Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Sora: A Review on Background, Technology, Limitations, and Opportunities of Large Vision Models (2402.17177v3)

Published 27 Feb 2024 in cs.CV, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: Sora is a text-to-video generative AI model, released by OpenAI in February 2024. The model is trained to generate videos of realistic or imaginative scenes from text instructions and show potential in simulating the physical world. Based on public technical reports and reverse engineering, this paper presents a comprehensive review of the model's background, related technologies, applications, remaining challenges, and future directions of text-to-video AI models. We first trace Sora's development and investigate the underlying technologies used to build this "world simulator". Then, we describe in detail the applications and potential impact of Sora in multiple industries ranging from film-making and education to marketing. We discuss the main challenges and limitations that need to be addressed to widely deploy Sora, such as ensuring safe and unbiased video generation. Lastly, we discuss the future development of Sora and video generation models in general, and how advancements in the field could enable new ways of human-AI interaction, boosting productivity and creativity of video generation.

View on arXiv
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (191)
  1. OpenAI, “Chatgpt: Get instant answers, find creative inspiration, learn something new..” https://openai.com/chatgpt, 2022.
  2. OpenAI, “Gpt-4 technical report,” 2023.
  3. OpenAI, “Sora: Creating video from text.” https://openai.com/sora, 2024.
  4. W. Peebles and S. Xie, “Scalable diffusion models with transformers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 4195–4205, 2023.
  5. A. A. Efros and T. K. Leung, “Texture synthesis by non-parametric sampling,” in Proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on computer vision, vol. 2, pp. 1033–1038, IEEE, 1999.
  6. P. S. Heckbert, “Survey of texture mapping,” IEEE computer graphics and applications, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 56–67, 1986.
  7. I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, “Generative adversarial networks,” arXiv, 2014.
  8. D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-encoding variational bayes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013.
  9. L. Dinh, D. Krueger, and Y. Bengio, “Nice: Non-linear independent components estimation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.8516, 2014.
  10. Y. Song and S. Ermon, “Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32, 2019.
  11. Y. Cao, S. Li, Y. Liu, Z. Yan, Y. Dai, P. S. Yu, and L. Sun, “A comprehensive survey of ai-generated content (aigc): A history of generative ai from gan to chatgpt,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04226, 2023.
  12. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. u. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, eds.), vol. 30, Curran Associates, Inc., 2017.
  13. J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018.
  14. A. Radford, K. Narasimhan, T. Salimans, I. Sutskever, et al., “Improving language understanding by generative pre-training,” 2018.
  15. A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly, et al., “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  16. Z. Liu, Y. Lin, Y. Cao, H. Hu, Y. Wei, Z. Zhang, S. Lin, and B. Guo, “Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp. 10012–10022, 2021.
  17. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18, pp. 234–241, Springer, 2015.
  18. A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark, G. Krueger, and I. Sutskever, “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” 2021.
  19. R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer, “High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 10684–10695, 2022.
  20. M. AI, “Midjourney: Text to image with ai art generator.” https://www.midjourneyai.ai/en, 2023.
  21. J. Betker, G. Goh, L. Jing, T. Brooks, J. Wang, L. Li, L. Ouyang, J. Zhuang, J. Lee, Y. Guo, et al., “Improving image generation with better captions,” Computer Science. https://cdn. openai. com/papers/dall-e-3. pdf, vol. 2, p. 3, 2023.
  22. P. AI, “Pika is the idea-to-video platform that sets your creativity in motion..” https://pika.art/home, 2023.
  23. R. AI, “Gen-2: Gen-2: The next step forward for generative ai.” https://research.runwayml.com/gen2, 2023.
  24. X. Zhai, A. Kolesnikov, N. Houlsby, and L. Beyer, “Scaling vision transformers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 12104–12113, 2022.
  25. M. Dehghani, J. Djolonga, B. Mustafa, P. Padlewski, J. Heek, J. Gilmer, A. P. Steiner, M. Caron, R. Geirhos, I. Alabdulmohsin, et al., “Scaling vision transformers to 22 billion parameters,” in International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 7480–7512, PMLR, 2023.
  26. A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark, et al., “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” in International conference on machine learning, pp. 8748–8763, PMLR, 2021.
