Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Error Correction in Dynamical Codes (2403.04163v1)

Published 7 Mar 2024 in quant-ph

Abstract: We ask what is the general framework for a quantum error correcting code that is defined by a sequence of measurements. Recently, there has been much interest in Floquet codes and space-time codes. In this work, we define and study the distance of a dynamical code. This is a subtle concept and difficult to determine: At any given time, the system will be in a subspace which forms a quantum error-correcting code with a given distance, but the full error correction capability of that code may not be available due to the schedule of measurements associated with the code. We address this challenge by developing an algorithm that tracks information we have learned about the error syndromes through the protocol and put that together to determine the distance of a dynamical code, in a non-fault-tolerant context. We use the tools developed for the algorithm to analyze the initialization and masking properties of a generic Floquet code. Further, we look at properties of dynamical codes under the constraint of geometric locality with a view to understand whether the fundamental limitations on logical gates and code parameters imposed by geometric locality for traditional codes can be surpassed in the dynamical paradigm. We find that codes with a limited number of long range connectivity will not allow non-Clifford gates to be implemented with finite depth circuits in the 2D setting.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. “Dynamically Generated Logical Qubits”. Quantum 5, 564 (2021).
  2. “Boundaries for the Honeycomb Code”. Quantum 6, 693 (2022).
  3. Christophe Vuillot. “Planar floquet codes” (2021). arXiv:2110.05348.
  4. “Anyon condensation and the color code” (2022). arXiv:2212.00042.
  5. “Floquet codes with a twist” (2023). arXiv:2306.08027.
  6. “Fault-tolerant hyperbolic floquet quantum error correcting codes” (2023). arXiv:2309.10033.
  7. “Constructions and performance of hyperbolic and semi-hyperbolic floquet codes” (2023). arXiv:2308.03750.
  8. “x𝑥xitalic_x-cube floquet code: A dynamical quantum error correcting code with a subextensive number of logical qubits”. Phys. Rev. B 108, 205116 (2023).
  9. Andreas Bauer. “Topological error correcting processes from fixed-point path integrals” (2023). arXiv:2303.16405.
  10. “Floquet codes without parent subsystem codes”. PRX Quantum 4, 020341 (2023).
  11. “A fault-tolerant honeycomb memory”. Quantum 5, 605 (2021).
  12. “Performance of planar floquet codes with majorana-based qubits”. PRX Quantum 4, 010310 (2023).
  13. “Measurement quantum cellular automata and anomalies in floquet codes” (2023). arXiv:2304.01277.
  14. “Adiabatic paths of Hamiltonians, symmetries of topological order, and automorphism codes”. Physical Review B 106, 085122 (2022).
  15. “Floquet codes and phases in twist-defect networks” (2023). arXiv:2303.17664.
  16. “Transversal switching between generic stabilizer codes” (2018). arXiv:1709.09282.
  17. “Universal transversal gates with color codes - a simplified approach”. Physical Review A 91, 032330 (2015).
  18. “Fault-Tolerant Conversion between the Steane and Reed-Muller Quantum Codes”. Physical Review Letters 113, 080501 (2014).
  19. “Restrictions on Transversal Encoded Quantum Gate Sets”. Physical Review Letters 102, 110502 (2009).
  20. Sergey Bravyi. “Subsystem codes with spatially local generators”. Physical Review A 83, 012320 (2011).
  21. Daniel Gottesman. “Opportunities and challenges in fault-tolerant quantum computation” (2022). arXiv:2210.15844.
  22. “Partial syndrome measurement for hypergraph product codes” (2023). arXiv:2306.17122.
  23. “Spacetime codes of clifford circuits” (2023). arXiv:2304.05943.
  24. “A no-go theorem for a two-dimensional self-correcting quantum memory based on stabilizer codes”. New Journal of Physics 11, 043029 (2009).
  25. “Classification of topologically protected gates for local stabilizer codes”. Physical Review Letters 110, 170503 (2013).
  26. “Fault-tolerant logical gates in quantum error-correcting codes”. Physical Review A 91, 012305 (2015).
  27. Dave Bacon. “Operator quantum error-correcting subsystems for self-correcting quantum memories”. Physical Review A73 (2006).
  28. “Subsystem surface codes with three-qubit check operators” (2013). arXiv:1207.1443.
  29. “Quantum computation from dynamic automorphism codes” (2023). arXiv:2307.10353.
  30. “Tradeoffs for Reliable Quantum Information Storage in 2D Systems”. Physical Review Letters 104, 050503 (2010).
  31. “Improved rate-distance trade-offs for quantum codes with restricted connectivity” (2023). arXiv:2307.03283.
  32. “Doubled color codes” (2015). arXiv:1509.03239.
  33. “Quantifying nonlocality: how outperforming local quantum codes is expensive”. Physical Review Letters 129, 050505 (2022).
Citations (10)

Summary

  • The paper's main contribution is formulating an algorithm to quantify error correction in dynamical quantum codes via evolving measurement sequences.
  • It introduces a framework that differentiates unmasked, temporarily masked, and permanently masked stabilizers, highlighting potential advantages over traditional codes.
  • The efficient O(n^3) algorithm offers practical insights for enhancing fault-tolerant quantum computing by overcoming limitations of static, locally-constrained codes.

Overview of "Error Correction in Dynamical Codes"

The paper "Error Correction in Dynamical Codes" by Xiaozhen Fu and Daniel Gottesman addresses the foundational aspects of quantum error-correcting codes defined by sequences of measurements, with a specific focus on dynamical codes. Motivated by recent advancements in Floquet codes, this work establishes a framework for understanding the distance of a dynamical code, where the distance is inherently tied to the sequence of measurements rather than fixed stabilizer generators. This paper presents an algorithm to assess the error correction capability of a dynamical code, utilizing the sequence to determine the unmasked distance, particularly in a non-fault-tolerant context. This framework is crucial for analyzing Floquet codes and space-time codes, contributing significantly to the theoretical and practical understanding of quantum error correction.

The primary contribution of the paper is formulating an algorithm that provides insights into a crucial aspect of dynamical codes—their ability to manage errors across temporally evolving stabilizer structures. Unlike static codes, a dynamical code's stabilizer group changes as system evolves. The algorithm identifies the unmasked, temporarily masked, and permanently masked stabilizers within a given sequence of measurements, thereby determining the error correcting potential of the code in a specific time frame.

Numerical Results and Strong Claims

A distinctive aspect of the presented algorithm is its classically efficient determination of masking within the code's stabilizer framework. This allows for the calculation of the unmasked distance of dynamical codes. The complexity of the algorithm is mainly contingent on the Zassenhaus algorithm, which requires O(n3)O(n^3) operations, reflecting a controlled computational growth with system size. Such computational efficiency is vital for practical applications involving large quantum systems.

Moreover, the work demonstrates that in specific cases of Floquet codes, the stabilized measurements, when analyzed, reveal that they potentially exceed the performance parameters set by traditional local stabilizer codes. For example, they clarify the possibility that the limitations imposed by geometric locality on logical gates and code parameters for traditional codes might be surpassed in a dynamical framework. This assertion, while subject to further empirical verification, provides an exciting avenue for advancing fault-tolerant quantum computation.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

From a theoretical standpoint, this research broadens the existing quantum error correction paradigms by generalizing the notion of distance in quantum codes. By focusing on the temporal aspect of measurements, the paper implies that code design could be more flexible, facilitating a broader class of dynamical codes. This flexibility could imply more sophisticated error correction mechanisms that leverage evolving quantum state properties over fixed stabilizer codes.

Practically, the notion of dynamical codes provides a mechanism for engineering quantum codes, potentially leading to more effective quantum error-correcting protocols. In particular, understanding and utilizing the dynamically augmented coding strategy could result in enhanced error thresholds and more resilient logical qubit implementations. The findings might influence the development of more complex quantum systems where measurement and feedback occur in rapid succession, such as those found in real-time quantum computing environments.

Speculation on Future Developments

Future research could further explore the impact of measurement schemes and algorithms on achieving fault-tolerant thresholds in real-world quantum computing settings, particularly where unitary operations introduce complexities unaddressed by current models. The extension of the algorithm to incorporate measurement errors is another significant development area, allowing for comprehensive handling of errors in both measurements and quantum states. Additionally, embedding the theoretical advancements of dynamical codes into physical quantum computers could open pathways to pioneering error correction techniques, fundamentally enhancing the robustness of quantum systems against decoherence.

In summary, this paper articulates a sophisticated view that dynamical codes might hold the key to overcoming some classical limitations of quantum error correction. This research advances the theoretical understanding of error patterns in quantum systems that evolve with time, thus laying the foundation for potentially transformative developments in quantum information science.