Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Ambisonics Networks -- The Effect Of Radial Functions Regularization (2402.18968v1)

Published 29 Feb 2024 in eess.AS and cs.SD

Abstract: Ambisonics, a popular format of spatial audio, is the spherical harmonic (SH) representation of the plane wave density function of a sound field. Many algorithms operate in the SH domain and utilize the Ambisonics as their input signal. The process of encoding Ambisonics from a spherical microphone array involves dividing by the radial functions, which may amplify noise at low frequencies. This can be overcome by regularization, with the downside of introducing errors to the Ambisonics encoding. This paper aims to investigate the impact of different ways of regularization on Deep Neural Network (DNN) training and performance. Ideally, these networks should be robust to the way of regularization. Simulated data of a single speaker in a room and experimental data from the LOCATA challenge were used to evaluate this robustness on an example algorithm of speaker localization based on the direct-path dominance (DPD) test. Results show that performance may be sensitive to the way of regularization, and an informed approach is proposed and investigated, highlighting the importance of regularization information.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. F. Zotter and M. Frank, Ambisonics: A Practical 3D Audio Theory for Recording, Studio Production, Sound Reinforcement, and Virtual Reality, 01 2019.
  2. B. Rafaely, Fundamentals of Spherical Array Processing, Springer Topics in Signal Processing. Springer, Germany, second edition, 2019, notValidatingIssn:1866-2609 ;.
  3. B. Rafaely, “Plane-wave decomposition of the sound field on a sphere by spherical convolution,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 2149–2157, 10 2004.
  4. J. Daniel and S. Kitic, “Echo-enabled direction-of-arrival and range estimation of a mobile source in ambisonic domain,” in 2022 30th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 2022, pp. 852–856.
  5. M. Lugasi and B. Rafaely, “Speech enhancement using masking for binaural reproduction of ambisonics signals,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 28, pp. 1767–1777, 2020.
  6. N. R. Shabtai and B. Rafaely, “Binaural sound reproduction beamforming using spherical microphone arrays,” in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2013, pp. 101–105.
  7. “Sound source separation in the higher order ambisonics domain,” 07 2019.
  8. Parametric Time-Frequency Domain Spatial Audio, chapter 2, Wiley-Blackwell, United States, Dec. 2017.
  9. “Direction of arrival estimation for reverberant speech based on neural networks and the direct-path dominance test,” in 2022 International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement (IWAENC), 2022, pp. 1–5.
  10. “AmbiSep: Ambisonic-to-Ambisonic reverberant speech separation using transformer networks,” Bamberg, Germany, Sept. 2022.
  11. “Ambisonics domain singing voice separation combining deep neural network and direction aware multichannel nmf,” in 2021 IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), 2021, pp. 1–6.
  12. “Direction specific ambisonics source separation with end-to-end deep learning,” Acta Acustica, vol. 7, 06 2023.
  13. “Dilated u-net based approach for multichannel speech enhancement from first-order ambisonics recordings,” in 2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 2021, pp. 216–220.
  14. N. Hahn and S. Spors, “Further investigations on the design of radial filters for the driving functions of near-field compensated higher-order ambisonics,” in Audio Engineering Society Convention 142, May 2017.
  15. S. Lösler and F. Zotter, “Comprehensive radial filter design for practical higher-order ambisonic recording,” Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA, , no. 1, pp. 452–455, 2015.
  16. “Comparison of modal versus delay-and-sum beamforming in the context of data-based binaural synthesis,” 04 2012.
  17. A. Tikhonov and V. IA. Arsenin, Solutions of ill-posed problems, Scripta series in mathematics. Winston and distributed solely by Halsted Press, 1977.
  18. R. Schmidt, “Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 276–280, 1986.
  19. O. Nadiri and B. Rafaely, “Localization of multiple speakers under high reverberation using a spherical microphone array and the direct-path dominance test,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1494–1505, 2014.
  20. J. Allen and D. Berkley, “Image method for efficiently simulating small-room acoustics,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 65, pp. 943–950, 04 1979.
  21. J. S. Garofolo, “Timit acoustic phonetic continuous speech corpus,” Linguistic Data Consortium, 1993, 1993.
  22. “The locata challenge data corpus for acoustic source localization and tracking,” in 2018 IEEE 10th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), 2018, pp. 410–414.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that regularization in Ambisonics encoding directly influences DNN-based speaker localization, revealing a trade-off between noise suppression and signal distortion.
  • It details the use of Tikhonov regularization, emphasizing that optimal parameterization is crucial for reducing low-frequency noise while maintaining signal integrity.
  • Informed algorithms that integrate regularization data significantly enhance DOA estimation accuracy, suggesting robust strategies for spatial audio applications in complex environments.