  27. A. Blattmann, T. Dockhorn, S. Kulal, D. Mendelevitch, M. Kilian, D. Lorenz, Y. Levi, Z. English, V. Voleti, A. Letts, et al., “Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023.
  28. U. Singer, A. Polyak, T. Hayes, X. Yin, J. An, S. Zhang, Q. Hu, H. Yang, O. Ashual, O. Gafni, D. Parikh, S. Gupta, and Y. Taigman, “Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data,” 2022.
  29. J. Ho, W. Chan, C. Saharia, J. Whang, R. Gao, A. Gritsenko, D. P. Kingma, B. Poole, M. Norouzi, D. J. Fleet, et al., “Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303, 2022.
  30. R. Sutton, “The bitter lesson.” http://www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html, March 2019. Accessed: Your Access Date Here.
  31. S. Xie, “Take on sora technical report.” https://twitter.com/sainingxie/status/1758433676105310543, 2024.
  32. A. Van Den Oord, O. Vinyals, et al., “Neural discrete representation learning,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  33. K. He, X. Chen, S. Xie, Y. Li, P. Dollár, and R. Girshick, “Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 16000–16009, 2022.
  34. S. Ge, S. Nah, G. Liu, T. Poon, A. Tao, B. Catanzaro, D. Jacobs, J.-B. Huang, M.-Y. Liu, and Y. Balaji, “Preserve your own correlation: A noise prior for video diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 22930–22941, 2023.
  35. A. Sauer, D. Lorenz, A. Blattmann, and R. Rombach, “Adversarial diffusion distillation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17042, 2023.
  36. A. Blattmann, R. Rombach, H. Ling, T. Dockhorn, S. W. Kim, S. Fidler, and K. Kreis, “Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with latent diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 22563–22575, 2023.
  37. M. Ryoo, A. Piergiovanni, A. Arnab, M. Dehghani, and A. Angelova, “Tokenlearner: Adaptive space-time tokenization for videos,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 12786–12797, 2021.
  38. A. Arnab, M. Dehghani, G. Heigold, C. Sun, M. Lučić, and C. Schmid, “Vivit: A video vision transformer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.15691, 2021.
  39. L. Beyer, P. Izmailov, A. Kolesnikov, M. Caron, S. Kornblith, X. Zhai, M. Minderer, M. Tschannen, I. Alabdulmohsin, and F. Pavetic, “Flexivit: One model for all patch sizes,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 14496–14506, 2023.
  40. M. Dehghani, B. Mustafa, J. Djolonga, J. Heek, M. Minderer, M. Caron, A. Steiner, J. Puigcerver, R. Geirhos, I. M. Alabdulmohsin, et al., “Patch n’pack: Navit, a vision transformer for any aspect ratio and resolution,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, 2024.
  41. M. M. Krell, M. Kosec, S. P. Perez, and A. Fitzgibbon, “Efficient sequence packing without cross-contamination: Accelerating large language models without impacting performance,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02027, 2021.
  42. H. Yin, A. Vahdat, J. M. Alvarez, A. Mallya, J. Kautz, and P. Molchanov, “A-vit: Adaptive tokens for efficient vision transformer,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10809–10818, 2022.
  43. D. Bolya, C.-Y. Fu, X. Dai, P. Zhang, C. Feichtenhofer, and J. Hoffman, “Token merging: Your vit but faster,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  44. M. Fayyaz, S. A. Koohpayegani, F. R. Jafari, S. Sengupta, H. R. V. Joze, E. Sommerlade, H. Pirsiavash, and J. Gall, “Adaptive token sampling for efficient vision transformers,” in European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 396–414, Springer, 2022.
  45. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  46. G. Bertasius, H. Wang, and L. Torresani, “Is space-time attention all you need for video understanding?,” in ICML, vol. 2, p. 4, 2021.
  47. L. Yu, J. Lezama, N. B. Gundavarapu, L. Versari, K. Sohn, D. Minnen, Y. Cheng, A. Gupta, X. Gu, A. G. Hauptmann, et al., “Language model beats diffusion–tokenizer is key to visual generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05737, 2023.
  48. N. Shazeer, “Fast transformer decoding: One write-head is all you need,” 2019.
  49. J. Ainslie, J. Lee-Thorp, M. de Jong, Y. Zemlyanskiy, F. Lebrón, and S. Sanghai, “Gqa: Training generalized multi-query transformer models from multi-head checkpoints,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13245, 2023.
