Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
134 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
9 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Device Fault Prediction Model based on LSTM and Random Forest (2403.05179v1)

Published 8 Mar 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: The quality of power grid equipment forms the material foundation for the safety of the large power grid. Ensuring the quality of equipment entering the grid is a core task in material management. Currently, the inspection of incoming materials involves the generation of sampling plans, sampling, sealing, sample delivery, and testing. Due to the lack of a comprehensive control system and effective control measures, it is not possible to trace the execution process of business operations afterward. This inability to trace hampers the investigation of testing issues and risk control, as it lacks effective data support. Additionally, a significant amount of original record information for key parameters in the testing process, which is based on sampling operation standards, has not been effectively utilized. To address these issues, we conduct researches on key monitoring technologies in the typical material inspection process based on the Internet of Things (IoT) and analyze the key parameters in inspection results. For purpose of complete the above tasks, this paper investigates the use of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) algorithms for quality prediction in material equipment based on key inspection parameters. In summary, this paper aims to provide professional and reliable quality data support for various business processes within the company, including material procurement, engineering construction, and equipment operation.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. D. W. Durbak, “Surge arrester modeling,” in 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 01CH37194), vol. 2.   IEEE, 2001, pp. 728–730.
  2. B. Ranjbar, A. Darvishi, R. Dashti, and H. R. Shaker, “A survey of diagnostic and condition monitoring of metal oxide surge arrester in the power distribution network,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 21, p. 8091, 2022.
  3. W. S. Castro, I. J. Lopes, S. L. Missé, and J. A. Vasconcelos, “Optimal placement of surge arresters for transmission lines lightning performance improvement,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 202, p. 107583, 2022.
  4. P. Pinceti and M. Giannettoni, “A simplified model for zinc oxide surge arresters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 393–398, 1999.
  5. P. Falcaro, R. Ricco, A. Yazdi, I. Imaz, S. Furukawa, D. Maspoch, R. Ameloot, J. D. Evans, and C. J. Doonan, “Application of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles at mofs,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 307, pp. 237–254, 2016.
  6. A. K. Das, D. Dey, B. Chatterjee, and S. Dalai, “A transfer learning approach to sense the degree of surface pollution for metal oxide surge arrester employing infrared thermal imaging,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 21, no. 15, pp. 16 961–16 968, 2021.
  7. S. Tominaga, K. Azumi, Y. Shibuya, M. Imataki, Y. Fujiwara, and S. Nishida, “Protective performance of metal oxide surge arrester based on the dynamic vi characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, no. 6, pp. 1860–1871, 1979.
  8. R. J. Thomas, “High-impulse current and voltage measurement,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 102–117, 1970.
  9. C. Borges, E. Marques, R. Carbas, C. Ueffing, P. Weißgraeber, and L. d. Silva, “Review on the effect of moisture and contamination on the interfacial properties of adhesive joints,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, vol. 235, no. 3, pp. 527–549, 2021.
  10. J. J. Kester, D. Miller, S. Benna, and B. Steinbrecher, “Multistress aging tests of polymer housed surge arresters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 446–452, 1998.
  11. A. K. Das, S. Dalai, and B. Chatterjee, “A novel approach to estimate the quantity of ingressed moisture content inside metal oxide surge arrester using dielectric modulus technique,” IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2178–2185, 2021.
  12. I. A. Metwally, M. Eladawy, and E. Feilat, “Online condition monitoring of surge arresters based on third-harmonic analysis of leakage current,” IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2274–2281, 2017.
  13. M. Barannik and V. Kolobov, “System for monitoring the condition of metal-oxide surge arresters in service,” in 2020 International Multi-Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies (FarEastCon).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6.
  14. N. Abdullah, M. F. Ariffin, N. M. Hatta, M. F. Nozlan, A. Mohamad, and M. Osman, “Surge arrester monitoring implementation at 33kv distribution overhead line in malaysia,” in 2023 12th Asia-Pacific International Conference on Lightning (APL).   IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–3.
  15. V. Hinrichsen, G. Scholl, M. Schubert, and T. Ostertag, “Online monitoring of high-voltage metal-oxide surge arresters by wireless passive surface acoustic wave (saw) temperature sensors,” in Eleventh International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering, vol. 2.   IET, 1999, pp. 238–241.
  16. J. Lundquist, L. Stenstrom, A. Schei, and B. Hansen, “New method for measurement of the resistive leakage currents of metal-oxide surge arresters in service,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1811–1822, 1990.
  17. X. Cai, J. Shi, X. Chen et al., “A on-line measurement method of leakage current of metal-oxide surge arresters based on mathematical morphology,” High Voltage Apparatus, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 99–102, 2010.
  18. R. Hu, B. Pi, S. Yu, Z. Yao, K. Liu, and J. Li, “Operation status monitoring system for lightning arrester on line,” in International Conference on Meteorology Observations (ICMO).   IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–4.
  19. D.-s. Lee, Y.-T. Chen, and S.-L. Chao, “Universal workflow of artificial intelligence for energy saving,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 1602–1633, 2022.
  20. Y. Yu, X. Si, C. Hu, and J. Zhang, “A review of recurrent neural networks: Lstm cells and network architectures,” Neural computation, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1235–1270, 2019.
  21. K. Smagulova and A. P. James, “A survey on lstm memristive neural network architectures and applications,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics, vol. 228, no. 10, pp. 2313–2324, 2019.
  22. G. Biau and E. Scornet, “A random forest guided tour,” Test, vol. 25, pp. 197–227, 2016.
  23. D. Piccolo, “A distance measure for classifying arima models,” Journal of time series analysis, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 153–164, 1990.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now