Exploring Regularization Techniques in Ambisonics for Speaker Localization Algorithms

Introduction to Ambisonics and Regularization Techniques

Ambisonics has become an increasingly popular method for capturing and reproducing spatial audio, especially with the advent of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies. One critical challenge in the Ambisonics encoding process, particularly when using spherical microphone arrays, involves the amplification of noise at low frequencies due to division by small-magnitude radial functions. Regularization techniques have been proposed to mitigate this issue, albeit with the trade-off of introducing errors in the encoded Ambisonics signals. This paper investigates the influence of different regularization techniques on the training and performance of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) utilized for speaker localization, aiming to understand the robustness of these networks to varying levels of regularization.

Ambisonics Signal Encoding and Regularization

The process of encoding Ambisonics signals from spherical array data using regularized Plane-Wave Decomposition (PWD) is discussed, emphasizing the compromise between minimizing noise and preserving signal integrity. Specifically, the paper explains how regularization affects Ambisonics signals in terms of noise amplification and distortion, utilizing the Tikhonov regularization method as a focal example due to its effective parameterization. The paper underscores the impact of different regularization choices, showing that while noise can be suppressed with an appropriate selection of the regularization matrix, the accuracy in estimating Ambisonics signals may be compromised.

Speaker Localization Using DNN-DPD Algorithm

An illustrative application involving a speaker localization algorithm based on DNN, termed DNN-DPD, is evaluated to demonstrate the sensitivity of Ambisonics algorithms to varying regularization levels. This algorithm extends the Direct Path Dominance (DPD) test method by incorporating neural networks to classify input features based on Ambisonics signals as containing direct sound, which is then utilized for Direction Of Arrival (DOA) estimation. The paper's experimental investigation explores the effect of Ambisonics regularization on the DNN-DPD algorithm, contrasting the performance of informed and uninformed algorithms in simulations and real data from the LOCATA challenge.

Experimental Findings and Implications

The research findings reveal a direct correlation between the level of regularization employed during the Ambisonics encoding process and the performance of the DNN-DPD algorithm in speaker localization tasks. Notably, the paper illustrates how stronger regularization adversely affects the algorithm's accuracy, particularly at lower frequencies where distortion is more prevalent. Furthermore, incorporating regularization information into the model (the informed algorithm) demonstrates significant improvements in performance, underlining the value of leveraging regularization knowledge in Ambisonics networks.

Concluding Remarks

The implications of this research are twofold: firstly, it highlights the critical sensitivity of DNN-based Ambisonics algorithms to the specifics of regularization techniques employed in spatial audio encoding. Secondly, it posits that an informed approach, where the regularization information is integrated into the network, can enhance the robustness and performance of Ambisonics networks. These insights pave the way for further exploration into regularization-informed approaches for a broader range of applications within Ambisonics networks, potentially advancing the domain of spatial audio processing in complexity-ridden environments like reverberant rooms. Future investigations could extend these findings to other Ambisonics-based tasks beyond speaker localization, further refining the synergy between spatial audio encoding and machine learning algorithms.