  50. A. Gu and T. Dao, “Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00752, 2023.
  51. J. Sohl-Dickstein, E. A. Weiss, N. Maheswaranathan, and S. Ganguli, “Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.03585, 2015.
  52. J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020.
  53. Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole, “Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020.
  54. F. Bao, S. Nie, K. Xue, Y. Cao, C. Li, H. Su, and J. Zhu, “All are worth words: A vit backbone for diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023.
  55. S. Gao, P. Zhou, M.-M. Cheng, and S. Yan, “Masked diffusion transformer is a strong image synthesizer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14389, 2023.
  56. A. Hatamizadeh, J. Song, G. Liu, J. Kautz, and A. Vahdat, “Diffit: Diffusion vision transformers for image generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02139, 2023.
  57. J. Ho and T. Salimans, “Classifier-free diffusion guidance,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598, 2022.
  58. T. Salimans and J. Ho, “Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00512, 2022.
  59. J. Ho, C. Saharia, W. Chan, D. J. Fleet, M. Norouzi, and T. Salimans, “Cascaded diffusion models for high fidelity image generation,” The Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 2249–2281, 2022.
  60. R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer, “High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,” 2021.
  61. D. Podell, Z. English, K. Lacey, A. Blattmann, T. Dockhorn, J. Müller, J. Penna, and R. Rombach, “Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023.
  62. T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” arXiv, 2020.
  63. K. Zhou, J. Yang, C. C. Loy, and Z. Liu, “Conditional prompt learning for vision-language models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 16816–16825, 2022.
  64. V. Sanh, A. Webson, C. Raffel, S. H. Bach, L. Sutawika, Z. Alyafeai, A. Chaffin, A. Stiegler, T. L. Scao, A. Raja, et al., “Multitask prompted training enables zero-shot task generalization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08207, 2021.
  65. J. Wei, M. Bosma, V. Y. Zhao, K. Guu, A. W. Yu, B. Lester, N. Du, A. M. Dai, and Q. V. Le, “Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01652, 2021.
  66. L. Ouyang, J. Wu, X. Jiang, D. Almeida, C. Wainwright, P. Mishkin, C. Zhang, S. Agarwal, K. Slama, A. Ray, et al., “Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 27730–27744, 2022.
  67. C. Jia, Y. Yang, Y. Xia, Y.-T. Chen, Z. Parekh, H. Pham, Q. Le, Y.-H. Sung, Z. Li, and T. Duerig, “Scaling up visual and vision-language representation learning with noisy text supervision,” in International conference on machine learning, pp. 4904–4916, PMLR, 2021.
  68. J. Yu, Z. Wang, V. Vasudevan, L. Yeung, M. Seyedhosseini, and Y. Wu, “Coca: Contrastive captioners are image-text foundation models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01917, 2022.
  69. S. Yan, T. Zhu, Z. Wang, Y. Cao, M. Zhang, S. Ghosh, Y. Wu, and J. Yu, “Video-text modeling with zero-shot transfer from contrastive captioners,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04979, 2022.
  70. H. Xu, Q. Ye, M. Yan, Y. Shi, J. Ye, Y. Xu, C. Li, B. Bi, Q. Qian, W. Wang, et al., “mplug-2: A modularized multi-modal foundation model across text, image and video,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00402, 2023.
  71. J. Wang, Z. Yang, X. Hu, L. Li, K. Lin, Z. Gan, Z. Liu, C. Liu, and L. Wang, “Git: A generative image-to-text transformer for vision and language,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.14100, 2022.
  72. A. Yang, A. Miech, J. Sivic, I. Laptev, and C. Schmid, “Zero-shot video question answering via frozen bidirectional language models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 124–141, 2022.
  73. Y. Li, “A practical survey on zero-shot prompt design for in-context learning,” in Proceedings of the Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing - Large Language Models for Natural Language Processings, RANLP, INCOMA Ltd., Shoumen, BULGARIA, 2023.
  74. B. Chen, Z. Zhang, N. Langrené, and S. Zhu, “Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering in large language models: a comprehensive review,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.14735, 2023.
  75. S. Pitis, M. R. Zhang, A. Wang, and J. Ba, “Boosted prompt ensembles for large language models,” 2023.
  76. Y. Hao, Z. Chi, L. Dong, and F. Wei, “Optimizing prompts for text-to-image generation,” 2023.
  77. S. Huang, B. Gong, Y. Pan, J. Jiang, Y. Lv, Y. Li, and D. Wang, “Vop: Text-video co-operative prompt tuning for cross-modal retrieval,” 2023.
