Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Generalized User Representations for Transfer Learning (2403.00584v1)

Published 1 Mar 2024 in cs.IR and cs.LG

Abstract: We present a novel framework for user representation in large-scale recommender systems, aiming at effectively representing diverse user taste in a generalized manner. Our approach employs a two-stage methodology combining representation learning and transfer learning. The representation learning model uses an autoencoder that compresses various user features into a representation space. In the second stage, downstream task-specific models leverage user representations via transfer learning instead of curating user features individually. We further augment this methodology on the representation's input features to increase flexibility and enable reaction to user events, including new user experiences, in Near-Real Time. Additionally, we propose a novel solution to manage deployment of this framework in production models, allowing downstream models to work independently. We validate the performance of our framework through rigorous offline and online experiments within a large-scale system, showcasing its remarkable efficacy across multiple evaluation tasks. Finally, we show how the proposed framework can significantly reduce infrastructure costs compared to alternative approaches.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (46)
  1. Explainability in music recommender systems. AI Magazine 43, 2 (2022), 190–208.
  2. Charu C Aggarwal. 2016. Content-based recommender systems. In Recommender systems. Springer, 139–166.
  3. Xavier Amatriain and Justin Basilico. 2016. Past, present, and future of recommender systems: An industry perspective. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 211–214.
  4. A review on deep learning for recommender systems: challenges and remedies. Artificial Intelligence Review 52, 1 (2019), 1–37.
  5. Robert M Bell and Yehuda Koren. 2007. Lessons from the Netflix prize challenge. Acm Sigkdd Explorations Newsletter 9, 2 (2007), 75–79.
  6. Geoffray Bonnin and Dietmar Jannach. 2014. Automated generation of music playlists: Survey and experiments. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 47, 2 (2014), 1–35.
  7. Erion Çano and Maurizio Morisio. 2017. Hybrid recommender systems: A systematic literature review. Intelligent Data Analysis 21, 6 (2017), 1487–1524.
  8. Music recommendations with temporal context awareness. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems. 349–352.
  9. Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems. 191–198.
  10. Variational user modeling with slow and fast features. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 271–279.
  11. Exploring Adapter-based Transfer Learning for Recommender Systems: Empirical Studies and Practical Insights. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15036 (2023).
  12. Scalable Recommendation with Hierarchical Poisson Factorization.. In UAI. 326–335.
  13. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Ieee, 263–272.
  14. Recommendation systems: Principles, methods and evaluation. Egyptian informatics journal 16, 3 (2015), 261–273.
  15. Yehuda Koren. 2009. Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 447–456.
  16. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42, 8 (2009), 30–37.
  17. Hyper: A flexible and extensible probabilistic framework for hybrid recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 99–106.
  18. Maciej Kula. 2015. Metadata Embeddings for User and Item Cold-start Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on New Trends on Content-Based Recommender Systems co-located with 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys 2015), Vienna, Austria, September 16-20, 2015. (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1448), Toine Bogers and Marijn Koolen (Eds.). CEUR-WS.org, 14–21. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1448/paper4.pdf
  19. Transfer learning for collaborative filtering via a rating-matrix generative model. In Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning. 617–624.
  20. Sheng Li and Handong Zhao. 2020. A Survey on Representation Learning for User Modeling.. In IJCAI. 4997–5003.
  21. Variational autoencoders for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference. 689–698.
  22. Towards a fair marketplace: Counterfactual evaluation of the trade-off between relevance, fairness & satisfaction in recommendation systems. In Proceedings of the 27th acm international conference on information and knowledge management. 2243–2251.
  23. Andriy Mnih and Russ R Salakhutdinov. 2008. Probabilistic matrix factorization. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 1257–1264.
  24. Information filtering via biased random walk on coupled social network. The Scientific World Journal 2014 (2014).
  25. Transfer learning to predict missing ratings via heterogeneous user feedbacks. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. 2318.
  26. Transfer learning in collaborative filtering for sparsity reduction. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 24. 230–235.
  27. PinnerFormer: Sequence Modeling for User Representation at Pinterest. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 3702–3712.
  28. Deepak Kumar Panda and Sanjog Ray. 2022. Approaches and algorithms to mitigate cold start problems in recommender systems: a systematic literature review. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 59, 2 (2022), 341–366.
  29. Where To Next? A Dynamic Model of User Preferences. WWW 21 (2021), 19–23.
  30. Data Management Challenges in Production Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data (Chicago, Illinois, USA) (SIGMOD ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1723–1726. https://doi.org/10.1145/3035918.3054782
  31. Sequential variational autoencoders for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 600–608.
  32. Markus Schedl. 2019. Deep learning in music recommendation systems. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics 5 (2019), 44.
  33. Markus Schedl and David Hauger. 2015. Tailoring music recommendations to users by considering diversity, mainstreaminess, and novelty. In Proceedings of the 38th international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval. 947–950.
  34. Current challenges and visions in music recommender systems research. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval 7, 2 (2018), 95–116.
  35. The Importance of Song Context in Music Playlists.. In RecSys Posters.
  36. Sequence-based context-aware music recommendation. Information Retrieval Journal 21, 2 (2018), 230–252.
  37. Contrastive learning for cold-start recommendation. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 5382–5390.
  38. TransAct: Transformer-based Realtime User Action Model for Recommendation at Pinterest. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00248 (2023).
  39. Time-ordered collaborative filtering for news recommendation. China Communications 12, 12 (2015), 53–62.
  40. One person, one model, one world: Learning continual user representation without forgetting. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 696–705.
  41. Alleviating the cold-start playlist continuation in music recommendation using latent semantic indexing. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval 10, 3 (2021), 185–198.
  42. Learning from incomplete ratings using non-negative matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the 2006 SIAM international conference on data mining. SIAM, 549–553.
  43. Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 52, 1 (2019), 1–38.
  44. CrossRec: Cross-domain recommendations based on social big data and cognitive computing. Mobile networks and applications 23 (2018), 1610–1623.
  45. Auralist: introducing serendipity into music recommendation. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. 13–22.
  46. Variational session-based recommendation using normalizing flows. In The World Wide Web Conference. 3476–3475.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a dual-stage model that compresses user data with an autoencoder and applies transfer learning to improve recommendation precision.
  • The empirical analysis shows performance gains up to +15.2% in accuracy and +26.2% in AUC compared to traditional models.
  • The framework reduces feature engineering costs and integrates seamlessly in real-time systems, as demonstrated in a production environment like Spotify.

Generalized User Representations for Transfer Learning

The advancement of personalized recommendation systems, particularly in the context of large-scale digital platforms such as music streaming services, presents both challenges and opportunities. The paper "Generalized User Representations for Transfer Learning," by Fazelnia et al., addresses the need for robust user modeling frameworks that can leverage intricate user interaction data in music streaming services. This work primarily focuses on establishing a novel methodology for capturing and utilizing cryptic user preferences effectively across various application scenarios via transfer learning.

Methodological Approach

The proposed framework consists of a dual-stage model that integrates representation learning with transfer learning. It initially employs an autoencoder to compress user data into a succinct representation space before utilizing this information for downstream tasks without needing individual curation of user features. The methodology innovatively amalgamates different vectors of user interactions—including listening history and contextual aspects—into a unified representation, enabling the framework to adapt to changing user behavior in near real-time and address both established and cold-start users effectively.

Central to the framework’s design is its ability to seamlessly manage the large-scale deployment processes in industrial environments, thus making model components function autonomously. This is achieved through a refined batch management structure that ensures continued model reliability and consistency, circumventing the need to re-engineer downstream models frequently.

Empirical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation featuring both offline and online experiments within large-scale music streaming contexts, and the results underline the effective performance of the proposed model. Notably, the presented framework exhibits a significant improvement over baseline systems like Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) and LightFM models in terms of accuracy and AUC for future prediction tasks, demonstrating gains of up to +15.2% and +26.2%, respectively. These are indicative of the model's capacity to holistically and accurately encapsulate latent user preferences across myriad contexts.

Moreover, the introduction of generalized user representations into production models not only resulted in increased performance metrics but also reduced infrastructural costs associated with managing extensive feature engineering pipelines. The deployment within Spotify's real-time systems underscored these benefits by showcasing smoother integration processes and resource optimization, affirming the commercial viability of the approach.

Implications and Future Directions

This research paves a promising path for developing user-centric models that can adaptively respond to evolving user dynamics across digital platforms. Beyond its current application in music streaming, the model framework holds potential applicability to wider domains such as video streaming, online shopping, and news delivery, where heterogeneous user actions need to be harmonized for precise personalization.

The future development of the model could be inclined towards integrating modality encoders from advanced natural language processing domains. This could further enrich content categorization and recommendation strategies in multifaceted interactive environments. Additionally, the emphasis on ensuring data privacy and adhering to user anonymity mandates provides a pragmatic foundation as consumer data handling laws become stricter globally.

Conclusion

The paper by Fazelnia et al. delineates a meticulously crafted user representation methodology that enhances operational efficiency and recommendation precision across industrial-scale applications. By evaluating extensive offline and online scenarios, the findings substantiate the flexibility and efficacy of the proposed model design within the music streaming domain and beyond. This underscores the value of adopting sophisticated transfer learning and representation learning methods to forge ahead in the rapidly evolving space of personalized digital experiences.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com