Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Ultralight vector dark matter search using data from the KAGRA O3GK run (2403.03004v1)

Published 5 Mar 2024 in astro-ph.CO, gr-qc, and hep-ph

Abstract: Among the various candidates for dark matter (DM), ultralight vector DM can be probed by laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors through the measurement of oscillating length changes in the arm cavities. In this context, KAGRA has a unique feature due to differing compositions of its mirrors, enhancing the signal of vector DM in the length change in the auxiliary channels. Here we present the result of a search for $U(1){B-L}$ gauge boson DM using the KAGRA data from auxiliary length channels during the first joint observation run together with GEO600. By applying our search pipeline, which takes into account the stochastic nature of ultralight DM, upper bounds on the coupling strength between the $U(1){B-L}$ gauge boson and ordinary matter are obtained for a range of DM masses. While our constraints are less stringent than those derived from previous experiments, this study demonstrates the applicability of our method to the lower-mass vector DM search, which is made difficult in this measurement by the short observation time compared to the auto-correlation time scale of DM.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. A. L. Miller et al., Phys. Rev. D 103, 103002 (2021), arXiv:2010.01925 [astro-ph.IM] .
  2. A. L. Miller and L. Mendes, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063015 (2023), arXiv:2301.08736 [gr-qc] .
  3. J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific), Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc] .
  4. M. Tse et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231107 (2019).
  5. A. Buikema et al. (aLIGO), Phys. Rev. D 102, 062003 (2020), arXiv:2008.01301 [astro-ph.IM] .
  6. F. Acernese et al. (VIRGO), Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc] .
  7. F. Acernese et al. (Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231108 (2019).
  8. P. Touboul et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 231101 (2017), arXiv:1712.01176 [astro-ph.IM] .
  9. P. Fayet, Phys. Rev. D 97, 055039 (2018), arXiv:1712.00856 [hep-ph] .
  10. H. Luck et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 228, 012012 (2010), arXiv:1004.0339 [gr-qc] .
  11. K. L. Dooley et al., Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 075009 (2016), arXiv:1510.00317 [physics.ins-det] .
  12. K. Somiya (KAGRA), Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 124007 (2012), arXiv:1111.7185 [gr-qc] .
  13. T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA), PTEP 2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det] .
  14. H. Abe et al. (KAGRA), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.  (2022), 10.1093/ptep/ptac093, arXiv:2203.07011 [astro-ph.IM] .
  15. T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA collaboration), Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2021, 05A101 (2020), https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article-pdf/2021/5/05A101/37974994/ptaa125.pdf .
  16. P. R. Brady and T. Creighton, Phys. Rev. D 61, 082001 (2000).
  17. K. Riles, Living Rev. Rel. 26, 3 (2023), arXiv:2206.06447 [astro-ph.HE] .
  18. K. Wette, Astropart. Phys. 153, 102880 (2023), arXiv:2305.07106 [gr-qc] .
  19. B. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. D 72, 102004 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0508065 .
  20. LVK, “O3GK KAGRA auxiliary length data release,” https://gwosc.org/data/ (in preparation).
  21. J. Kume et al., “Unknown lines in MICH/PRCL data of KAGRA O3GK,” LIGO-L2300092 (2023), https://dcc.ligo.org/L2300092/public.
Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com