Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The Price of Opportunity Fairness in Matroid Allocation Problems (2403.00397v2)

Published 1 Mar 2024 in cs.GT

Abstract: We consider matroid allocation problems under opportunity fairness constraints: resources need to be allocated to a set of agents under matroid constraints (which includes classical problems such as bipartite matching). Agents are divided into C groups according to a sensitive attribute, and an allocation is opportunity-fair if each group receives the same share proportional to the maximum feasible allocation it could achieve in isolation. We study the Price of Fairness (PoF), i.e., the ratio between maximum size allocations and maximum size opportunity-fair allocations. We first provide a characterization of the PoF leveraging the underlying polymatroid structure of the allocation problem. Based on this characterization, we prove bounds on the PoF in various settings from fully adversarial (wort-case) to fully random. Notably, one of our main results considers an arbitrary matroid structure with agents randomly divided into groups. In this setting, we prove a PoF bound as a function of the size of the largest group. Our result implies that, as long as there is no dominant group (i.e., the largest group is not too large), opportunity fairness constraints do not induce any loss of social welfare (defined as the allocation size). Overall, our results give insights into which aspects of the problem's structure affect the trade-off between opportunity fairness and social welfare.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (61)
  1. Dynamic placement in refugee resettlement. In ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 2021.
  2. Toward fairness in face matching algorithms. 2019.
  3. Finding fair and efficient allocations for matroid rank valuations. 2021.
  4. The partial order of a polymatroid extreme point. Mathematics of Operations Research, 10:367–378, 1985.
  5. Fair and truthful mechanisms for dichotomous valuations. In AAAI, 2021.
  6. Fred Alois Behringer. Lexicographic quasiconcave multiobjective programming. Zeitschrift für Operations Research, 21:103–116, 1977.
  7. Proportionally fair matching with multiple groups. In Daniël Paulusma and Bernard” Ries, editors, Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science, 2023.
  8. The price of fairness. Oper. Res., 59:17–31, 2011.
  9. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In FAT, 2018.
  10. Fairness and Machine Learning. fairmlbook.org, 2019.
  11. The price of fairness for indivisible goods. Theory of Computing Systems, 2019.
  12. A new solution to the random assignment problem. Journal of Economic theory, 100:295–328, 2001.
  13. Eric Budish. The combinatorial assignment problem: Approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes. Journal of Political Economy, 119:1061–1103, 2011.
  14. Truthful and fair mechanisms for matroid-rank valuations. In AAAI, 2022.
  15. Matroids, matchings, and fairness. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2019.
  16. The unreasonable fairness of maximum nash welfare. 2019.
  17. Statistical discrimination in stable matchings. 2022.
  18. European Comission. Commission proposes new measures on skills and talent to help address critical labour shortages. 2023.
  19. Marketplaces and matching. International Economic Review, 39:239–254, 1998.
  20. Ulrich Derigs. Solving non-bipartite matching problems via shortest path techniques. Annals of Operations Research, 13:225–261, 1988.
  21. Equity and the informational basis of collective choice. volume 44, pages 199–209, 1977.
  22. Leximin and utilitarian rules: A joint characterization. Journal of Economic Theory, 17:143–163, 1978.
  23. Fairness through awareness. ITCS ’12, 2012.
  24. Liquidity flows and fragility of business enterprises. Macroeconomics eJournal, 2000.
  25. Fairness in matching under uncertainty. In ICML, 2023.
  26. Matching mechanisms for refugee resettlement. American Economic Review, 2023.
  27. Price of fairness in kidney exchange. In Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2014.
  28. Jack Edmonds. Submodular functions, matroids, and certain polyhedra. Combinatorial Structures and Their Applications, pages 69–87, 1970.
  29. Jack Edmonds. Matroid intersection. In Annals of discrete Mathematics, volume 4, pages 39–49. Elsevier, 1979.
  30. Rawlsian fairness in online bipartite matching: Two-sided, group, and individual. In Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2022.
  31. Online and Matching-Based Market Design. Cambridge University Press, 2023.
  32. Maximal flow through a network. Canadian journal of Mathematics, 8:399–404, 1956.
  33. Introduction to random graphs. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  34. Group fairness in dynamic refugee assignment. In ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 2023.
  35. Duncan Karl Foley. Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale University, 1966.
  36. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Resettlement fact sheet 2023. 2023.
  37. College admissions and the stability of marriage. The American Mathematical Monthly, 120:386 – 391, 2013.
  38. Discrete polymatroids. Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics, 16:239–268, 2002.
  39. Class fairness in online matching. In AAAI, 2023.
  40. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. 2016.
  41. Fair matching under constraints: Theory and applications. Review of Economic Studies, 2023.
  42. Preventing fairness gerrymandering: Auditing and learning for subgroup fairness. In ICML, 2018.
  43. Harold W Kuhn. The hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval research logistics quarterly, 2(1-2):83–97, 1955.
  44. How We Analyzed the COMPAS Recidivism Algorithm, 2016.
  45. On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2004.
  46. Algorithmic bias? an empirical study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of stem career ads. Manag. Sci., 65:2966–2981, 2019.
  47. Aranyak Mehta. Online matching and ad allocation. Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci., 8:265–368, 2013.
  48. Bounding and approximating intersectional fairness through marginal fairness. In NeurIPS, 2022.
  49. A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54:1 – 35, 2019.
  50. Group-level fairness maximization in online bipartite matching. In Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2020.
  51. Fairness maximization among offline agents in online-matching markets. 2021.
  52. Algorithmic game theory. 2007.
  53. James Oxley. Matroid theory. In Handbook of the Tutte Polynomial and Related Topics, pages 44–85. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2022.
  54. Potential for discrimination in online targeted advertising. In FAT, 2018.
  55. Amartya Sen. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Harvard University Press, 2017.
  56. Matchings with group fairness constraints: Online and offline algorithms. In IJCAI, 2021.
  57. Hugo Steinhaus. Sur la division pragmatique. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 315–319, 1949.
  58. Hal R Varian. Equity, envy, and efficiency. 1973.
  59. A general framework for fair allocation under matroid rank valuations. In ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 2023.
  60. Dietrich Weller. Fair division of a measurable space. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 14:5–17, 1985.
  61. Towards fairness in visual recognition: Effective strategies for bias mitigation. 2019.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets