Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Semantic Information in MC: Chemotaxis Beyond Shannon (2402.18465v2)

Published 28 Feb 2024 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: The recently emerged molecular communication (MC) paradigm intends to leverage communication engineering tools for the design of synthetic chemical communication systems. These systems are envisioned to operate at nanoscale and in biological environments, such as the human body, and catalyze the emergence of revolutionary applications in the context of early disease monitoring and drug targeting. Despite the abundance of theoretical (and recently also experimental) MC system designs proposed over the past years, some fundamental questions remain unresolved, hindering the breakthrough of MC in real-world applications. One of these questions is: What can be a useful measure of information in the context of MC applications? While most existing works on MC build upon the concept of syntactic information as introduced by Shannon, in this paper, we explore the framework of semantic information as introduced by Kolchinsky and Wolpert for the information-theoretic analysis of a natural MC system, namely bacterial chemotaxis. Exploiting computational agent-based modeling (ABM), we are able to quantify, for the first time, the amount of information that the considered chemotactic bacterium (CB) utilizes to adapt to and survive in a dynamic environment. In other words, we show how the flow of information between the environment and the CB is related to the effectiveness of communication. Effectiveness here refers to the adaptation of the CB to the dynamic environment in order to ensure survival. Our analysis reveals that it highly depends on the environmental conditions how much information the CB can effectively utilize for improving their survival chances. Encouraged by our results, we envision that the proposed semantic information framework can open new avenues for the development of theoretical and experimental MC system designs for future nanoscale applications.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. W. Weaver, “Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication,” ETC: A Review of General Semantics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 261–281, 1953.
  2. G. Shi, Y. Xiao, Y. Li, and X. Xie, “From semantic communication to semantic-aware networking: Model, architecture, and open problems,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 44–50, Aug. 2021.
  3. W. Yang et al., “Semantic communications for future internet: Fundamentals, applications, and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 213–250, Nov. 2022.
  4. E. C. Strinati and S. Barbarossa, “6G networks: Beyond Shannon towards semantic and goal-oriented communications,” Comput. Netw., vol. 190, p. 107930, Mar. 2021.
  5. I. F. Akyildiz, M. Pierobon, S. Balasubramaniam, and Y. Koucheryavy, “The Internet of Bio-Nano Things,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 32–40, Mar. 2015.
  6. B. Ruzzante, L. Del Moro, M. Magarini, and P. Stano, “Synthetic cells extract semantic information from their environment,” Trans. Mol. Biol. Multi Scale Commun., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23–27, Feb. 2023.
  7. T. S. Barker, P. J. Thomas, and M. Pierobon, “A metric to quantify subjective information in biological gradient sensing,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM).   IEEE, Dec. 2023.
  8. A. Kolchinsky and D. H. Wolpert, “Semantic information, autonomous agency and non-equilibrium statistical physics,” Interface Focus, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 20180041, Oct. 2018.
  9. K. Nagarajan, C. Ni, and T. Lu, “Agent-based modeling of microbial communities,” ACS Synth. Biol., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 3564–3574, Oct. 2022.
  10. S. Abar, G. K. Theodoropoulos, P. Lemarinier, and G. M. O’Hare, “Agent based modelling and simulation tools: A review of the state-of-art software,” Computer Science Review, vol. 24, pp. 13–33, May 2017.
  11. A. Gosztolai and M. Barahona, “Cellular memory enhances bacterial chemotactic navigation in rugged environments,” Commun. Phys., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 47, Mar. 2020.
  12. A. J. Tjalma, V. Galstyan, J. Goedhart, L. Slim, N. B. Becker, and P. R. Ten Wolde, “Trade-offs between cost and information in cellular prediction,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 120, no. 41, p. e2303078120, Oct. 2023.
  13. J. Rode, M. Novak, and B. M. Friedrich, “Chemotactic agents combining spatial and temporal gradient-sensing boost spatial comparison if they are large, slow, and less persistent,” bioRxiv version: 2023.10.14.562229, 2023.
  14. M. Vergassola, E. Villermaux, and B. I. Shraiman, “‘Infotaxis’ as a strategy for searching without gradients,” Nature, vol. 445, no. 7126, pp. 406–409, Jan. 2007.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.