, 2024. Accessed: 2024-03-11.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Ümit Mert Çağlar (3 papers)
  2. Baris Yilmaz (6 papers)
  3. Melek Türkmen (3 papers)
  4. Erdem Akagündüz (20 papers)
  5. Salih Tileylioglu (4 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com