Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information (2403.00706v2)

Published 1 Mar 2024 in quant-ph and cond-mat.supr-con

Abstract: Quantum error correction enables the preservation of logical qubits with a lower logical error rate than the physical error rate, with performance depending on the decoding method. Traditional error decoding approaches, relying on the binarization (hardening') of readout data, often ignore valuable information embedded in the analog (soft') readout signal. We present experimental results showcasing the advantages of incorporating soft information into the decoding process of a distance-three ($d=3$) bit-flip surface code with transmons. To this end, we use the $3\times3$ data-qubit array to encode each of the $16$ computational states that make up the logical state $\ket{0_{\mathrm{L}}}$, and protect them against bit-flip errors by performing repeated $Z$-basis stabilizer measurements. To infer the logical fidelity for the $\ket{0_{\mathrm{L}}}$ state, we average across the $16$ computational states and employ two decoding strategies: minimum weight perfect matching and a recurrent neural network. Our results show a reduction of up to $6.8\%$ in the extracted logical error rate with the use of soft information. Decoding with soft information is widely applicable, independent of the physical qubit platform, and could reduce the readout duration, further minimizing logical error rates.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (73)
  1. Fault-tolerant operation of a logical qubit in a diamond quantum processor. Nature 606 (7916), pp. 884–889. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  2. Neural network decoder for topological color codes with circuit level noise. New Journal of Physics 21 (1), pp. 013003. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  3. Learning to decode the surface code with a recurrent, transformer-based neural network. External Links: 2310.05900 Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  4. Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. Nature. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  5. General method for extracting the quantum efficiency of dispersive qubit readout in circuit qed. apl 112, pp. 092601. External Links: Link Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  6. Calibrated decoders for experimental quantum error correction. Physical Review Letters 128 (11), pp. 110504. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  7. N. Delfosse and N. H. Nickerson (2021) Almost-linear time decoding algorithm for topological codes. Quantum 5, pp. 595. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  8. Delft High Performance Computing Centre (DHPC) DelftBlue documentation. Note: https://doc.dhpc.tudelft.nl/delftblue/Accessed: 2023-05-15 Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  9. Topological quantum memory. Journal of Mathematical Physics 43 (9), pp. 4452–4505. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  10. A. G. Fowler (2014-10) Minimum weight perfect matching of fault-tolerant topological quantum error correction in average $O(1)$ parallel time. External Links: 1307.1740 Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  11. Protocols for optimal readout of qubits using a continuous quantum nondemolition measurement. Phys. Rev. A 76, pp. 012325. External Links: Document, Link Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  12. C. Gidney (2021-07) Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator. Quantum 5, pp. 497. External Links: Document, Link, ISSN 2521-327X Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  13. Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit. Nature 614 (7949), pp. 676–681. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  14. Google Quantum AI (2021) Exponential suppression of bit or phase errors with cyclic error correction. Nature 595 (7867), pp. 383–387. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  15. Encoding a magic state with beyond break-even fidelity. Nature 625 (7994), pp. 259–263. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  16. Rapid high-fidelity multiplexed readout of superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, pp. 034040. External Links: Document, Link Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  17. O. Higgott and C. Gidney (2023) Sparse blossom: correcting a million errors per core second with minimum-weight matching. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.15933. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  18. O. Higgott (2021) PyMatching: a Python package for decoding quantum codes with minimum-weight perfect matching. External Links: 2105.13082 Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  19. State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit. nat 519 (7541), pp. 66–69. External Links: Link Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  20. Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code. Nature 605 (7911), pp. 669–674 (en). External Links: ISSN 1476-4687, Document Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  21. Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code. Nature 605 (7911), pp. 669–674. External Links: ISSN 0028-0836, 1476-4687, Link, Document Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  22. Machine learning for discriminating quantum measurement trajectories and improving readout. prl 114, pp. 200501. External Links: Link Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  23. J. M. Martinis (2015) Qubit metrology for building a fault-tolerant quantum computer. npj Quantum Inf. 1, pp. 15005. External Links: Link Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  24. Towards understanding two-level-systems in amorphous solids: insights from quantum circuits. Reports on Progress in Physics 82 (12), pp. 124501. External Links: Document, Link Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  25. Optimal ensemble averaging of neural networks. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 8 (3), pp. 283. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  26. Density-matrix simulation of small surface codes under current and projected experimental noise. npj Quantum Information 3 (1), pp. 39. External Links: Document Cited by: Figure 1, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  27. Improved quantum error correction using soft information. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13589. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  28. Tomography via correlation of noisy measurement records. pra 91, pp. 022118. External Links: Link Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  29. Realization of real-time fault-tolerant quantum error correction. Physical Review X 11 (4), pp. 041058. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  30. Github Repository Surface-13 NN decoder External Links: Link Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  31. Adaptive weight estimator for quantum error correction in a time-dependent environment. Advanced Quantum Technologies 1 (1), pp. 1800012. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  32. Leakage suppression in the toric code. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), pp. 1119–1123. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  33. Demonstrating multi-round subsystem quantum error correction using matching and maximum likelihood decoders. Nature Communications 14 (1), pp. 2852. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  34. NEO-QEC: Neural Network Enhanced Online Superconducting Decoder for Surface Codes. arXiv. External Links: Link, 2208.05758 Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  35. Neural network decoder for near-term surface-code experiments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03280. Cited by: Figure 4, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information, Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  36. Leakage detection for a transmon-based surface code. npj Quantum Information 6 (1), pp. 102. Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  37. Github Repository Quantum REcurrent Neural Network Decoder (QRENND) External Links: Link Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  38. B. M. Varbanov (2024) Optimizing quantum error correction for superconducting qubit processors. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of University. External Links: Link Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  39. Repetitive quantum nondemolition measurement and soft decoding of a silicon spin qubit. Physical Review X 10 (2). External Links: ISSN 2160-3308, Link, Document Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  40. Realization of an error-correcting surface code with superconducting qubits. prl 129, pp. 030501. External Links: Link Cited by: Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information.
  41. Quantum error correction experiments on a 17-qubit superconducting processor. Part I: Optimized calibration strategies.. In APS March Meeting Abstracts, APS Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2022, pp. Q35.010. Cited by: Appendix A.
  42. Machine-learning-assisted correction of correlated qubit errors in a topological code. Quantum 2, pp. 48. Cited by: §C.1.
  43. Learning to decode the surface code with a recurrent, transformer-based neural network. External Links: 2310.05900 Cited by: §C.1, §C.2, §C.3, §C.4, §C.4, §E.1.1, Appendix F.
  44. Active resonator reset in the nonlinear dispersive regime of circuit QED. prapp 6, pp. 034008. External Links: Link Cited by: Appendix A, Appendix A.
  45. Calibrated decoders for experimental quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (11), pp. 110504. Cited by: Appendix A.
  46. Optimized driving of superconducting artificial atoms for improved single-qubit gates. pra 82, pp. 040305. External Links: Link Cited by: Appendix A.
  47. B. D’Anjou (2021) Generalized figure of merit for qubit readout. Physical Review A 103 (4), pp. 042404. Cited by: §C.3.
  48. Topological quantum memory. Journal of Mathematical Physics 43 (9), pp. 4452–4505. Cited by: Appendix D.
  49. A. G. Fowler (2014-10) Minimum weight perfect matching of fault-tolerant topological quantum error correction in average $O(1)$ parallel time. External Links: 1307.1740 Cited by: Appendix D.
  50. C. Gidney (2021-07) Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator. Quantum 5, pp. 497. External Links: Document, Link, ISSN 2521-327X Cited by: §D.1.
  51. Exponential suppression of bit or phase errors with cyclic error correction. Nature 595 (7867), pp. 383–387. Cited by: Appendix B.
  52. Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit. Nature 614 (7949), pp. 676–681. Cited by: Appendix B.
  53. Rapid high-fidelity multiplexed readout of superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, pp. 034040. External Links: Document, Link Cited by: Appendix A, Appendix A.
  54. O. Higgott (2021) PyMatching: a Python package for decoding quantum codes with minimum-weight perfect matching. External Links: 2105.13082 Cited by: Appendix D.
  55. Scalable in situ qubit calibration during repetitive error detection. pra 94, pp. 032321. Cited by: Appendix A.
  56. Physical qubit calibration on a directed acyclic graph. ArXiv:1803.03226. External Links: Link Cited by: Appendix A.
  57. Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code. Nature 605 (7911), pp. 669–674 (en). External Links: ISSN 1476-4687, Document Cited by: Appendix B.
  58. Scalable and robust randomized benchmarking of quantum processes. prl 106, pp. 180504. Cited by: Appendix A.
  59. Efficient measurement of quantum gate error by interleaved randomized benchmarking. prl 109, pp. 080505. External Links: Link Cited by: Figure S1, Appendix A.
  60. Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus. nat 449, pp. 443. Cited by: Appendix A.
  61. All-microwave leakage reduction units for quantum error correction with superconducting transmon qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, pp. 250602. External Links: Document, Link Cited by: Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix B.
  62. Overcoming leakage in quantum error correction. Nature Physics 19 (12), pp. 1780–1786. External Links: Document, Link Cited by: §E.1.1.
  63. Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits. prl 103, pp. 110501. External Links: Link Cited by: Appendix A.
  64. Optimal ensemble averaging of neural networks. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 8 (3), pp. 283. Cited by: §C.3.
  65. High-fidelity controlled-Z𝑍Zitalic_Z gate with maximal intermediate leakage operating at the speed limit in a superconducting quantum processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, pp. 220502. External Links: Document, Link Cited by: Appendix A.
  66. Improved quantum error correction using soft information. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13589. Cited by: §E.1.1, §E.1.1, §E.1, §E.2.4.
  67. AutoDepGraph External Links: Link Cited by: Appendix A.
  68. Asymmetric quantum codes: constructions, bounds and performance. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 465 (2105), pp. 1645–1672. Cited by: §D.1.
  69. Post-fabrication frequency trimming of coplanar-waveguide resonators in circuit QED quantum processors. Applied Physics Letters 123 (3), pp. 034004. External Links: ISSN 0003-6951, Document, Link Cited by: Appendix A.
  70. Neural network decoder for near-term surface-code experiments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03280. Cited by: §C.1, §C.1, §C.1, §C.4.
  71. Scalable quantum circuit and control for a superconducting surface code. Phys. Rev. Applied 8, pp. 034021. External Links: Document, Link Cited by: Appendix A.
  72. Rapid High-Fidelity Single-Shot Dispersive Readout of Superconducting Qubits. Physical Review Applied 7 (5), pp. 054020. External Links: ISSN 23317019, Link Cited by: Figure S1, Appendix A.
  73. C. J. Wood and J. M. Gambetta (2018-03) Quantification and characterization of leakage errors. Phys. Rev. A 97, pp. 032306. External Links: Document, Link Cited by: Figure S1, Appendix A.
Citations (8)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates a 6.8% reduction in logical error rate by leveraging analog readout data in surface code error correction.
  • It employs both MWPM and neural network decoders to adapt soft readout signals for improved qubit fidelity.
  • The findings highlight potential for scalable quantum error correction on 17-qubit superconducting platforms and beyond.

