Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
120 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Algorithms in a Superposition of Spacetimes (2403.02937v3)

Published 5 Mar 2024 in quant-ph and cs.CC

Abstract: Quantum computers are expected to revolutionize our ability to process information. The advancement from classical to quantum computing is a product of our advancement from classical to quantum physics -- the more our understanding of the universe grows, so does our ability to use it for computation. A natural question that arises is, what will physics allow in the future? Can more advanced theories of physics increase our computational power, beyond quantum computing? An active field of research in physics studies theoretical phenomena outside the scope of explainable quantum mechanics, that form when attempting to combine Quantum Mechanics (QM) with General Relativity (GR) into a unified theory of Quantum Gravity (QG). QG is known to present the possibility of a quantum superposition of causal structure and event orderings. In the literature of quantum information theory, this translates to a superposition of unitary evolution orders. In this work we show a first example of a natural computational model based on QG, that provides an exponential speedup over standard quantum computation (under standard hardness assumptions). We define a model and complexity measure for a quantum computer that has the ability to generate a superposition of unitary evolution orders, and show that such computer is able to solve in polynomial time two of the fundamental problems in computer science: The Graph Isomorphism Problem ($\mathsf{GI}$) and the Gap Closest Vector Problem ($\mathsf{GapCVP}$), with gap $O\left( n \sqrt{n} \right)$. These problems are believed by experts to be hard to solve for a regular quantum computer. Interestingly, our model does not seem overpowered, and we found no obvious way to solve entire complexity classes that are considered hard in computer science, like the classes $\mathbf{NP}$ and $\mathbf{SZK}$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. Abhay Ashtekar. Large quantum gravity effects: Unforeseen limitations of the classical theory. Physical review letters, 77(24):4864, 1996.
  2. Adiabatic quantum state generation and statistical zero knowledge. In Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 20–29, 2003.
  3. Stabilization of quantum computations by symmetrization. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26(5):1541–1557, 1997.
  4. Quantum fingerprinting. Physical Review Letters, 87(16):167902, 2001.
  5. Manabendra N Bera. Quantifying superpositions of quantum evolutions. Physical Review A, 100(4):042307, 2019.
  6. Spin entanglement witness for quantum gravity. Physical review letters, 119(24):240401, 2017.
  7. Časlav Brukner. Quantum causality. Nature Physics, 10(4):259–263, 2014.
  8. Quantum superposition of massive objects and the quantization of gravity. Physical Review D, 98(12):126009, 2018.
  9. Information content of the gravitational field of a quantum superposition. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 28(14):1943001, 2019.
  10. Quantum computations without definite causal structure. Physical Review A, 88(2):022318, 2013.
  11. Normal approximation by Stein’s method. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
  12. Fabio Costa. A no-go theorem for superpositions of causal orders. Quantum, 6:663, 2022.
  13. On the possibility of laboratory evidence for quantum superposition of geometries. Physics Letters B, 792:64–68, 2019.
  14. Frontiers of quantum gravity: shared challenges, converging directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.10618, 2022.
  15. Lajos Diosi. A universal master equation for the gravitational violation of quantum mechanics. Physics letters A, 120(8):377–381, 1987.
  16. Lajos Diósi. Models for universal reduction of macroscopic quantum fluctuations. Physical Review A, 40(3):1165, 1989.
  17. Lajos Diosi. Gravitation and quantummechanical localization of macroobjects. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.0201, 2014.
  18. Gravitationally mediated entanglement: Newtonian field versus gravitons. Physical Review D, 105(8):086001, 2022.
  19. Statistical tables for biological, agricultural, and medical research. Hafner Publishing Company, 1953.
  20. Einstein’s equivalence principle for superpositions of gravitational fields and quantum reference frames. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.13754, 2020.
  21. Quantum superposition of spacetimes obeys einstein’s equivalence principle. AVS Quantum Science, 4(1), 2022.
  22. Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames. Nature communications, 10(1):494, 2019.
  23. On the limits of non-approximability of lattice problems. In Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 1–9, 1998.
  24. Flaminia Giacomini. Spacetime quantum reference frames and superpositions of proper times. Quantum, 5:508, 2021.
  25. Proofs that yield nothing but their validity or all languages in np have zero-knowledge proof systems. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 38(3):690–728, 1991.
  26. Trapdoors for hard lattices and new cryptographic constructions. In Proceedings of the fortieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 197–206, 2008.
  27. Lucien Hardy. Probability theories with dynamic causal structure: a new framework for quantum gravity. arXiv preprint gr-qc/0509120, 2005.
  28. Lucien Hardy. Towards quantum gravity: a framework for probabilistic theories with non-fixed causal structure. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 40(12):3081, 2007.
  29. A Yu Kitaev. Quantum measurements and the abelian stabilizer problem. arXiv preprint quant-ph/9511026, 1995.
  30. Towards a formulation of quantum theory as a causally neutral theory of bayesian inference. Physical Review A, 88(5):052130, 2013.
  31. Quantum gravity computers: On the theory of computation with indefinite causal structure. Quantum reality, relativistic causality, and closing the epistemic circle: essays in honour of Abner Shimony, pages 379–401, 2009.
  32. Trapdoors for lattices: Simpler, tighter, faster, smaller. In Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, pages 700–718. Springer, 2012.
  33. Gravitationally induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity. Physical review letters, 119(24):240402, 2017.
  34. Exact quantum fourier transforms and discrete logarithm algorithms. International Journal of Quantum Information, 2(01):91–100, 2004.
  35. Quantum correlations with no causal order. Nature communications, 3(1):1092, 2012.
  36. Chris Peikert. An efficient and parallel gaussian sampler for lattices. In Annual Cryptology Conference, pages 80–97. Springer, 2010.
  37. Roger Penrose. On gravity’s role in quantum state reduction. General relativity and gravitation, 28:581–600, 1996.
  38. Oded Regev. On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 56(6):1–40, 2009.
  39. Thomas Prest-Thomas Ricosset-Mélissa Rossi. Simple, fast and constant-time gaussian sampling over the integers for falcon. 2019.
  40. Peter W Shor. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM review, 41(2):303–332, 1999.
  41. Quantum uncertainty of gravitational field and entanglement in superposed massive particles. Physical Review D, 108(10):105019, 2023.
  42. A complete problem for statistical zero knowledge. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 50(2):196–249, 2003.
  43. Bell’s theorem for temporal order. Nature communications, 10(1):3772, 2019.

