Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Social Links vs. Language Barriers: Decoding the Global Spread of Streaming Content (2402.19329v2)

Published 29 Feb 2024 in physics.soc-ph, cs.CY, and cs.SI

Abstract: The development of the internet has allowed for the global distribution of content, redefining media communication and property structures through various streaming platforms. Previous studies successfully clarified the factors contributing to trends in each streaming service, yet the similarities and differences between platforms are commonly unexplored; moreover, the influence of social connections and cultural similarity is usually overlooked. We hereby examine the social aspects of three significant streaming services--Netflix, Spotify, and YouTube--with an emphasis on the dissemination of content across countries. Using two-year-long trending chart datasets, we find that streaming content can be divided into two types: video-oriented (Netflix) and audio-oriented (Spotify). This characteristic is differentiated by accounting for the significance of social connectedness and linguistic similarity: audio-oriented content travels via social links, but video-oriented content tends to spread throughout linguistically akin countries. Interestingly, user-generated contents, YouTube, exhibits a dual characteristic by integrating both visual and auditory characteristics, indicating the platform is evolving into unique medium rather than simply residing a midpoint between video and audio media.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. [n. d.]. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/
  2. Who watches (and shares) what on youtube? and when? using twitter to understand youtube viewership. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. 593–602.
  3. powerlaw: a Python package for analysis of heavy-tailed distributions. PloS one 9, 1 (2014), e85777.
  4. Young Min Baek. 2015. Relationship between cultural distance and cross-cultural music video consumption on YouTube. Social Science Computer Review 33, 6 (2015), 730–748.
  5. Social connectedness: Measurement, determinants, and effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives 32, 3 (2018), 259–280.
  6. International trade and social connectedness. Journal of International Economics 129 (2021), 103418.
  7. A Database and Visualization of the Similarity of Contemporary Lexicons. In Text, Speech, and Dialogue, Kamil Ekštein, František Pártl, and Miloslav Konopík (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 95–104.
  8. Jonah Berger and Katherine L Milkman. 2012. What makes online content viral? Journal of marketing research 49, 2 (2012), 192–205.
  9. Youtube around the world: geographic popularity of videos. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. 241–250.
  10. Steven Caldwell Brown and Don Knox. 2016. Why buy an album? The motivations behind recorded music purchases. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain 26, 1 (2016), 79.
  11. JungBong Choi and Roald Maliangkay. 2014. K-pop-The International Rise of the Korean Music Industry. Routledge.
  12. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM review 51, 4 (2009), 661–703.
  13. Marco Dueñas and Antoine Mandel. 2023. The structure of global cultural networks: Evidence from the diffusion of music videos. Plos one 18, 11 (2023), e0294149.
  14. Margaret Holland. 2016. How YouTube developed into a successful platform for user-generated content. Elon journal of undergraduate research in communications 7, 1 (2016).
  15. Andrei A Istratov and Oleg F Vyvenko. 1999. Exponential analysis in physical phenomena. Review of Scientific Instruments 70, 2 (1999), 1233–1257.
  16. Edward P Lazear. 1999. Culture and language. Journal of political Economy 107, S6 (1999), S95–S126.
  17. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. science 331, 6014 (2011), 176–182.
  18. Tausif Mulla. 2022. Assessing the factors influencing the adoption of over-the-top streaming platforms: A literature review from 2007 to 2021. Telematics and Informatics 69 (2022), 101797.
  19. Onset of power law aftershock decay rates in southern California. Geophysical research letters 32, 22 (2005).
  20. Joseph S Nye. 1990. Soft power. Foreign policy 80 (1990), 153–171.
  21. Sungwook Park and Youngsun Kwon. 2019. Research on the Relationship between the Growth of OTT Service Market and the Change in the Structure of the Pay-TV Market. (2019).
  22. Using early view patterns to predict the popularity of youtube videos. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. 365–374.
  23. Rishav Sharma. 2023. YouTube Trending Video Dataset (updated daily). https://doi.org/10.34740/KAGGLE/DSV/7530407
  24. Gary Sinclair and Julie Tinson. 2017. Psychological ownership and music streaming consumption. Journal of Business Research 71 (2017), 1–9.
  25. Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Scientific reports 3, 1 (2013), 1–6.
  26. Quantifying knowledge synchronization with the network-driven approach. Journal of Informetrics 17, 4 (2023), 101455.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Seoyoung Park (1 paper)
  2. Sanghyeok Park (10 papers)
  3. Taekho You (8 papers)
  4. Jinhyuk Yun (18 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.