A Novel Shortest Path Query Algorithm Based on Optimized Adaptive Topology Structure (2403.01826v1)
Abstract: Urban rail transit is a fundamental component of public transportation, however, commonly station-based path search algorithms often overlook the impact of transfer times on search results, leading to decreased accuracy. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a novel shortest path query algorithm based on adaptive topology optimization called the Adaptive Topology Extension Road Network Structure (ATEN). This algorithm categorizes transfer stations into different types and treats travel time and transfer time equivalently as weights for edges in the topological graph. The proposed algorithm introduces virtual stations to differentiate between pedestrian paths and train paths, eliminating the need for additional operations on transfer stations. The algorithm controls the extent of expansion in the urban rail transit topology, overcoming query errors caused by mishandling of transfer stations in the existing algorithm. Finally, a series of simulation experiments were conducted on Beijing's urban rail transit network to validate both correctness and efficiency of the proposed adaptive topology optimization algorithm. The results demonstrate significant advantages compared to existing similar algorithms.
- L. Jiao, F. Wu, Y. Zhu, Q. Luo, F. Luo, and Y. Zhang, “Research on the coupling coordination relationship between urban rail transit system and sustainable urban development,” Systems, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 110, 2022.
- L. Yan, N. Si-Rui, G. Yue, Z. Cai-Hua, and L. Duo, “Detection and analysis of transfer time in urban rail transit system using wifi data,” Transportation Letters, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 634–644, 2023.
- J. Zhao, J. Liu, L. Yang, B. Ai, and S. Ni, “Future 5g-oriented system for urban rail transit: Opportunities and challenges,” China Communications, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2021.
- W. Jang, “Travel time and transfer analysis using transit smart card data,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2144, no. 1, pp. 142–149, 2010.
- A. Bozyiğit, G. Alankuş, and E. Nasiboğlu, “Public transport route planning: Modified dijkstra’s algorithm,” in 2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK). IEEE, 2017, pp. 502–505.
- R. W. Floyd, “Algorithm 97: shortest path,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 5, no. 6, p. 345, 1962.
- P. E. Hart, N. J. Nilsson, and B. Raphael, “A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths,” IEEE transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 100–107, 1968.
- Y. Chen, “Application of improved dijkstra algorithm in coastal tourism route planning,” Journal of Coastal Research, vol. 106, no. SI, pp. 251–254, 2020.
- I. A. Alashoury and M. A. Amarif, “A web application for typical shortest path of roads networks based on an improved dijkstra algorithm,” Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences, vol. 18, no. 4, 2019.
- D. Di Caprio, A. Ebrahimnejad, H. Alrezaamiri, and F. J. Santos-Arteaga, “A novel ant colony algorithm for solving shortest path problems with fuzzy arc weights,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 3403–3415, 2022.
- L. Ahmed, C. Mumford, and A. Kheiri, “Solving urban transit route design problem using selection hyper-heuristics,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 274, no. 2, pp. 545–559, 2019.
- Y. Zhou, H. Yang, Y. Wang, and X. Yan, “Integrated line configuration and frequency determination with passenger path assignment in urban rail transit networks,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 145, pp. 134–151, 2021.
- R. Guo, W. Zhang, W. Guan, and B. Ran, “Time-dependent urban customized bus routing with path flexibility,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2381–2390, 2020.
- L. Deng, J. Zeng, and H. Mei, “Passenger flow pushing assignment method for an urban rail network based on hierarchical path and line decomposition,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 22, p. 6441, 2019.
- F. Meng, L. Yang, Y. Wei, S. Li, Z. Gao, and J. Shi, “Collaborative passenger flow control on an oversaturated metro line: a path choice approach,” Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 376–404, 2020.
- C. Lin, G. Han, J. Du, T. Xu, L. Shu, and Z. Lv, “Spatiotemporal congestion-aware path planning toward intelligent transportation systems in software-defined smart city iot,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 8012–8024, 2020.
- H. Gao, W. Huang, and X. Yang, “Applying probabilistic model checking to path planning in an intelligent transportation system using mobility trajectories and their statistical data.” Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, vol. 25, no. 3, 2019.
- Q. Song, Q. Zhao, S. Wang, Q. Liu, and X. Chen, “Dynamic path planning for unmanned vehicles based on fuzzy logic and improved ant colony optimization,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 62 107–62 115, 2020.
- J. V. Shirabayashi, A. Yamakami, R. C. Silva, and W. V. I. Shirabayashi, “Urban transport and traffic systems: An approach to the shortest path problem and network flow through colored graphs,” Smart and Digital Cities: From Computational Intelligence to Applied Social Sciences, pp. 23–43, 2019.
- Y. Hao, B. Si, and C. Zhao, “A novel shortest path algorithm with topology transformation for urban rail transit network,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 169, p. 108223, 2022.
- E. W. Dijkstra, “A note on two problems in connexion with graphs,” in Edsger Wybe Dijkstra: His Life, Work, and Legacy, 2022, pp. 287–290.
- H. I. Kang, B. Lee, and K. Kim, “Path planning algorithm using the particle swarm optimization and the improved dijkstra algorithm,” in 2008 IEEE Pacific-Asia Workshop on Computational Intelligence and Industrial Application, vol. 2. IEEE, 2008, pp. 1002–1004.
- M. Luo, X. Hou, and J. Yang, “Surface optimal path planning using an extended dijkstra algorithm,” Ieee Access, vol. 8, pp. 147 827–147 838, 2020.
- D. Fan and P. Shi, “Improvement of dijkstra’s algorithm and its application in route planning,” in 2010 seventh international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery, vol. 4. IEEE, 2010, pp. 1901–1904.
- J. Tang, Q. Sun, and Z. Chen, “A new implementation of dijkstra’s algorithm on urban rail transit network,” in 2016 International Conference on Civil, Transportation and Environment. Atlantis Press, 2016, pp. 507–513.
- D. Verma, D. Messon, M. Rastogi, and A. Singh, “Comparative study of various approaches of dijkstra algorithm,” in 2021 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS). IEEE, 2021, pp. 328–336.
- L. Wenzheng, L. Junjun, and Y. Shunli, “An improved dijkstra’s algorithm for shortest path planning on 2d grid maps,” in 2019 IEEE 9th International Conference on Electronics Information and Emergency Communication (ICEIEC). IEEE, 2019, pp. 438–441.
- Z. Zhu, L. Li, W. Wu, and Y. Jiao, “Application of improved dijkstra algorithm in intelligent ship path planning,” in 2021 33rd Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). IEEE, 2021, pp. 4926–4931.