Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Med-Real2Sim: Non-Invasive Medical Digital Twins using Physics-Informed Self-Supervised Learning (2403.00177v3)

Published 29 Feb 2024 in cs.LG and q-bio.QM

Abstract: A digital twin is a virtual replica of a real-world physical phenomena that uses mathematical modeling to characterize and simulate its defining features. By constructing digital twins for disease processes, we can perform in-silico simulations that mimic patients' health conditions and counterfactual outcomes under hypothetical interventions in a virtual setting. This eliminates the need for invasive procedures or uncertain treatment decisions. In this paper, we propose a method to identify digital twin model parameters using only noninvasive patient health data. We approach the digital twin modeling as a composite inverse problem, and observe that its structure resembles pretraining and finetuning in self-supervised learning (SSL). Leveraging this, we introduce a physics-informed SSL algorithm that initially pretrains a neural network on the pretext task of learning a differentiable simulator of a physiological process. Subsequently, the model is trained to reconstruct physiological measurements from noninvasive modalities while being constrained by the physical equations learned in pretraining. We apply our method to identify digital twins of cardiac hemodynamics using noninvasive echocardiogram videos, and demonstrate its utility in unsupervised disease detection and in-silico clinical trials.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (88)
  1. The non-invasive assessment of myocardial work by pressure-strain analysis: clinical applications. Heart Failure Reviews, 27(4):1261–1279, 2022.
  2. From patient-specific mathematical neuro-oncology to precision medicine. Frontiers in Oncology, 3, 2013. ISSN 2234-943X. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00062.
  3. Invasive left ventricle pressure–volume analysis: overview and practical clinical implications. European heart journal, 41(12):1286–1297, 2020.
  4. Digital twins to personalize medicine. Genome medicine, 12:1–4, 2020.
  5. AmbientGAN: Generative models from lossy measurements. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
  6. Digital twins in health care: Ethical implications of an emerging engineering paradigm. Frontiers in Genetics, 9, 2018. ISSN 1664-8021. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00031.
  7. Burkhoff, D. Pressure-volume loops in clinical research: a contemporary view, 2013.
  8. Assessment of systolic and diastolic ventricular properties via pressure-volume analysis: a guide for clinical, translational, and basic researchers. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 289(2):H501–H512, 2005. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00138.2005. PMID: 16014610.
  9. Digital twins: A general overview of the biopharma industry. Digital Twins: Applications to the Design and Optimization of Bioprocesses, pp.  167–184, 2021.
  10. Ai applications to medical images: From machine learning to deep learning. Physica Medica, 83:9–24, 2021. ISSN 1120-1797. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.006.
  11. Neural ordinary differential equations. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018.
  12. Modeling and identification of an axial flow blood pump. In Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 97CH36041), volume 6, pp.  3714–3715. IEEE, 1997.
  13. The ‘digital twin’to enable the vision of precision cardiology. European heart journal, 41(48):4556–4564, 2020.
  14. On the integration of agents and digital twins in healthcare. Journal of Medical Systems, 44:1–8, 2020.
  15. Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next. Journal of Scientific Computing, 92(3):88, 2022.
  16. del Álamo, M. Deep learning for inverse problems with unknown operator. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 17(1):723 – 768, 2023. doi: 10.1214/23-EJS2114.
  17. Drazner, M. H. Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Advanced Heart Failure. Jama, 328(12):1207–1209, 2022. ISSN 15383598. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.16348.
  18. Untrained physically informed neural network for image reconstruction of magnetic field sources. Physical review applied, 18(6), 2022. ISSN 2331-7019.
  19. Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device as Destination Therapy. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 32(4):S116, 2013. ISSN 10532498. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.01.244.
  20. Augmented neural odes, 2019.
  21. The digital twin revolution in healthcare. In 2020 4th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT), pp.  1–7, 2020. doi: 10.1109/ISMSIT50672.2020.9255249.
  22. A dynamical state space representation and performance analysis of a feedback controlled rotary left ventricular assist device. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, volume 42169, pp.  617–626, 2005.
  23. Single-cell Digital Twins for Cancer Preclinical Investigation, pp.  331–343. Springer US, New York, NY, 2020. ISBN 978-1-0716-0159-4. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0159-4_15.