  78. J. Z. Wu, Y. Ge, X. Wang, W. Lei, Y. Gu, Y. Shi, W. Hsu, Y. Shan, X. Qie, and M. Z. Shou, “Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation,” 2023.
  79. T. Lüddecke and A. Ecker, “Image segmentation using text and image prompts,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 7086–7096, June 2022.
  80. X. Chen, Y. Wang, L. Zhang, S. Zhuang, X. Ma, J. Yu, Y. Wang, D. Lin, Y. Qiao, and Z. Liu, “Seine: Short-to-long video diffusion model for generative transition and prediction,” 2023.
  81. H. Chen, Y. Zhang, X. Cun, M. Xia, X. Wang, C. Weng, and Y. Shan, “Videocrafter2: Overcoming data limitations for high-quality video diffusion models,” 2024.
  82. T.-C. Wang, M.-Y. Liu, J.-Y. Zhu, G. Liu, A. Tao, J. Kautz, and B. Catanzaro, “Video-to-video synthesis,” 2018.
  83. T.-C. Wang, M.-Y. Liu, A. Tao, G. Liu, J. Kautz, and B. Catanzaro, “Few-shot video-to-video synthesis,” 2019.
  84. D. J. Zhang, D. Li, H. Le, M. Z. Shou, C. Xiong, and D. Sahoo, “Moonshot: Towards controllable video generation and editing with multimodal conditions,” 2024.
  85. L. Zhuo, G. Wang, S. Li, W. Wu, and Z. Liu, “Fast-vid2vid: Spatial-temporal compression for video-to-video synthesis,” 2022.
  86. P. Liu, W. Yuan, J. Fu, Z. Jiang, H. Hayashi, and G. Neubig, “Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing,” 2021.
  87. B. Lester, R. Al-Rfou, and N. Constant, “The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning,” in Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 3045–3059, 2021.
  88. M. Jia, L. Tang, B.-C. Chen, C. Cardie, S. Belongie, B. Hariharan, and S.-N. Lim, “Visual prompt tuning,” in European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 709–727, Springer, 2022.
  89. OpenAI, “Introducing chatgpt,” 2023.
  90. OpenAI, “Gpt-4v(ision) system card,” 2023.
  91. Y. Huang and L. Sun, “Harnessing the power of chatgpt in fake news: An in-depth exploration in generation, detection and explanation,” 2023.
  92. C. Chen and K. Shu, “Can llm-generated misinformation be detected?,” 2023.
  93. Z. Liu, Y. Huang, X. Yu, L. Zhang, Z. Wu, C. Cao, H. Dai, L. Zhao, Y. Li, P. Shu, F. Zeng, L. Sun, W. Liu, D. Shen, Q. Li, T. Liu, D. Zhu, and X. Li, “Deid-gpt: Zero-shot medical text de-identification by gpt-4,” 2023.
  94. J. Yao, X. Yi, X. Wang, Y. Gong, and X. Xie, “Value fulcra: Mapping large language models to the multidimensional spectrum of basic human values,” 2023.
  95. Y. Huang, Q. Zhang, P. S. Y, and L. Sun, “Trustgpt: A benchmark for trustworthy and responsible large language models,” 2023.
  96. L. Sun, Y. Huang, H. Wang, S. Wu, Q. Zhang, C. Gao, Y. Huang, W. Lyu, Y. Zhang, X. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, B. Kailkhura, C. Xiong, C. Xiao, C. Li, E. Xing, F. Huang, H. Liu, H. Ji, H. Wang, H. Zhang, H. Yao, M. Kellis, M. Zitnik, M. Jiang, M. Bansal, J. Zou, J. Pei, J. Liu, J. Gao, J. Han, J. Zhao, J. Tang, J. Wang, J. Mitchell, K. Shu, K. Xu, K.-W. Chang, L. He, L. Huang, M. Backes, N. Z. Gong, P. S. Yu, P.-Y. Chen, Q. Gu, R. Xu, R. Ying, S. Ji, S. Jana, T. Chen, T. Liu, T. Zhou, W. Wang, X. Li, X. Zhang, X. Wang, X. Xie, X. Chen, X. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Ye, Y. Cao, Y. Chen, and Y. Zhao, “Trustllm: Trustworthiness in large language models,” 2024.
