Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Pro
GPT-5
GPT-4o
DeepSeek R1 via Azure
2000 character limit reached

Autonomous Robotic Arm Manipulation for Planetary Missions using Causal Machine Learning (2403.00470v1)

Published 1 Mar 2024 in astro-ph.IM, astro-ph.EP, cs.LG, and cs.RO

Abstract: Autonomous robotic arm manipulators have the potential to make planetary exploration and in-situ resource utilization missions more time efficient and productive, as the manipulator can handle the objects itself and perform goal-specific actions. We train a manipulator to autonomously study objects of which it has no prior knowledge, such as planetary rocks. This is achieved using causal machine learning in a simulated planetary environment. Here, the manipulator interacts with objects, and classifies them based on differing causal factors. These are parameters, such as mass or friction coefficient, that causally determine the outcomes of its interactions. Through reinforcement learning, the manipulator learns to interact in ways that reveal the underlying causal factors. We show that this method works even without any prior knowledge of the objects, or any previously-collected training data. We carry out the training in planetary exploration conditions, with realistic manipulator models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. D. Liu, Z. Wang, B. Lu, M. Cong, H. Yu, and Q. Zou, “A reinforcement learning-based framework for robot manipulation skill acquisition,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 108429–108437, 2020.
  2. “Jet Propulsion Laboratory Webpage.” https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/press_kits/mars_2020/launch/mission/spacecraft/power/. Accessed: 06-08-2023.
  3. A. Aziz Taha, “Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool.,” BMC Medical Imaging. 15 (29): 1–28, 2015.
  4. H. B. Zhou and J. T. Gao, “Automatic method for determining cluster number based on silhouette coefficient,” in Advanced Research on Intelligent System, Mechanical Design Engineering and Information Engineering III, vol. 951 of Advanced Materials Research, pp. 227–230, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 7 2014.
  5. Z. I. Botev, D. P. Kroese, R. Y. Rubinstein, and P. L’Ecuyer, “Chapter 3 - the cross-entropy method for optimization,” in Handbook of Statistics (C. Rao and V. Govindaraju, eds.), vol. 31 of Handbook of Statistics, pp. 35–59, Elsevier, 2013.
  6. R. S. Carmichael, “Section II - Densities of Rocks and Minerals,” in Practical Handbook of Physical Properties of Rocks and Minerals, p. 151, CRC Press, 1989.
  7. C. Meller and T. Kohl, “The significance of hydrothermal alteration zones for the mechanical behavior of a geothermal reservoir,” Geothermal Energy, vol. 2, p. 21, 10 2014.
  8. C. Hirt and W. Featherstone, “A 1.5km-resolution gravity field model of the moon,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters, vol. 329-330, pp. 22–30, 2012.
  9. C. Hirt, S. Claessens, M. Kuhn, and W. Featherstone, “Kilometer-resolution gravity field of mars: Mgm2011,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 147–154, 2012.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.