  24. icvs-inferring cardio-vascular hidden states from physiological signals available at the bedside. Plos Computational Biology, 19(9):e1010835–e1010835, 2023.
  25. Learning atrial fiber orientations and conductivity tensors from intracardiac maps using physics-informed neural networks. In Ennis, D. B., Perotti, L. E., and Wang, V. Y. (eds.), Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart, pp.  650–658, Cham, 2021. Springer International Publishing.
  26. Patient-specific cardiovascular computational modeling: diversity of personalization and challenges. Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 11:80–88, 2018.
  27. Global guarantees for blind demodulation with generative priors. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
  28. Ep-pinns: Cardiac electrophysiology characterisation using physics-informed neural networks. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 8, 2022. ISSN 2297-055X. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.768419.
  29. An in silico twin for epicardial augmentation of the failing heart. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 35(10):e3233, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3233. e3233 cnm.3233.
  30. Considerations for ethics review of big data health research: A scoping review. PloS one, 13(10):e0204937, 2018.
  31. Mitral valve resistance as a determinant of resting and stress pulmonary artery pressure in patients with mitral stenosis: a dobutamine stress study. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 20(10):1160–1166, 2007.
  32. Conservative physics-informed neural networks on discrete domains for conservation laws: Applications to forward and inverse problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 365:113028, 2020.
  33. Deep convolutional neural network for inverse problems in imaging. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 26(9):4509–4522, 2017. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2713099.
  34. Determination of left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationships by the conductance (volume) catheter technique. Circulation, 73(3):586–595, 1986.
  35. Use of a conductance (volume) catheter and transient inferior vena caval occlusion for rapid determination of pressure-volume relationships in man. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 15(3):192–202, 1988. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810150314.
  36. hp-vpinns: Variational physics-informed neural networks with domain decomposition. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 374:113547, 2021.
  37. Estimation of three-and four-element windkessel parameters using subspace model identification. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 57(7):1531–1538, 2010.
  38. Machine learning in cardiovascular flows modeling: Predicting arterial blood pressure from non-invasive 4d flow mri data using physics-informed neural networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 358:112623, 2020. ISSN 0045-7825. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112623.
  39. Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks. In Ranzato, M., Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y., Liang, P., and Vaughan, J. W. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pp.  26548–26560. Curran Associates, Inc., 2021.
  40. Deblurgan: Blind motion deblurring using conditional adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2018.
  41. Structural identification with physics-informed neural ordinary differential equations. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 508:116196, 2021.
  42. Mri based bayesian personalization of a tumor growth model. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 35(10):2329–2339, 2016. ISSN 0278-0062.
  43. Deep Learning for Segmentation Using an Open Large-Scale Dataset in 2D Echocardiography. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 38(9):2198–2210, 2019. ISSN 1558254X. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2900516.
  44. Marwick, T. H. Ejection fraction pros and cons. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(19):2360–2379, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2162.
  45. Value and limitations of aortic valve resistance with particular consideration of low flow–low gradient aortic stenosis: an in vitro study. European heart journal, 25(9):787–793, 2004.
  46. Self-supervised learning of pretext-invariant representations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.  6707–6717, 2020.
  47. Motshabi-Chakane, P. Cardiovascular pressure-volume loops. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, pp. 1–5, 2023.
  48. A deep learning approach to structured signal recovery. In 2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), pp.  1336–1343, 2015. doi: 10.1109/ALLERTON.2015.7447163.
  49. Human digital twin for personalized healthcare: Vision, architecture and future directions. IEEE Network, 37(2):262–269, 2023. doi: 10.1109/MNET.118.2200071.
  50. Deep learning techniques for inverse problems in imaging. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory, 1:39–56, 2020.
  51. Mitral valve regurgitation. Current problems in cardiology, 9(2):1–52, 1984.
  52. Video-based AI for beat-to-beat assessment of cardiac function. Nature, 580(7802):252–256, 2020. ISSN 14764687. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2145-8.
  53. fpinns: Fractional physics-informed neural networks. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 41(4):A2603–A2626, 2019. doi: 10.1137/18M1229845.