  97. M. Mazeika, L. Phan, X. Yin, A. Zou, Z. Wang, N. Mu, E. Sakhaee, N. Li, S. Basart, B. Li, D. Forsyth, and D. Hendrycks, “Harmbench: A standardized evaluation framework for automated red teaming and robust refusal,” 2024.
  98. Y. Wang, H. Li, X. Han, P. Nakov, and T. Baldwin, “Do-not-answer: A dataset for evaluating safeguards in llms,” 2023.
  99. B. Wang, W. Chen, H. Pei, C. Xie, M. Kang, C. Zhang, C. Xu, Z. Xiong, R. Dutta, R. Schaeffer, et al., “Decodingtrust: A comprehensive assessment of trustworthiness in gpt models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11698, 2023.
  100. Z. Zhang, L. Lei, L. Wu, R. Sun, Y. Huang, C. Long, X. Liu, X. Lei, J. Tang, and M. Huang, “Safetybench: Evaluating the safety of large language models with multiple choice questions,” 2023.
  101. X. Shen, Z. Chen, M. Backes, Y. Shen, and Y. Zhang, “" do anything now": Characterizing and evaluating in-the-wild jailbreak prompts on large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03825, 2023.
  102. X. Liu, N. Xu, M. Chen, and C. Xiao, “Autodan: Generating stealthy jailbreak prompts on aligned large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04451, 2023.
  103. S. Zhu, R. Zhang, B. An, G. Wu, J. Barrow, Z. Wang, F. Huang, A. Nenkova, and T. Sun, “Autodan: Interpretable gradient-based adversarial attacks on large language models,” 2023.
  104. A. Zhou, B. Li, and H. Wang, “Robust prompt optimization for defending language models against jailbreaking attacks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17263, 2024.
  105. X. Guo, F. Yu, H. Zhang, L. Qin, and B. Hu, “Cold-attack: Jailbreaking llms with stealthiness and controllability,” 2024.
  106. A. Wei, N. Haghtalab, and J. Steinhardt, “Jailbroken: How does llm safety training fail?,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02483, 2023.
  107. Z. Niu, H. Ren, X. Gao, G. Hua, and R. Jin, “Jailbreaking attack against multimodal large language model,” 2024.
  108. H. Liu, W. Xue, Y. Chen, D. Chen, X. Zhao, K. Wang, L. Hou, R. Li, and W. Peng, “A survey on hallucination in large vision-language models,” 2024.
  109. T. Guan, F. Liu, X. Wu, R. Xian, Z. Li, X. Liu, X. Wang, L. Chen, F. Huang, Y. Yacoob, D. Manocha, and T. Zhou, “Hallusionbench: An advanced diagnostic suite for entangled language hallucination & visual illusion in large vision-language models,” 2023.
  110. Y. Li, Y. Du, K. Zhou, J. Wang, W. X. Zhao, and J.-R. Wen, “Evaluating object hallucination in large vision-language models,” 2023.
  111. Y. Huang, J. Shi, Y. Li, C. Fan, S. Wu, Q. Zhang, Y. Liu, P. Zhou, Y. Wan, N. Z. Gong, et al., “Metatool benchmark for large language models: Deciding whether to use tools and which to use,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03128, 2023.
  112. F. Liu, K. Lin, L. Li, J. Wang, Y. Yacoob, and L. Wang, “Mitigating hallucination in large multi-modal models via robust instruction tuning,” 2023.
  113. L. Wang, J. He, S. Li, N. Liu, and E.-P. Lim, “Mitigating fine-grained hallucination by fine-tuning large vision-language models with caption rewrites,” in International Conference on Multimedia Modeling, pp. 32–45, Springer, 2024.
  114. Y. Zhou, C. Cui, J. Yoon, L. Zhang, Z. Deng, C. Finn, M. Bansal, and H. Yao, “Analyzing and mitigating object hallucination in large vision-language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00754, 2023.
  115. I. O. Gallegos, R. A. Rossi, J. Barrow, M. M. Tanjim, S. Kim, F. Dernoncourt, T. Yu, R. Zhang, and N. K. Ahmed, “Bias and fairness in large language models: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.00770, 2023.