Summary

  • The paper defines a new computational model that leverages a superposition of spacetime geometries to achieve polynomial-time solutions for GI and GapCVP.
  • It introduces the Order Interference (OI) oracle, enabling a superposition of unitary execution orders to significantly boost quantum computational power.
  • The findings challenge traditional quantum limits and suggest that principles from quantum gravity can drive future advances in solving complex computational problems.

Quantum Algorithms in a Superposition of Spacetimes: An Analysis

This paper explores a novel computational model inspired by theories of quantum gravity, particularly focused on the superposition of spacetime geometries. The authors aim to decipher whether advanced theories from physics could not only enhance quantum computing but propel computation beyond the conventional limits set by current quantum computers.

Key Findings and Results

The core contribution of the paper is the definition of a unique computational model that leverages the concept of a superposition of event orders, grounded in quantum gravity principles. The paper builds upon the idea that a superposition of spacetime geometries could lead to a superposition of event orders, directly affecting computational processes. The suggested model, termed computable order interference, offers a substantial potential speedup over standard quantum computation, under typical complexity assumptions.

Specifically, the paper shows that this new model can solve the Graph Isomorphism Problem (GI) and the Gap Closest Vector Problem (GapCVP) in polynomial time, which are both considered difficult for traditional quantum computers. Notably, the model achieves this by allowing quantum computers to perform a superposition of unitary execution orders, enhancing their computational power.

Computational Implications

The implications of introducing quantum gravitational correlations, without necessarily inducing entanglement, are significant. The paper proposes a computational model that makes pragmatic use of these correlations to amplify the functional capability of quantum systems. This approach is depicted using the Order Interference (OI) oracle, which enables a quantum computer to handle unitary orders and choices more efficiently, potentially solving prominent problems in polynomial time that are typically deemed hard.

The reduction techniques introduced, particularly from fundamental problems like GI and GapCVP to Sequentially Invertible Statistical Difference Problem (SISD), open up new avenues in computational complexity theory. This signifies a potential paradigm shift in how quantum computations could be structured, leveraging the findings from quantum gravity studies.

Theoretical and Future Implications

The theoretical framework suggested in this paper also raises questions about the inherent limits of computational barriers posed by classical and quantum mechanics. While the current model does not overtly simplify NP-complete problems or entire complexity classes such as SZK, it stretches the known boundaries of quantum computational models and invites further research into the capabilities of quantum computers in handling computational complexity.

This work prompts a reevaluation of the interrelation between advanced quantum theories and computational practice. It suggests an iterative process where insights from theoretical physics could continually reshape computational methods, particularly with quantum gravity’s unknowns potentially harboring untapped computational advancements.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this paper offers a compelling examination of how concepts from quantum gravity could be translated into practical computational models. While showcasing how a superposition of unitary orders transforms quantum computation, it bridges theoretical physics and computer science, suggesting new realms of efficiency and complexity reduction. The advancement prompts further exploration into the synthesis of physical theories and computation, with a focus on potentially redefining what is computationally feasible in a quantum-enhanced future.