Mid-career pitfall of consecutive success in science (2403.05824v1)
Abstract: The creativity of scientists often manifests as localized hot streaks of significant success. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of these influential phases can enhance the effectiveness of support systems and funding allocation, fostering groundbreaking discoveries worthy of accolades. Historically, analyses have suggested that hot streaks occur randomly over time. However, our research, through meticulous examination, reveals that these phases are not flatly distributed but are more frequent at the early and late stages of scientists' careers. Notably, both early and late hot streaks are marked by dense tie collaborations, with the former typically involving close partnerships with particular authors and the latter being characterized by involvement in large-scale projects compared with single-top or ordinary papers. This pattern indicates that mid-career researchers lack both intimate relations and resources to keep big projects, leading to``mid-career pitfal'' of consecutive success. This insight holds profound implications for the development of policies and initiatives aimed at bolstering innovative research and discovery.
- Lashuel, H. The busy lives of academics have hidden costs—and universities must take better care of their faculty members. \JournalTitleNature Careers Community (2020).
- Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. \JournalTitleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2021636118 (2021).
- Labor advantages drive the greater productivity of faculty at elite universities. \JournalTitleScience Advances 8, eabq7056 (2022).
- Liu, L. et al. Hot streaks in artistic, cultural, and scientific careers. \JournalTitleNature 559, 396–399 (2018).
- Understanding the onset of hot streaks across artistic, cultural, and scientific careers. \JournalTitleNature communications 12, 5392 (2021).
- Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. \JournalTitleScience 354, aaf5239 (2016).
- Age and scientific genius. \JournalTitleThe Wiley handbook of genius 422–450 (2014).
- Gould, J. Muddle of the middle: why mid-career scientists feel neglected (2022).
- Petersen, A. M. Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers. \JournalTitleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, E4671–E4680 (2015).
- Zeng, A. et al. Increasing trend of scientists to switch between topics. \JournalTitleNature communications 10, 3439 (2019).
- Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. \JournalTitleNature 566, 378–382 (2019).
- Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers. \JournalTitleNature communications 10, 5170 (2019).
- Mentorship and protégé success in stem fields. \JournalTitleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 14077–14083 (2020).
- Fresh teams are associated with original and multidisciplinary research. \JournalTitleNature human behaviour 5, 1314–1322 (2021).
- Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas. \JournalTitleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2200841119 (2022).
- Untangling the network effects of productivity and prominence among scientists. \JournalTitleNature communications 13, 4907 (2022).
- Liu, M. et al. Team formation and team impact: The balance between team freshness and repeat collaboration. \JournalTitleJournal of Informetrics 16, 101337 (2022).
- Impactful scientists have higher tendency to involve collaborators in new topics. \JournalTitleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2207436119 (2022).
- Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas. \JournalTitleNature 623, 987–991 (2023).
- Reproducing scientists’ mobility: A data-driven model. \JournalTitleScientific reports 11, 10733 (2021).
- Sabharwal, M. Comparing research productivity across disciplines and career stages. \JournalTitleJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 15, 141–163 (2013).
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Types of grants programs, grants-in-aid for scientific research. https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/e-grants/grants01.html (2024). Accessed: 2024-03-02.
- Oliveira, G. P. et al. Hot streaks in the music industry: identifying and characterizing above-average success periods in artists’ careers. \JournalTitleScientometrics 128, 6029–6046 (2023).
- Quantifying hierarchy and prestige in us ballet academies as social predictors of career success. \JournalTitleScientific Reports 13, 18594 (2023).
- Detecting trends in academic research from a citation network using network representation learning. \JournalTitlePLOS ONE 13, 1–13 (2018).
- Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. \JournalTitleQuantitative Science Studies 1, 377–386 (2020).
- Large-scale analysis of delayed recognition using sleeping beauty and the prince. \JournalTitleApplied Network Science 6, 48 (2021).
- Quantifying progress in research topics across nations. \JournalTitleScientific Reports 13, 4759 (2023).
- Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. \JournalTitleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 17268–17272 (2008).
- Narrow scope for resolution-limit-free community detection. \JournalTitlePhysical Review E 84, 016114 (2011).
- From louvain to leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. \JournalTitleScientific reports 9, 1–12 (2019).
- A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. \JournalTitleJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, 2378–2392 (2012).
- Methods to account for citation inflation in research evaluation. \JournalTitleResearch Policy 48, 1855–1865 (2019).