Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

To Trust or Distrust Trust Measures: Validating Questionnaires for Trust in AI (2403.00582v2)

Published 1 Mar 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Despite the importance of trust in human-AI interactions, researchers must adopt questionnaires from other disciplines that lack validation in the AI context. Motivated by the need for reliable and valid measures, we investigated the psychometric quality of two trust questionnaires, the Trust between People and Automation scale (TPA) by Jian et al. (2000) and the Trust Scale for the AI Context (TAI) by Hoffman et al. (2023). In a pre-registered online experiment (N = 1485), participants observed interactions with trustworthy and untrustworthy AI (autonomous vehicle and chatbot). Results support the psychometric quality of the TAI while revealing opportunities to improve the TPA, which we outline in our recommendations for using the two questionnaires. Furthermore, our findings provide additional empirical evidence of trust and distrust as two distinct constructs that may coexist independently. Building on our findings, we highlight the opportunities and added value of measuring both trust and distrust in human-AI research and advocate for further work on both constructs.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (99)
  1. “Transparency in Measurement Reporting: A Systematic Literature Review of CHI PLAY” In Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5.CHI PLAY New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021 DOI: 10.1145/3474660
  2. “Trusting intelligent machines: Deepening trust within socio-technical systems” In IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 37.4 IEEE, 2018, pp. 76–83 DOI: 10.1109/MTS.2018.2876107
  3. John Benamati, Mark A Serva and Mark A Fuller “Are trust and distrust distinct constructs? An empirical study of the effects of trust and distrust among online banking users” In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06) 6 IEEE, 2006, pp. 121b–121b DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2006.63
  4. “The Value of Measuring Trust in AI-A Socio-Technical System Perspective” Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13480 In arXiv Preprint arXiv:2204.13480, 2022
  5. Joyce Berg, John Dickhaut and Kevin McCabe “Trust, reciprocity, and social history” In Games and economic behavior 10.1 Elsevier, 1995, pp. 122–142 DOI: 10.1006/game.1995.1027
  6. “’It’s Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage”’ In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’18 New York, NY: ACM, 2018, pp. 1–14 DOI: 10.1145/3173574.3173951
  7. “The Quality of Data Collected Online: An Investigation of Careless Responding in a Crowdsourced Sample” In Methods in Psychology 2, 2020, pp. 100022 DOI: 10.1016/j.metip.2020.100022
  8. “Proxy Tasks and Subjective Measures Can Be Misleading in Evaluating Explainable AI Systems” In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI ’20 Cagliari, Italy: ACM, 2020, pp. 454–464 DOI: 10.1145/3377325.3377498
  9. Michael Buhrmester, Tracy Kwang and Samuel D. Gosling “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?” In Perspectives on Psychological Science 6.1, 2011, pp. 3–5 DOI: 10.1177/1745691610393980
  10. John T Cacioppo and Gary G Berntson “Relationship Between Attitudes and Evaluative Space: A Critical Review, with Emphasis on the Separability of Positive and Negative Substrates.” In Psychological Bulletin 115.3 American Psychological Association, 1994, pp. 401–423 DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.401
  11. “Trust theory: A socio-cognitive and computational model” Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2010 DOI: 10.1002/9780470519851
  12. “Antecedents and distinctions between online trust and distrust: Predicting high-and low-risk internet behaviors” In Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 14.2 Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2013, pp. 149
  13. Lee J Cronbach “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests” In Psychometrika 16.3 Springer, 1951, pp. 297–334 DOI: 10.1007/BF02310555
  14. Paul G. Curran “Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data” In Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66, 2016, pp. 4–19 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006
  15. Fred D. Davis “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology” In MIS Quarterly 13.3 Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota, 1989, pp. 319–340 DOI: 10.2307/249008
  16. Robert F. DeVellis “Scale Development: Theory and Applications” Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications, Inc., 2017
  17. “Towards a Generalized Scale to Measure Situational Trust in AI Systems” In CHI 2022 TRAIT Workshop on Trust and Reliance in AI-Human Teams Virtual/New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022
  18. Benjamin D Douglas, Patrick J Ewell and Markus Brauer “Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA” In PLoS ONE 18.3, 2023, pp. e0279720 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279720
  19. Thomas J. Dunn, Thom Baguley and Vivienne Brunsden “From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation” In British Journal of Psychology 105.3, 2014, pp. 399–412 DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12046
  20. Fredrick Ekman, Mikael Johansson and Jana Sochor “Creating appropriate trust in automated vehicle systems: A framework for HMI design” In IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 48.1 IEEE, 2017, pp. 95–101 DOI: 10.1109/THMS.2017.2776209
  21. Connor Esterwood and Lionel P Robert Jr “Three Strikes and you are out!: The impacts of multiple human–robot trust violations and repairs on robot trustworthiness” In Computers in Human Behavior 142, 2023, pp. 107658 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107658
