Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Polynomial Calculus sizes over the Boolean and Fourier bases are incomparable (2403.03933v3)

Published 6 Mar 2024 in cs.CC and math.LO

Abstract: For every $n >0$, we show the existence of a CNF tautology over $O(n2)$ variables of width $O(\log n)$ such that it has a Polynomial Calculus Resolution refutation over ${0,1}$ variables of size $O(n3polylog(n))$ but any Polynomial Calculus refutation over ${+1,-1}$ variables requires size $2{\Omega(n)}$. This shows that Polynomial Calculus sizes over the ${0,1}$ and ${+1,-1}$ bases are incomparable (since Tseitin tautologies show a separation in the other direction) and answers an open problem posed by Sokolov [Sok20] and Razborov.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. Lower bounds for Polynomial Calculus: Non-binomial case. In 42nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2001, 14-17 October 2001, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, pages 190–199. IEEE Computer Society, 2001.
  2. Optimality of size-width tradeoffs for resolution. computational complexity, 10:261–276, 2001.
  3. Linear gaps between degrees for the Polynomial Calculus modulo distinct primes. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 62(2):267–289, 2001.
  4. Using the Groebner basis algorithm to find proofs of unsatisfiability. In Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 174–183, 1996.
  5. New lower bounds for polynomial calculus over non-boolean bases. Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex., TR23-132, 2023.
  6. The power of negative reasoning. In 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2021). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2021.
  7. Optimality of size-degree tradeoffs for Polynomial Calculus. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL), 12(1):1–22, 2010.
  8. The surprising power of constant depth algebraic proofs. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pages 591–603, 2020.
  9. Lower bounds for Polynomial Calculus with extension variables over finite fields. In 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2023.
  10. Lower bounds for the Polynomial Calculus and the Gröbner basis algorithm. Computational Complexity, 8:127–144, 1999.
  11. Balakrishnan Krishnamurthy. Short proofs for tricky formulas. Acta informatica, 22:253–275, 1985.
  12. A generalized method for proving Polynomial Calculus degree lower bounds. In 30th Conference on Computational Complexity, CCC 2015, volume 33 of LIPIcs, pages 467–487, 2015.
  13. Alexander Razborov. Alexander razborov: Pedagogical. http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/∼similar-to\sim∼razborov/teaching/.
  14. Alexander A Razborov. Lower bounds for the Polynomial Calculus. Computational Complexity, 7:291–324, 1998.
  15. Dmitry Sokolov. (Semi)Algebraic proofs over {{\{{±plus-or-minus\pm±1}}\}} variables. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 78–90, 2020.
  16. Gunnar Stålmarck. Short resolution proofs for a sequence of tricky formulas. Acta Informatica, 33:277–280, 1996.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.