Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

DeepSee: Multidimensional Visualizations of Seabed Ecosystems (2403.04761v1)

Published 7 Mar 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Scientists studying deep ocean microbial ecosystems use limited numbers of sediment samples collected from the seafloor to characterize important life-sustaining biogeochemical cycles in the environment. Yet conducting fieldwork to sample these extreme remote environments is both expensive and time consuming, requiring tools that enable scientists to explore the sampling history of field sites and predict where taking new samples is likely to maximize scientific return. We conducted a collaborative, user-centered design study with a team of scientific researchers to develop DeepSee, an interactive data workspace that visualizes 2D and 3D interpolations of biogeochemical and microbial processes in context together with sediment sampling history overlaid on 2D seafloor maps. Based on a field deployment and qualitative interviews, we found that DeepSee increased the scientific return from limited sample sizes, catalyzed new research workflows, reduced long-term costs of sharing data, and supported teamwork and communication between team members with diverse research goals.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (48)
  1. The State of the Art in Visual Analysis Approaches for Ocean and Atmospheric Datasets. Computer Graphics Forum 38, 3 (2019), 881–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13731
  2. SeaVizKit: Interactive Maps for Ocean Visualization. In OCEANS 2019 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23919/OCEANS40490.2019.8962794
  3. Natalia Andrienko and Gennady Andrienko. 2006. Exploratory analysis of spatial and temporal data: a systematic approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
  4. Exploratory spatio-temporal visualization: an analytical review. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 14, 6 (2003), 503–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-926X(03)00046-6 Visual Data Mining.
  5. A Visual Analytics Approach to Debugging Cooperative, Autonomous Multi-Robot Systems’ Worldviews. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST). 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST50239.2020.00008
  6. D33{}^{3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT data-driven documents. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 17, 12 (2011), 2301–2309.
  7. R.E. Boyatzis. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. SAGE Publications.
  8. Biotechnological uses of enzymes from psychrophiles. Microbial Biotechnology 4, 4 (2011), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00258.x
  9. Towards Design Principles for Visual Analytics in Operations Contexts. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173712
  10. Cinzia Corinaldesi. 2015. New perspectives in benthic deep-sea microbial ecology. Frontiers in Marine Science 2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00017
  11. Value-suppressing uncertainty palettes. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.
  12. Challenging the paradigms of deep-sea ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29, 8 (2014), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.06.002
  13. Volume Rendering. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 22, 4 (jun 1988), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1145/378456.378484
  14. Exploring Geovisualization. Exploring Geovisualization (2005), 3.
  15. IRVINE: A Design Study on Analyzing Correlation Patterns of Electrical Engines. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 1 (2022), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114797
  16. Fluid interaction for information visualization. Information Visualization 10, 4 (2011), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611413180
  17. Michael Gleicher. 2018. Considerations for Visualizing Comparison. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (2018), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744199
  18. Creative User-Centered Visualization Design for Energy Analysts and Modelers. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2516–2525. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.145
  19. Astrobiology and the potential for life on Europa. Europa (2009), 589–629.
  20. Charles D Hansen and Chris R Johnson. 2011. Visualization handbook. Elsevier.
  21. JPL/Caltech ArtCenter: Towards a collaborative methodology for interactive scientific data visualization. Information Design Journal 27, 1 (2022), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.22009.hen
  22. Eric Horvitz. 1999. Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA) (CHI ’99). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303030
  23. Visual analysis of uncertainties in ocean forecasts for planning and operation of off-shore structures. In 2013 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificVis.2013.6596144
  24. Ovis: A Framework for Visual Analysisof Ocean Forecast Ensembles. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 8 (2014), 1114–1126. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2307892
  25. Bo Barker Jørgensen and Antje Boetius. 2007. Feast and famine—microbial life in the deep-sea bed. Nature Reviews Microbiology 5, 10 (2007), 770–781.
  26. Visual Analytics for Comparison of Ocean Model Output with Reference Data: Detecting and Analyzing Geophysical Processes Using Clustering Ensembles. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12 (2014), 1893–1902. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346751
  27. Visualization for the Physical Sciences. Computer Graphics Forum 31, 8 (2012), 2317–2347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2012.03184.x
  28. David Lloyd and Jason Dykes. 2011. Human-Centered Approaches in Geovisualization Design: Investigating Multiple Methods Through a Long-Term Case Study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (2011), 2498–2507. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.209
  29. Science Objectives for Flagship-Class Mission Concepts for the Search for Evidence of Life at Enceladus. Astrobiology 22, 6 (2022), 685–712. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2020.2425
  30. Andrew Martin and Andrew McMinn. 2018. Sea ice, extremophiles and life on extra-terrestrial ocean worlds. International Journal of Astrobiology 17, 1 (2018), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550416000483
  31. Enabling new techniques in environmental assessment through multi-sensor hydrography. In OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2016.7761487
  32. Prokaryotic diversity, distribution, and insights into their role in biogeochemical cycling in marine basalts. The ISME Journal 3, 2 (2009), 231–242.
  33. Unlocking user-centered design methods for building cyber security visualizations. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on Visualization for Cyber Security (VizSec). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/VIZSEC.2015.7312771
  34. Kenneth H. Nealson. 1997. SEDIMENT BACTERIA: Who’s There, What Are They Doing, and What’s New? Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 25, 1 (1997), 403–434. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.25.1.403
  35. Yukari Ohta and Yuji Hatada. 2006. A Novel Enzyme, λ𝜆\lambdaitalic_λ-Carrageenase, Isolated from a Deep-Sea Bacterium. The Journal of Biochemistry 140, 4 (10 2006), 475–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvj180
  36. M. A. Oliver and R. Webster. 1990. Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems. International journal of geographical information systems 4, 3 (1990), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799008941549
  37. Centimeter-Scale Mapping of Four Hydrothermal Vent Sites at Axial Seamount: Low-Altitude Surveys Combining Multibeam Sonar, Lidar, and Color Stereo Photography. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2022. Article OS21B-09, OS21B-09 pages.
  38. Discovery of Hydrothermal Vent Fields on Alarcón Rise and in Southern Pescadero Basin, Gulf of California. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 19, 12 (2018), 4788–4819. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007771
  39. Discrete Sibson interpolation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 2 (2006), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2006.27
  40. Sergio Parra. 2021. DeepSEE: A Virtual Window Under the Waves. https://schmidtocean.org/cruise-log-post/deepsee-a-virtual-window-under-the-waves/
  41. Peter Pirolli and Stuart Card. 2005. The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. In Proceedings of international conference on intelligence analysis, Vol. 5. McLean, VA, USA, 2–4.
  42. Reiner Schlitzer. 2022. Ocean data view. (2022).
  43. Design study methodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 18, 12 (2012), 2431–2440.
  44. An Atmospheric Visual Analysis and Exploration System. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 5 (2006), 1157–1164. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2006.117
  45. Microbial communities of Auka hydrothermal sediments shed light on vent biogeography and the evolutionary history of thermophily. The ISME Journal 16, 7 (2022), 1750–1764.
  46. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods 17 (2020), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
  47. Characterization of a recombinant thermostable xylanase from deep-sea thermophilic Geobacillus sp. MT-1 in East Pacific. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 72 (2006), 1210–1216.
  48. Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com