  22. Jessica K. Flake and Eiko I. Fried “Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them” In Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 3.4, 2020, pp. 456–465 DOI: 10.1177/2515245920952393
  23. Eiko I. Fried “Theories and Models: What They Are, What They Are for, and What They Are About” In Psychological Inquiry 31.4 Routledge, 2020, pp. 336–344 DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2020.1854011
  24. Francis Fukuyama “Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity” New York, NY: Free Press, 1996
  25. Mike Furr “Scale Construction and Psychometrics for Social and Personality Psychology” London: SAGE publications, Ltd., 2011
  26. Diego Gambetta “Can We Trust Trust?” In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, electronic edition Oxford: Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, 2000, pp. 213–237 URL: http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/papers/gambetta213-237.pdf
  27. “IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference” New York, NY: Routledge, 2019 DOI: 10.4324/9780429056765
  28. “Multivariate Data Analysis” Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2010
  29. D Harrison McKnight and Norman Chervany “While trust is cool and collected, distrust is fiery and frenzied: A model of distrust concepts” In 7th Americas Conference on Information Systems Boston, MA: AMCIS 2001 Proceedings, 2001, pp. 883–888
  30. “A Class of Invariant Consistent Tests for Multivariate Normality” In Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 19.10 Taylor & Francis, 1990, pp. 3595–3617 DOI: 10.1080/03610929008830400
  31. Kevin A. Hoff and Masooda Bashir “Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust” In Human Factors 57.3 Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2015, pp. 407–434 DOI: 10.1177/0018720814547570
  32. “The dynamics of trust in cyberdomains” In IEEE Intelligent Systems 24.6 IEEE, 2009, pp. 5–11 DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2009.124
  33. “Measures for explainable AI: Explanation goodness, user satisfaction, mental models, curiosity, trust, and human-AI performance” In Frontiers in Computer Science 5, 2023 DOI: 10.3389/fcomp.2023.1096257
  34. “Situational Trust Scale for Automated Driving (STS-AD): Development and Initial Validation” In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI ’20 Virtual Event, DC, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, pp. 40–47 DOI: 10.1145/3409120.3410637
  35. Kenneth D Hopkins “Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation” London: Pearson, 1998
  36. Matt C. Howard “A Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis Decisions and Overview of Current Practices: What We Are Doing and How Can We Improve?” In International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 32.1 Taylor & Francis, 2016, pp. 51–62 DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664
  37. Li-tze Hu and Peter M. Bentler “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus new Alternatives” In Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6.1 Routledge, 1999, pp. 1–55 DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
  38. “Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI” In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ’21 Virtual Event, Canada: ACM, 2021, pp. 624–635 DOI: 10.1145/3442188.3445923
  39. “How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AI” In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ’22 Seoul, Republic of Korea: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022, pp. 310–323 DOI: 10.1145/3531146.3533097
  40. Jiun-Yin Jian, Ann M. Bisantz and Colin G. Drury “Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems” In International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4.1 London, UK, GBR: Routledge, 2000, pp. 53–71 DOI: 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04
  41. Elizabeth F. Juniper “Validated Questionnaires Should not be Modified” In European Respiratory Journal 34.5 European Respiratory Society, 2009, pp. 1015–1017 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00110209
  42. ““Because AI is 100% Right and Safe”: User Attitudes and Sources of AI Authority in India” In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’22 New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022 DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3517533
  43. “Trust in artificial intelligence: Meta-analytic findings” In Human factors 65.2 SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2023, pp. 337–359 DOI: 10.1177/00187208211013988
  44. Rex B. Kline “Principles and practice of structural equation modeling” New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2016
  45. “Measurement of trust in automation: A narrative review and reference guide” In Frontiers in Psychology 12 Frontiers Media SA, 2021, pp. 604977 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604977
  46. Frens Kroeger “Unlocking the treasure trove: How can Luhmann’s theory of trust enrich trust research?” In Journal of Trust Research 9.1 Taylor & Francis, 2019, pp. 110–124 DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2018.1552592
  47. “Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: An Overview of Design Space in Empirical Human-Subject Studies” In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ’23 Chicago, IL, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, pp. 1369–1385 DOI: 10.1145/3593013.3594087
  48. “What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Research” In Artificial Intelligence 296 Amsterdam, NLD: Elsevier, 2021, pp. 103473 DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2021.103473
  49. ““Look! It’s a Computer Program! It’s an Algorithm! It’s AI!”: Does Terminology Affect Human Perceptions and Evaluations of Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems?” In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’22 New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022 DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3517527
