Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

End-User Development for Human-Robot Interaction (2402.17878v1)

Published 27 Feb 2024 in cs.RO and cs.HC

Abstract: End-user development (EUD) represents a key step towards making robotics accessible for experts and nonexperts alike. Within academia, researchers investigate novel ways that EUD tools can capture, represent, visualize, analyze, and test developer intent. At the same time, industry researchers increasingly build and ship programming tools that enable customers to interact with their robots. However, despite this growing interest, the role of EUD within HRI is not well defined. EUD struggles to situate itself within a growing array of alternative approaches to application development, such as robot learning and teleoperation. EUD further struggles due to the wide range of individuals who can be considered end users, such as independent third-party application developers, consumers, hobbyists, or even employees of the robot manufacturer. Key questions remain such as how EUD is justified over alternate approaches to application development, which contexts EUD is most suited for, who the target users of an EUD system are, and where interaction between a human and a robot takes place, amongst many other questions. We seek to address these challenges and questions by organizing the first End-User Development for Human-Robot Interaction (EUD4HRI) workshop at the 2024 International Conference of Human-Robot Interaction. The workshop will bring together researchers with a wide range of expertise across academia and industry, spanning perspectives from multiple subfields of robotics, with the primary goal being a consensus of perspectives about the role that EUD must play within human-robot interaction.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (11)
  1. A survey on end-user robot programming. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54, 8 (2021), 1–36.
  2. A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Robotics and autonomous systems 57, 5 (2009), 469–483.
  3. End-user development, end-user programming and end-user software engineering: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Systems and Software 149 (2019), 101–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.11.041
  4. GhostAR: A time-space editor for embodied authoring of human-robot collaborative task with augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 521–534.
  5. Javi F Gorostiza and Miguel A Salichs. 2011. End-user programming of a social robot by dialog. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 59, 12 (2011), 1102–1114.
  6. Lifelong Learning and Personalization in Long-Term Human-Robot Interaction (LEAP-HRI). In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI ’21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 724–727. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3444881
  7. Personalization in HRI: A longitudinal field experiment. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 319–326.
  8. End-user development: An emerging paradigm. In End user development. Springer, 1–8.
  9. Grounding Complex Natural Language Commands for Temporal Tasks in Unseen Environments. In Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 1084–1110. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v229/liu23d.html
  10. Authoring and verifying human-robot interactions. In Proceedings of the 31st annual acm symposium on user interface software and technology. 75–86.
  11. Choregraphe: a graphical tool for humanoid robot programming. In RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 46–51.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Laura Stegner (10 papers)
  2. David Porfirio (9 papers)
  3. Laura M. Hiatt (7 papers)
  4. Séverin Lemaignan (24 papers)
  5. Ross Mead (8 papers)
  6. Bilge Mutlu (65 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.