Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Rediscovering the Mullins Effect With Deep Symbolic Regression (2403.05495v2)

Published 8 Mar 2024 in cs.CE

Abstract: The Mullins effect represents a softening phenomenon observed in rubber-like materials and soft biological tissues. It is usually accompanied by many other inelastic effects like for example residual strain and induced anisotropy. In spite of the long term research and many material models proposed in literature, accurate modeling and prediction of this complex phenomenon still remain a challenging task. In this work, we present a novel approach using deep symbolic regression (DSR) to generate material models describing the Mullins effect in the context of nearly incompressible hyperelastic materials. The two step framework first identifies a strain energy function describing the primary loading. Subsequently, a damage function characterizing the softening behavior under cyclic loading is identified. The efficiency of the proposed approach is demonstrated through benchmark tests using the generalized the Mooney-Rivlin and the Ogden-Roxburgh model. The generalizability and robustness of the presented framework are thoroughly studied. In addition, the proposed methodology is extensively validated on a temperature-dependent data set, which demonstrates its versatile and reliable performance.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. L. Mullins. Softening of Rubber by Deformation. Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 42(1):339–362, 03 1969.
  2. Experimental observation of the deformation induced anisotropy of the mullins effect in rubber. KGK-Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe, 59(3):93–96, 2006.
  3. A new ‘tailor-made’ methodology for the mechanical behaviour analysis of rubber-like materials: Ii. application to the hyperelastic behaviour characterization of a carbon-black filled natural rubber vulcanizate. Polymer, 44(3):821–840, 2003.
  4. J. Plagge and M. Klüppel. Mullins effect revisited: Relaxation, recovery and high-strain damage. Materials Today Communications, 20:100588, 2019.
  5. A pseudo–elastic model for the mullins effect in filled rubber. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 455(1988):2861–2877, 1999.
  6. Constitutive model for stretch-induced softening of the stress–stretch behavior of elastomeric materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 52(10):2187–2205, 2004.
  7. A. Dorfmann and R.W. Ogden. A constitutive model for the mullins effect with permanent set in particle-reinforced rubber. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 41(7):1855–1878, 2004.
  8. A damage directional constitutive model for mullins effect with permanent set and induced anisotropy. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 25(3):483–496, 2006.
  9. A thermodynamically consistent phenomenological model of the anisotropic mullins effect. ZAMM-Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik: Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 90(5):370–386, 2010.
  10. A network evolution model for the anisotropic mullins effect in carbon black filled rubbers. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 46(16):2967–2977, 2009.
  11. An averaging based tube model for deformation induced anisotropic stress softening of filled elastomers. International Journal of Plasticity, 90:96–115, 2017.
  12. Neural Network Based Constitutive Model for Rubber Material. Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 77(2):257–277, 05 2004.
  13. Constitutive artificial neural networks: A fast and general approach to predictive data-driven constitutive modeling by deep learning. Journal of Computational Physics, 429:110010, 2021.
  14. Polyconvex anisotropic hyperelasticity with neural networks. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 159:104703, 2022.
  15. Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive laws. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 381:113852, 2021.
  16. Nn-euclid: Deep-learning hyperelasticity without stress data. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 169:105076, 2022.
  17. Physics-constrained symbolic model discovery for polyconvex incompressible hyperelastic materials. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04286, 2023.
  18. On physics-informed data-driven isotropic and anisotropic constitutive models through probabilistic machine learning and space-filling sampling. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 394:114915, 2022.
  19. A physics-informed assembly of feed-forward neural network engines to predict inelasticity in cross-linked polymers. Polymers, 12(11), 2020.
  20. Symbolic regression via genetic programming. In Proceedings. Vol.1. Sixth Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks, pages 173–178, 2000.
  21. Ai-timoshenko: Automatedly discovering simplified governing equations for applied mechanics problems from simulated data. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 88(10):101006, 2021.
  22. Orbital anomaly reconstruction using deep symbolic regression. In 71st International Astronautical Congress, 2020.
  23. Prediction of stress-strain curves for aluminium alloys using symbolic regression. In AIP Conference Proceedings, volume 2113. AIP Publishing, 2019.
  24. Application of symbolic regression for constitutive modeling of plastic deformation. Applications in Engineering Science, 6:100052, 2021.
  25. Development of interpretable, data-driven plasticity models with symbolic regression. Computers & Structures, 252:106557, 2021.
  26. Establish algebraic data-driven constitutive models for elastic solids with a tensorial sparse symbolic regression method and a hybrid feature selection technique. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 159:104742, 2022.
  27. Automatic generation of interpretable hyperelastic material models by symbolic regression. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 124(9):2093–2104, 2023.
  28. John R Koza. Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection. Statistics and computing, 4:87–112, 1994.
  29. Contemporary symbolic regression methods and their relative performance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.14351, 2021.
  30. Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04871, 2019.
  31. P. J. Flory. Thermodynamic relations for high elastic materials. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 57:829, 1961.
  32. Polyconvexity of generalized polynomial-type hyperelastic strain energy functions for near-incompressibility. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 40(11):2767–2791, 2003.
  33. Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients, 2021.
  34. Allan F. Bower. Applied Mechanics of Solids. CRC Press, 2010.
  35. M. Mooney. A Theory of Large Elastic Deformation. Journal of Applied Physics, 11(9):582–592, sep 1940.
  36. Fitting hyperelastic models to experimental data. Computational Mechanics, 34:484–502, 2004.
  37. C Miehe. Aspects of the formulation and finite element implementation of large strain isotropic elasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 37(12):1981–2004, 1994.
  38. Influence of the temperature on the mechanical behaviour of filled and unfilled silicone rubbers. Polymer Testing, 32(3):492–501, 2013.
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.