  50. John D. Lee and Katrina A. See “Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance” In Human factors 46.1 London, UK, GBR: SAGE Publications, 2004, pp. 50–80 DOI: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
  51. Roy J Lewicki, Daniel J McAllister and Robert J Bies “Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities” In The Academy of Management Review 23.3 Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, 1998, pp. 438–458 DOI: 10.2307/259288
  52. Roy J Lewicki, Edward C Tomlinson and Nicole Gillespie “Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions” In Journal of management 32.6 Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2006, pp. 991–1022 DOI: 10.1177/0149206306294405
  53. James R. Lewis and Jeff Sauro “Revisiting the Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale” In Journal of Usability Studies 12.4, 2017, pp. 183–192
  54. James R. Lewis, Brian S. Utesch and Deborah E. Maher “UMUX-LITE: When There’s No Time for the SUS” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’13 Paris, France: Association for Computing Machinery, 2013, pp. 2099–2102 DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2481287
  55. “Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspective” In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ’22 Seoul, Republic of Korea: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022, pp. 1257–1268 DOI: 10.1145/3531146.3533182
  56. Zachary C. Lipton “The Mythos of Model Interpretability: In Machine Learning, the Concept of Interpretability is Both Important and Slippery.” In Queue 16.3 New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018, pp. 31–57 DOI: 10.1145/3236386.3241340
  57. Robert Loo “A caveat on using single-item versus multiple-item scales” In Journal of Managerial Psychology 17.1 MCB UP Ltd, 2002, pp. 68–75 DOI: 10.1108/02683940210415933
  58. “Human Reliance on Machine Learning Models When Performance Feedback is Limited: Heuristics and Risks” In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’21 Yokohama, Japan: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021 DOI: 10.1145/3411764.3445562
  59. Niklas Luhmann “Trust and Power” Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1979
  60. Robert C MacCallum, Michael W Browne and Hazuki M Sugawara “Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling” In Psychological methods 1.2 American Psychological Association, 1996, pp. 130–149 DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  61. Kantilal Vardichand Mardia “Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with Applications” In Biometrika 57.3, 1970, pp. 519–530 DOI: 10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
  62. Roger C. Mayer, James H. Davis and F.David Schoorman “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust” In Academy of Management Review 20.3 Briarcliff Manor, NY, USA: Academy of Management, 1995, pp. 709–734 DOI: 10.2307/258792
  63. Roderick P McDonald “Test theory: A unified treatment” New York, NY: Psychology Press, 1999 DOI: 10.4324/9781410601087
  64. D.Harrison McKnight and Norman L. Chervany “What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology” In International journal of electronic commerce 6.2 Taylor & Francis, 2001, pp. 35–59 DOI: 10.1080/10864415.2001.11044235
  65. Adam W Meade and S Bartholomew Craig “Identifying careless responses in survey data.” In Psychological methods 17.3 American Psychological Association, 2012, pp. 437–455 DOI: 10.1037/a0028085
  66. Stephanie M. Merritt “Affective Processes in Human–Automation Interactions” In Human Factors 53.4 Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2011, pp. 356–370 DOI: 10.1177/0018720811411912
  67. Sina Mohseni, Niloofar Zarei and Eric D. Ragan “A Multidisciplinary Survey and Framework for Design and Evaluation of Explainable AI Systems” Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.11839 In arXiv: Human-Computer Interaction, 2020 eprint: 1811.11839
  68. “Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion [Test Theory and Questionnaire Construction]” Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2020 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-61532-4
  69. Bonnie M Muir “Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems” In Ergonomics 37.11 Taylor & Francis, 1994, pp. 1905–1922 DOI: 10.1080/00140139408964957
  70. Carol Xiaojuan Ou and Choon Ling Sia “To Trust or to Distrust, That is the Question: Investigating the Trust-Distrust Paradox” In Commun. ACM 52.5 New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2009, pp. 135–139 DOI: 10.1145/1506409.1506442
  71. “Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse” In Human Factors 39.2 Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 1997, pp. 230–253 DOI: 10.1518/001872097778543886
  72. “Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research” In Behavior Research Methods 54 Springer, 2022, pp. 1643–1662 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3
  73. Sebastian A.C. Perrig, Nicolas Scharowski and Florian Brühlmann “Trust Issues with Trust Scales: Examining the Psychometric Quality of Trust Measures in the Context of AI” In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’23 Hamburg, Germany: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023 DOI: 10.1145/3544549.3585808
  74. “Development and Validation of a Positive-Item Version of the Visual Aesthetics of Websites Inventory: The VisAWI-Pos” In International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 0.0 Taylor & Francis, 2023, pp. 1–25 DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2258634
  75. Tobias M. Peters and Roel W. Visser “The Importance of Distrust in AI” In Explainable Artificial Intelligence Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, pp. 301–317 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-44070-0_15
  76. “Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretability” In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’21 Yokohama, Japan: ACM, 2021 DOI: 10.1145/3411764.3445315