Reducing the Error Rate of a Superconducting Logical Qubit Using Analog Readout Information

The paper "Reducing the error rate of a superconducting logical qubit using analog readout information" addresses a pertinent challenge in quantum error correction (QEC): the integration of soft information to enhance the fidelity of logical qubits. Specifically, this research investigates methods to optimize the error correction of a distance-three (d=3d=3) bit-flip surface code by utilizing analog ('soft') readout data as opposed to conventional binary ('hard') readout processes. This approach is applied to a 17-qubit superconducting platform, prominently utilizing transmons.

The authors present empirical findings demonstrating a significant reduction in logical error rates by incorporating soft measurement data. A reduction of up to 6.8% in the logical error rate is achieved using a minimum-weight perfect matching (MWPM) decoder and a recurrent neural network (NN) decoder. The gain from soft decoding is uniform across the varied qubit platforms, suggesting a promising protocol applicable beyond the specific experimental setup.

Highlights and Methodology

In addressing quantum error correction, most efforts center around the development of sophisticated decoding algorithms. However, conventional strategies often rely on binarization of measurement data, ignoring potentially rich information contained within the analog signals. This paper builds on previous proposals advocating for soft information in decoding phases. Significant attention is given to adapting the MWPM and NN decoders to leverage continuous readout signals, thereby enabling more informed decision-making processes during error correction.

The experiment employs a superconducting device consisting of a 9x9 array of data qubits arranged into a d=3d=3 surface code. The system continuously performs ZZ-basis stabilizer measurements which are subsequently corrected using the aforementioned decoders. The dos instructions extend to using calibration data to fit probability density functions (PDFs) for readout classification, ensuring that the decoding process correctly factors in measurement uncertainties.

Numerical Results and Implications

Two decoding strategies—MWPM and NN—have been employed. Both strategies initially rely on constructing a decoding graph through pairwise correlation methods. The MWPM approach benefits from dynamic edge weighting adjustments based on per-shot soft information, which is a departure from average-based weight assignments. In contrast, the NN decoder is trained directly on experimental data, bypassing the need for pre-defined noise models. This flexibility allows the NN to inherently learn from variable fidelities and adapt accordingly.

The use of soft information shows demonstrable improvements in logical qubit performance. For the MWPM decoder, the logical error rate decreases significantly, while the NN approach achieves even higher accuracy, illustrating potential for more extensive usage of neural networks in QEC environments moving forward.

Future Directions

The results of this research emphasize the potential for soft information to reduce error rates in scalable quantum devices. Future studies could explore further reduction in readout duration that this approach allows, potentially minimizing errors even before data is fed into a decoder. Additionally, the integration of more sophisticated neural network architectures, trained on diverse datasets, may enhance accuracy and robustness of error correction in increasingly larger quantum systems. The efficiencies gained in this paper necessitate advancing beyond d=3d=3 surface codes, trialing these methods on higher-distance codes where gains may become more pronounced.

Overall, the advances demonstrated in this work underscore a critical evolutionary step in quantum error correction methodologies, combining experimental empiricism with evolving computational strategies for real-world quantum computation improvements.