  54. In silico clinical trials: concepts and early adoptions. Briefings in bioinformatics, 20(5):1699–1708, 2019a.
  55. In silico clinical trials: concepts and early adoptions. Briefings in bioinformatics, 20(5):1699–1708, 2019b.
  56. Pearl, J. Causality. Cambridge university press, 2009.
  57. Optimisation of manufacturing process parameters using deep neural networks as surrogate models. Procedia CIRP, 72:426–431, 2018. ISSN 2212-8271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.046. 51st CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems.
  58. Assessment of left ventricular function by echocardiography. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 11(2_Part_1):260–274, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.017.
  59. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational physics, 378:686–707, 2019.
  60. Spinn: sparse, physics-based, and partially interpretable neural networks for pdes. Journal of Computational Physics, 445:110600, 2021.
  61. Digital twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. Ieee Access, 8:21980–22012, 2020.
  62. Deep Learning for Medical Image Processing: Overview, Challenges and the Future, pp.  323–350. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018. ISBN 978-3-319-65981-7. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65981-7_12.
  63. Physics-informed neural networks for cardiac activation mapping. Frontiers in Physics, 8:42, 2020.
  64. Modeling and estimation of the cardiac electromechanical activity. Computers and Structures, 84:1743–1759, 2006.
  65. Fully automatic calibration of tumor-growth models using a single mpmri scan. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 40(1):193–204, 2021. ISSN 0278-0062.
  66. Early hemodynamic changes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis measured by invasive pressure volume loop analysis. Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 37(1):191–201, 2022. ISSN 1868-4300.
  67. A dynamical state space representation and performance analysis of a feedback-controlled rotary left ventricular assist device. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 17(1):15–28, 2008.
  68. Determinants of stroke volume and systolic and diastolic aortic pressure. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 270(6):H2050–H2059, 1996.
  69. Deep learning in medical image analysis and multimodal learning for clinical decision support: 4th international workshop, dlmia 2018, and 8th international workshop, ml-cds 2018, held in conjunction with miccai 2018, granada, spain, september 20, 2018, proceedings, volume 11045. Springer, 2018.
  70. Subramanian, K. Digital twin for drug discovery and development—the virtual liver. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 100(4):653–662, 2020.
  71. Digital twin in healthcare: Recent updates and challenges. DIGITAL HEALTH, 9:20552076221149651, 2023. doi: 10.1177/20552076221149651.
  72. Physics-informed neural networks for myocardial perfusion mri quantification. Medical Image Analysis, 78:102399, 2022. ISSN 1361-8415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102399.
  73. In silico clinical trials: how computer simulation will transform the biomedical industry. International Journal of Clinical Trials, 3(2):37–46, 2016.
  74. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17:261–272, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.
  75. Digital twins for multiple sclerosis. Frontiers in Immunology, 12, 2021. ISSN 1664-3224. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.669811.
  76. Informed machine learning – a taxonomy and survey of integrating prior knowledge into learning systems. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(1):614–633, 2023. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2021.3079836.
  77. Human digital twin in the context of industry 5.0. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 85:102626, 2024. ISSN 0736-5845. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2023.102626.
  78. Use of pressure-volume conductance catheters in real-time cardiovascular experimentation. Heart, Lung and Circulation, 23(11):1059–1069, 2014. ISSN 1443-9506. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2014.04.130.
  79. Werbos, P. An overview of neural networks for control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 11(1):40–41, 1991. doi: 10.1109/37.103352.
  80. The arterial windkessel. Medical & biological engineering & computing, 47(2):131–141, 2009.
  81. Role of left ventricular stiffness in heart failure with normal ejection fraction. Circulation, 117(16):2051–2060, 2008. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.716886.
  82. Integrating mechanism-based modeling with biomedical imaging to build practical digital twins for clinical oncology. Biophysics reviews, 3(2):021304–021304, 2022. ISSN 2688-4089.
  83. Physics constrained learning for data-driven inverse modeling from sparse observations. Journal of Computational Physics, 453:110938, 2022. ISSN 0021-9991. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110938.
  84. B-pinns: Bayesian physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse pde problems with noisy data. Journal of Computational Physics, 425:109913, 2021.
  85. Yu, Y.-C. Minimally invasive estimation of cardiovascular parameters. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, 1998.
  86. Physics-constrained machine learning of evapotranspiration. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(24):14496–14507, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085291.
  87. Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning. Nature, 555(7697):487–492, 2018.
  88. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp.  2242–2251, 2017. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2017.244.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com