  77. R Core Team “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing”, 2022 R Foundation for Statistical Computing URL: https://www.R-project.org/
  78. “Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust” In Academy of Management Review 23.3 Briarcliff Manor, NY, USA: Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, 1998, pp. 393–404 DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
  79. Mark NK Saunders, Graham Dietz and Adrian Thornhill “Trust and distrust: Polar opposites, or independent but co-existing?” In Human Relations 67.6 Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England, 2014, pp. 639–665 URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713500831
  80. Jeff Sauro and James R. Lewis “When Designing Usability Questionnaires, Does It Hurt to Be Positive?” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’11 Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery, 2011, pp. 2215–2224 DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979266
  81. Kristin E. Schaefer “Measuring Trust in Human Robot Interactions: Development of the "Trust Perception Scale-HRI"” In Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems Boston, MA: Springer US, 2016, pp. 191–218 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7668-0_10
  82. Nicolas Scharowski and Sebastian A.C. Perrig “Distrust in (X)AI – Measurement Artifact or Distinct Construct?” In CHI 2023 TRAIT Workshop on Trust and Reliance in AI-Human Teams Hamburg, Germany: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023 DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.16495
  83. “Trust and Reliance in XAI–Distinguishing Between Attitudinal and Behavioral Measures” In CHI TRAIT Workshop Virtual/New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022 DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.12318
  84. “Certification Labels for Trustworthy AI: Insights From an Empirical Mixed-Method Study” In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ’23 Chicago, IL, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, pp. 248–260 DOI: 10.1145/3593013.3593994
  85. “A Micro and Macro Perspective on Trustworthiness: Theoretical Underpinnings of the Trustworthiness Assessment Model (TrAM)” PsyArXiv, 2022 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/qhwvx
  86. “Trust and distrust on the web: User experiences and website characteristics” In Computers in human behavior 45 Elsevier, 2015, pp. 39–50 DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.064
  87. Sim B Sitkin and Nancy L Roth “Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust” In Organization science 4.3 INFORMS, 1993, pp. 367–392 URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.3.367
  88. Randall D. Spain, Ernesto A. Bustamante and James P. Bliss “Towards an Empirically Developed Scale for System Trust: Take Two” In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 52.19 Los Angeles, USA: SAGE Publications, 2008, pp. 1335–1339 DOI: 10.1177/154193120805201907
  89. Lauren Thornton, Bran Knowles and Gordon Blair “Fifty Shades of Grey: In Praise of a Nuanced Approach Towards Trustworthy Design” In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ’21 Virtual Event, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, pp. 64–76 DOI: 10.1145/3442188.3445871
  90. “The Relationship Between Trust in AI and Trustworthy Machine Learning Technologies” In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency New York, NY: ACM, 2020, pp. 272–283 DOI: 10.1145/3351095.3372834
  91. “Trust in Human-AI Interaction: Scoping Out Models, Measures, and Methods” In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’22 New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022 DOI: 10.1145/3491101.3519772
  92. Oleksandra Vereschak, Gilles Bailly and Baptiste Caramiaux “How to Evaluate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making? A Survey of Empirical Methodologies” In Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5.CSCW2 New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021 DOI: 10.1145/3476068
  93. “Gradual trust and distrust in recommender systems” In Fuzzy Sets and Systems 160.10 Elsevier, 2009, pp. 1367–1382 DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2008.11.014
  94. David Watson, Lee Anna Clark and Auke Tellegen “Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.” In Journal of personality and social psychology 54.6 American Psychological Association, 1988, pp. 1063–1070 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
  95. ““Let me explain!”: exploring the potential of virtual agents in explainable AI interaction design” In Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 15.2 Springer, 2021, pp. 87–98 DOI: 10.1007/s12193-020-00332-0
  96. Tiffany A. Whittaker and Randall E. Schumacker “A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling” New York, NY: Routledge, 2022 DOI: 10.4324/9781003044017
  97. Magdalena Wischnewski, Nicole Krämer and Emmanuel Müller “Measuring and Understanding Trust Calibrations for Automated Systems: A Survey of the State-Of-The-Art and Future Directions” In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’23 Hamburg, Germany: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023 DOI: 10.1145/3544548.3581197
  98. Ming Yin, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan and Hanna Wallach “Understanding The Effect of Accuracy on Trust in Machine Learning Models” In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’19 Glasgow, Scotland Uk: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, pp. 1–12 DOI: 10.1145/3290605.3300509
  99. “User Trust Dynamics: An Investigation Driven by Differences in System Performance” In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on intelligent user interfaces, IUI ’17 Limassol, Cyprus: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017, pp. 307–317 DOI: 10.1145/3025171.3025219
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets