Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Nonlinear identification algorithm for online and offline study of pulmonary mechanical ventilation (2402.18709v1)

Published 28 Feb 2024 in eess.SY, cs.SY, and physics.med-ph

Abstract: This work presents an algorithm for determining the parameters of a nonlinear dynamic model of the respiratory system in patients undergoing assisted ventilation. Using the pressure and flow signals measured at the mouth, the model's quadratic pressure-volume characteristic is fit to this data in each respiratory cycle by appropriate estimates of the model parameters. Parameter changes during ventilation can thus also be detected. The algorithm is first refined and assessed using data derived from simulated patients represented through a sigmoidal pressure-volume characteristic with hysteresis. As satisfactory results are achieved with the simulated data, the algorithm is evaluated with real data obtained from actual patients undergoing assisted ventilation. The proposed nonlinear dynamic model and associated parameter estimation algorithm yield closer fits than the static linear models computed by respiratory machines, with only a minor increase in computation. They also provide more information to the physician, such as the pressure-volume (P-V) curvature and the condition of the lung (whether normal, under-inflated, or over-inflated). This information can be used to provide safer ventilation for patients, for instance by ventilating them in the linear region of the respiratory system.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. The future of mechanical ventilation: lessons from the present and the past. Critical Care 2017; 21(1): 1–11.
  2. Mechanical ventilation parameters in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a scoping review. Critical Care 2021; 25(1): 1–11.
  3. The basics of respiratory mechanics: ventilator-derived parameters. Annals of Translational Medicine 2018; 6(19): 376.
  4. Effects of different PEEP levels on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2013; 28: 380–385.
  5. Walter JM, Corbridge TC and Singer BD. Invasive mechanical ventilation. Southern Medical Journal 2018; 111(12): 746.
  6. A computer program for automatic measurement of respiratory mechanics in artificially ventilated patients. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1995; 47(3): 205–220.
  7. Measurements of Respiratory Mechanics During Mechanical Ventilation. Rhazuns, Switzerland: Hamilton Medical Scientific Library, 1999.
  8. Hierarchical parameter identification in models of respiratory mechanics. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2011; 58(11): 3234–3241.
  9. Evaluation of model-based methods in estimating respiratory mechanics in the presence of variable patient effort. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2019; 171: 67–79.
  10. Assessing respiratory mechanics using pressure reconstruction method in mechanically ventilated spontaneous breathing patient. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2016; 130: 175–185.
  11. Next-generation, personalised, model-based critical care medicine: a state-of-the art review of in silico virtual patient models, methods, and cohorts, and how to validation them. Biomedical Engineering Online 2018; 17(1): 1–29.
  12. Optimising mechanical ventilation through model-based methods and automation. Annual Reviews in Control 2019; 48: 369–382.
  13. Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21(1): 1–18.
  14. Iterative integral parameter identification of a respiratory mechanics model. Biomedical Engineering Online 2012; 11(1): 1–14.
  15. Lucangelo U, Bernabé F and Blanch L. Respiratory mechanics derived from signals in the ventilator circuit. Respiratory care 2005; 50(1): 55–67.
  16. Clinical review: respiratory mechanics in spontaneous and assisted ventilation. Critical Care 2005; 9(5): 1–13.
  17. West JB. Respiratory Physiology: The Essentials. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012.
  18. PEEP titration to minimize driving pressure in subjects with ARDS: a prospective physiological study. Respiratory Care 2020; 65(5): 583–589.
  19. van der Zee P and Gommers D. Recruitment maneuvers and higher PEEP, the so-called open lung concept, in patients with ARDS. Critical Care 2019; 23(1): 1–7.
  20. Finding best PEEP: A little at a time. Respiratory Care 2020; 65(5): 722–724.
  21. Tobin MJ. Mechanical ventilation. New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 330(15): 1056–1061.
  22. Lung recruitment during small tidal volume ventilation allows minimal positive end-expiratory pressure without augmenting lung injury. Critical Care Medicine 1999; 27(9): 1940–1945.
  23. Harris RS. Pressure-volume curves of the respiratory system. Respiratory Care 2005; 50(1): 78–99.
  24. A simple automated method for measuring pressure–volume curves during mechanical ventilation. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1999; 159(1): 275–282.
  25. Escolar Castellón JdD et al. Lung hysteresis: a morphological view. Histology and Histopathology 2004; 19(1): 159–166.
  26. Hysteresis ratio: a measure of the mechanical efficiency of fibrotic and emphysematous hamster lung tissue. American Review of Respiratory Disease 1980; 122(1): 47–52.
  27. Venegas JG, Harris RS and Simon BA. A comprehensive equation for the pulmonary pressure-volume curve. Journal of Applied Physiology 1998; 84(1): 389–395.
  28. Atelectasis causes alveolar injury in nonatelectatic lung regions. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2006; 174(3): 279–289.
  29. Lung strain and biological response in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Medicine 2012; 38(2): 240–247.
  30. Muñiz-Albaiceta G. Pressure-volume curves in acute pulmonary injury. Medicina Intensiva 2009; 33(5): 243–250.
  31. Bates JH. Lung Mechanics: an Inverse Modeling Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  32. Grey-box modeling and application for building energy simulations - A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021; 146: 111174.
  33. Development and validation of “grey-box” models for refrigeration applications: A review of key concepts. International Journal of Refrigeration 2006; 29(6): 931–946.
  34. Gavin HP. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for nonlinear least squares curve-fitting problems. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University 2019; 19.
  35. Lourakis MI et al. A brief description of the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm implemented by levmar. Foundation of Research and Technology 2005; 4(1): 1–6.
  36. Widrow B, Kollar I and Liu MC. Statistical theory of quantization. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 1996; 45(2): 353–361.
  37. Pressure–time curve predicts minimally injurious ventilatory strategy in an isolated rat lung model. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists 2000; 93(5): 1320–1328.
  38. Hess DR. Recruitment maneuvers and PEEP titration. Respiratory Care 2015; 60(11): 1688–1704.
  39. Bedside estimation of recruitable alveolar collapse and hyperdistension by electrical impedance tomography. In Applied Physiology in Intensive Care Medicine 1. Springer, 2012. pp. 165–170.
  40. Reversibility of lung collapse and hypoxemia in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2006; 174(3): 268–278.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.