Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Online Photon Guiding with 3D Gaussians for Caustics Rendering (2403.03641v2)

Published 6 Mar 2024 in cs.GR

Abstract: In production rendering systems, caustics are typically rendered via photon mapping and gathering, a process often hindered by insufficient photon density. In this paper, we propose a novel photon guiding method to improve the photon density and overall quality for caustic rendering. The key insight of our approach is the application of a global 3D Gaussian mixture model, used in conjunction with an adaptive light sampler. This combination effectively guides photon emission in expansive 3D scenes with multiple light sources. By employing a global 3D Gaussian mixture, our method precisely models the distribution of the points of interest. To sample emission directions from the distribution at any observation point, we introduce a novel directional transform of the 3D Gaussian, which ensures accurate photon emission guiding. Furthermore, our method integrates a global light cluster tree, which models the contribution distribution of light sources to the image, facilitating effective light source selection. We conduct experiments demonstrating that our approach robustly outperforms existing photon guiding techniques across a variety of scenarios, significantly advancing the quality of caustic rendering.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. Milton Abramowitz and Irene A. Stegun. 1964. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Dover Publications, New York.
  2. The Design and Evolution of Disney’s Hyperion Renderer. ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 3, Article 33 (jul 2018), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3182159
  3. Path Guiding Using Spatio‐Directional Mixture Models. Computer Graphics Forum (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14428
  4. Path Tracing in Production: The Path of Water. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Courses (SIGGRAPH ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 66 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3587423.3595519
  5. Light Transport Simulation with Vertex Connection and Merging. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 6, Article 192 (nov 2012), 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2366145.2366211
  6. Efficient Caustic Rendering with Lightweight Photon Mapping. Computer Graphics Forum 37, 4 (2018), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13481 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.13481
  7. Toshiya Hachisuka and Henrik Wann Jensen. 2009. Stochastic Progressive Photon Mapping. In ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2009 Papers (Yokohama, Japan) (SIGGRAPH Asia ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 141, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1661412.1618487
  8. Toshiya Hachisuka and Henrik Wann Jensen. 2011. Robust Adaptive Photon Tracing Using Photon Path Visibility. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 5, Article 114 (oct 2011), 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2019627.2019633
  9. Progressive photon mapping. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 5, Article 130 (dec 2008), 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1409060.1409083
  10. Online Neural Path Guiding with Normalized Anisotropic Spherical Gaussians. arXiv:2303.08064 [cs.CV]
  11. Henrik Wann Jensen. 1995. Importance Driven Path Tracing using the Photon Map. In Rendering Techniques ’95, Patrick M. Hanrahan and Werner Purgathofer (Eds.). Springer Vienna, Vienna, 326–335.
  12. Henrik Wann Jensen. 1996. Global illumination using photon maps. In Rendering Techniques’ 96: Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop in Porto, Portugal, June 17–19, 1996 7. Springer, 21–30.
  13. A Simple and Robust Mutation Strategy for the Metropolis Light Transport Algorithm. Computer Graphics Forum 21, 3 (2002), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8659.t01-1-00703 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-8659.t01-1-00703
  14. Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. CoRR abs/1412.6980 (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980
  15. Unbiased and Consistent Rendering Using Biased Estimators. ACM Trans. Graph. 41, 4, Article 48 (jul 2022), 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3528223.3530160
  16. Practical Path Guiding for Efficient Light-Transport Simulation. Comput. Graph. Forum 36, 4 (jul 2017), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13227
  17. Neural Importance Sampling. ACM Trans. Graph. 38, 5, Article 145 (oct 2019), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341156
  18. Michael Oren and Shree K. Nayar. 1994. Generalization of Lambert’s reflectance model. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH ’94). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1145/192161.192213
  19. Variance-Aware Path Guiding. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 4, Article 151 (jul 2020), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386569.3392441
  20. Robust Fitting of Parallax-Aware Mixtures for Path Guiding. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 4, Article 147 (aug 2020), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386569.3392421
  21. T. S. Trowbridge and K. P. Reitz. 1975. Average irregularity representation of a rough surface for ray reflection. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65, 5 (May 1975), 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.65.000531
  22. Eric Veach and Leonidas J. Guibas. 1997. Metropolis light transport. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH ’97). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., USA, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/258734.258775
  23. On-Line Learning of Parametric Mixture Models for Light Transport Simulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4, Article 101 (jul 2014), 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601097.2601203
  24. Lightcuts: a scalable approach to illumination. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3 (jul 2005), 1098–1107. https://doi.org/10.1145/1073204.1073318
  25. Learning to Cluster for Rendering with Many Lights. ACM Trans. Graph. 40, 6, Article 277 (dec 2021), 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478513.3480561
  26. Cem Yuksel. 2020. Stochastic Lightcuts for Sampling Many Lights. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2020), 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3001271
  27. LuisaRender: A High-Performance Rendering Framework with Layered and Unified Interfaces on Stream Architectures. ACM Trans. Graph. 41, 6, Article 232 (nov 2022), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3550454.3555463
  28. Deep Kernel Density Estimation for Photon Mapping. Computer Graphics Forum 39, 4 (2020), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14052 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.14052
  29. Martin Šik and Jaroslav Krivánek. 2019. Implementing One-Click Caustics in Corona Renderer. In Eurographics Symposium on Rendering - DL-only and Industry Track, Tamy Boubekeur and Pradeep Sen (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/sr.20191221

