Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Physics-Guided Abnormal Trajectory Gap Detection (2403.06268v1)

Published 10 Mar 2024 in cs.CV, cs.AI, cs.CG, cs.DB, and cs.LG

Abstract: Given trajectories with gaps (i.e., missing data), we investigate algorithms to identify abnormal gaps in trajectories which occur when a given moving object did not report its location, but other moving objects in the same geographic region periodically did. The problem is important due to its societal applications, such as improving maritime safety and regulatory enforcement for global security concerns such as illegal fishing, illegal oil transfers, and trans-shipments. The problem is challenging due to the difficulty of bounding the possible locations of the moving object during a trajectory gap, and the very high computational cost of detecting gaps in such a large volume of location data. The current literature on anomalous trajectory detection assumes linear interpolation within gaps, which may not be able to detect abnormal gaps since objects within a given region may have traveled away from their shortest path. In preliminary work, we introduced an abnormal gap measure that uses a classical space-time prism model to bound an object's possible movement during the trajectory gap and provided a scalable memoized gap detection algorithm (Memo-AGD). In this paper, we propose a Space Time-Aware Gap Detection (STAGD) approach to leverage space-time indexing and merging of trajectory gaps. We also incorporate a Dynamic Region Merge-based (DRM) approach to efficiently compute gap abnormality scores. We provide theoretical proofs that both algorithms are correct and complete and also provide analysis of asymptotic time complexity. Experimental results on synthetic and real-world maritime trajectory data show that the proposed approach substantially improves computation time over the baseline technique.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (41)
  1. 2020. MarineTraffic. https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/.
  2. Efficient trajectory joins using symbolic representations. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Mobile data management. 86–93.
  3. Petko Bakalov and Vassilis J Tsotras. 2006. Continuous spatiotemporal trajectory joins. In International conference on GeoSensor Networks. Springer, 109–128.
  4. BOEM and NOAA. 2020. MarineCadastre. https://marinecadastre.gov/ais/.
  5. Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 41, 3 (2009), 1–58.
  6. iBOAT: Isolation-based online anomalous trajectory detection. IEEE TIST 14, 2 (2013), 806–818.
  7. Jiahua Chen and Jun Shao. 2001. Jackknife variance estimation for nearest-neighbor imputation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96, 453 (2001), 260–269.
  8. Robust and fast similarity search for moving object trajectories. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. 491–502.
  9. Yun Chen and Jignesh M Patel. 2009. Design and evaluation of trajectory join algorithms. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 266–275.
  10. R. Cheng et al. 2008. Probabilistic verifiers: Evaluating constrained nearest-neighbor queries over uncertain data. In 2008 IEEE 24th ICDE. IEEE, 973–982.
  11. Efficient similarity join of large sets of moving object trajectories. In 2008 15th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning. IEEE, 79–87.
  12. Towards a taxonomy of movement patterns. Information visualization 7, 3-4 (2008), 240–252.
  13. John Fox. 2015. Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Sage Publications.
  14. S Gibbens. 2018. How illegal fishing is being tracked from space. National Geographic (2018).
  15. Bayesian networks for imputation in classification problems. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 29 (2007), 231–252.
  16. Chih-Chieh Hung et al. 2015. Clustering and aggregating clues of trajectories for mining trajectory patterns and routes. The VLDB Journal 24, 2 (2015), 169–192.
  17. Bart Kuijpers and Walied Othman. 2009. Modeling uncertainty of moving objects on road networks via space–time prisms. IJGIS 23, 9 (2009), 1095–1117.
  18. Po-Ruey Lei. 2016. A framework for anomaly detection in maritime trajectory behavior. Knowledge and Information Systems 47, 1 (2016), 189–214.
  19. Milton Lim. 2021. Gauss, Least Squares, and the Missing Planet. https://www.actuaries.digital/2021/03/31/gauss-least-squares-and-the-missing-planet/.
  20. Rake& Agrawal King-lp Lin and Harpreet S Sawhney Kyuseok Shim. 1995. Fast similarity search in the presence of noise, scaling, and translation in time-series databases. In Proceeding of the 21th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. Citeseer, 490–501.
  21. A novel anomaly detection approach to identify intentional AIS on-off switching. Expert Systems with Applications 78 (2017), 110–123.
  22. H. J. Miller. 1991. Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. IJGIS 5, 3 (1991), 287–301.
  23. Vessel pattern knowledge discovery from AIS data: A framework for anomaly detection and route prediction. Entropy 15, 6 (2013), 2218–2245.
  24. D. Pfoser and C. S. Jensen. 1999. Capturing the uncertainty of moving-object representations. In International Symposium on Spatial Databases. Springer, 111–131.
  25. Novel approaches to the indexing of moving object trajectories.. In VLDB. 395–406.
  26. E Rancourt. 1999. Estimation with nearest neighbour imputation at Statistics Canada. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association. 131–138.
  27. Maritime anomaly detection: A review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 8, 5 (2018), e1266.
  28. Trajectory similarity join in spatial networks. (2017).
  29. Understanding covid-19 effects on mobility: A community-engaged approach. AGILE: GIScience Series 3 (2022), 14.
  30. Towards a tighter bound on possible-rendezvous areas: preliminary results. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 1–11.
  31. Abnormal Trajectory-Gap Detection: A Summary (Short Paper). In 15th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2022). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
  32. Spatiotemporal data mining: A Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.12753 (2022).
  33. Arun Sharma and Shashi Shekhar. 2022. Analyzing Trajectory Gaps to Find Possible Rendezvous Region. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 13, 3 (2022), 1–23.
  34. Analyzing Trajectory Gaps for Possible Rendezvous: A Summary of Results. In 11th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2021)-Part I. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
  35. Signature-based trajectory similarity join. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 29, 4 (2017), 870–883.
  36. Goce Trajcevski et al. 2010. Uncertain range queries for necklaces. In 2010 Eleventh International Conference on Mobile Data Management. IEEE, 199–208.
  37. Wikipedia. 2021. Space Shuttle Columbia disaster. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster.
  38. Stephan Winter and Zhang-Cai Yin. 2010. Directed movements in probabilistic time geography. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 24, 9 (2010), 1349–1365.
  39. Efficient retrieval of similar time sequences under time warping. In Proceedings 14th International Conference on Data Engineering. IEEE, 201–208.
  40. Applying frequent-pattern mining and time geography to impute gaps in smartphone-based human-movement data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 35, 11 (2021), 2187–2215.
  41. Yu Zheng. 2015. Trajectory data mining: an overview. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 6, 3 (2015), 1–41.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com