Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
166 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A High-order Nyström-based Scheme Explicitly Enforcing Surface Density Continuity for the Electric Field Integral Equation (2403.04334v1)

Published 7 Mar 2024 in math.NA, cs.NA, and physics.comp-ph

Abstract: This paper introduces an efficient approach for solving the Electric Field Integral Equation (EFIE) with high-order accuracy by explicitly enforcing the continuity of the impressed current densities across boundaries of the surface patch discretization. The integral operator involved is discretized via a Nystr\"om-collocation approach based on Chebyshev polynomial expansion within each patch and a closed quadrature rule is utilized such that the discretization points inside one patch coincide with those inside another patch on the shared boundary of those two patches. The continuity enforcement is achieved by constructing a mapping from those coninciding points to a vector containing unique discretization points used in the GMRES iterative solver. The proposed approach is applied to the scattering of several different geometries including a sphere, a cube, a NURBS model imported from CAD software, and a dipole structure and results are compared with the Magnetic Field Integral Equation (MFIE) and the EFIE without enforcing continuity to illustrate the effectiveness of the approach.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (10)
  1. S. Rao, D. Wilton, and A. Glisson, “Electromagnetic scattering by surfaces of arbitrary shape,” IEEE Transactions on antennas and propagation, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 409–418, 1982.
  2. L. F. Canino, J. J. Ottusch, M. A. Stalzer, J. L. Visher, and S. M. Wandzura, “Numerical solution of the Helmholtz equation in 2D and 3D using a high-order Nyström discretization,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 627–663, Nov. 1998.
  3. O. P. Bruno and E. Garza, “A Chebyshev-based rectangular-polar integral solver for scattering by geometries described by non-overlapping patches,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 421, p. 109740, 2020.
  4. J. Hu, E. Garza, and C. Sideris, “A Chebyshev-based high-order-accurate integral equation solver for Maxwell’s equations,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 5790–5800, 2021.
  5. E. Garza, J. Hu, and C. Sideris, “High-order chebyshev-based nyström methods for electromagnetics,” in 2021 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES).   IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–4.
  6. E. Garza and C. Sideris, “Fast inverse design of 3d nanophotonic devices using boundary integral methods,” ACS Photonics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 824–835, 2022.
  7. J. Hu and C. Sideris, “A high-order-accurate 3d surface integral equation solver for uniaxial anisotropic media,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2023.
  8. S. D. Gedney, “On deriving a locally corrected nystrom scheme from a quadrature sampled moment method,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 2402–2412, 2003.
  9. J. C. Young, Y. Xu, R. J. Adams, and S. D. Gedney, “High-order nyström implementation of an augmented electric field integral equation,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 11, pp. 846–849, 2012.
  10. N. Hendijani, J. Cheng, R. J. Adams, and J. C. Young, “Constrained locally corrected nyström method,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 3111–3121, 2015.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.