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel photon guiding approach using 3D Gaussian mixtures to accurately model photon emission distributions for superior caustics rendering.
  • It integrates a unique directional transform and adaptive light sampling, significantly reducing mean square error and enhancing image quality.
  • The method improves efficiency in production rendering systems by optimizing light source contributions and paving the way for future path guiding advancements.

Online Photon Guiding with 3D Gaussians for Caustics Rendering

The paper presents an advanced photon guiding technique specifically designed for high-quality caustic rendering in production rendering systems. The proposed method hinges on the innovative application of 3D Gaussian mixtures to improve photon density and image quality. This strategy addresses inherent challenges in photon mapping by mitigating the often insufficient photon density in expansive scenes, particularly those with diverse light sources.

The authors introduce a novel photon guiding approach that utilizes 3D Gaussian mixtures coupled with an adaptive light sampler. This combination ensures efficient photon emission guidance across complex 3D environments. The 3D Gaussian mixture, applied individually to each light source, models the spatial distribution of interest for photon emissions with greater precision. Crucially, the paper details a unique directional transform of the 3D Gaussian, developed to facilitate accurate photon emission, which enhances the photon density where caustics are visually prominent.

To further bolster the rendering efficacy, the researchers propose an innovative scene-geometry-based initialization technique, which substantially accelerates optimization processes. The incorporation of a global light cluster tree models light source contributions more effectively, optimizing light source selection and improving rendering performance.

Quantitative experiments reveal that this method consistently surpasses existing photon guiding techniques across various scenarios, demonstrating its robust performance. The framework significantly advances caustic rendering capabilities by achieving higher photon densities in visible regions with minimal computational overhead.

Numerical Results and Implications

The experiments conducted highlight the method’s superior performance. When compared with traditional methods such as 2D histograms and 3D von Mises-Fisher distributions, the new approach using 3D Gaussian mixtures achieves notable improvements in mean square error (MSE) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM), showcasing its ability to produce images with fewer errors and superior visual quality. For instance, across different test scenes, the proposed method often records MSE values an order of magnitude lower than those from competing approaches.

The implications of this research are twofold. Practically, the enhanced photon guiding framework could be directly integrated into production-level rendering engines, leading to more efficient and visually accurate renderings, especially in scenes with complex caustics. Theoretically, the introduction of 3D Gaussian mixtures and the novel directional transform as a model for photon emission paves the way for future exploration into path guiding and related graphical computations.

Future Directions

Future developments envisioned by the authors include extending the method to support cosine-weighted guiding for emission directions and exploring hybrid techniques that combine path guiding for indirect lighting. Another potential avenue could be further refining the algorithm to accommodate complex multi-lobe BSDF materials, which are prevalent in photorealistic rendering tasks. Enhanced adaptability to such models could amplify the applicability of this technique across more diverse rendering scenarios.

The paper represents a solid advancement in the field of computer graphics, offering a robust solution for one of the most intricate aspects of realistic rendering—caustics—while also indicating fertile ground for continuing research and development.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com