  116. J. Zhang, K. Bao, Y. Zhang, W. Wang, F. Feng, and X. He, “Is chatgpt fair for recommendation? evaluating fairness in large language model recommendation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07609, 2023.
  117. Y. Liang, L. Cheng, A. Payani, and K. Shu, “Beyond detection: Unveiling fairness vulnerabilities in abusive language models,” 2023.
  118. F. Friedrich, P. Schramowski, M. Brack, L. Struppek, D. Hintersdorf, S. Luccioni, and K. Kersting, “Fair diffusion: Instructing text-to-image generation models on fairness,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.10893, 2023.
  119. R. Liu, C. Jia, J. Wei, G. Xu, L. Wang, and S. Vosoughi, “Mitigating political bias in language models through reinforced calibration,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, pp. 14857–14866, May 2021.
  120. R. K. Mahabadi, Y. Belinkov, and J. Henderson, “End-to-end bias mitigation by modelling biases in corpora,” 2020.
  121. N. Mireshghallah, H. Kim, X. Zhou, Y. Tsvetkov, M. Sap, R. Shokri, and Y. Choi, “Can llms keep a secret? testing privacy implications of language models via contextual integrity theory,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17884, 2023.
  122. R. Plant, V. Giuffrida, and D. Gkatzia, “You are what you write: Preserving privacy in the era of large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.09391, 2022.
  123. H. Li, Y. Chen, J. Luo, Y. Kang, X. Zhang, Q. Hu, C. Chan, and Y. Song, “Privacy in large language models: Attacks, defenses and future directions,” 2023.
  124. R. Bommasani, D. A. Hudson, E. Adeli, R. Altman, S. Arora, S. von Arx, M. S. Bernstein, J. Bohg, A. Bosselut, E. Brunskill, E. Brynjolfsson, S. Buch, D. Card, R. Castellon, N. Chatterji, A. Chen, K. Creel, J. Q. Davis, D. Demszky, C. Donahue, M. Doumbouya, E. Durmus, S. Ermon, J. Etchemendy, K. Ethayarajh, L. Fei-Fei, C. Finn, T. Gale, L. Gillespie, K. Goel, N. Goodman, S. Grossman, N. Guha, T. Hashimoto, P. Henderson, J. Hewitt, D. E. Ho, J. Hong, K. Hsu, J. Huang, T. Icard, S. Jain, D. Jurafsky, P. Kalluri, S. Karamcheti, G. Keeling, F. Khani, O. Khattab, P. W. Koh, M. Krass, R. Krishna, R. Kuditipudi, A. Kumar, F. Ladhak, M. Lee, T. Lee, J. Leskovec, I. Levent, X. L. Li, X. Li, T. Ma, A. Malik, C. D. Manning, S. Mirchandani, E. Mitchell, Z. Munyikwa, S. Nair, A. Narayan, D. Narayanan, B. Newman, A. Nie, J. C. Niebles, H. Nilforoshan, J. Nyarko, G. Ogut, L. Orr, I. Papadimitriou, J. S. Park, C. Piech, E. Portelance, C. Potts, A. Raghunathan, R. Reich, H. Ren, F. Rong, Y. Roohani, C. Ruiz, J. Ryan, C. Ré, D. Sadigh, S. Sagawa, K. Santhanam, A. Shih, K. Srinivasan, A. Tamkin, R. Taori, A. W. Thomas, F. Tramèr, R. E. Wang, W. Wang, B. Wu, J. Wu, Y. Wu, S. M. Xie, M. Yasunaga, J. You, M. Zaharia, M. Zhang, T. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, L. Zheng, K. Zhou, and P. Liang, “On the opportunities and risks of foundation models,” 2022.
  125. T. Shen, R. Jin, Y. Huang, C. Liu, W. Dong, Z. Guo, X. Wu, Y. Liu, and D. Xiong, “Large language model alignment: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15025, 2023.
  126. X. Liu, X. Lei, S. Wang, Y. Huang, Z. Feng, B. Wen, J. Cheng, P. Ke, Y. Xu, W. L. Tam, X. Zhang, L. Sun, H. Wang, J. Zhang, M. Huang, Y. Dong, and J. Tang, “Alignbench: Benchmarking chinese alignment of large language models,” 2023.
  127. P. Christiano, J. Leike, T. B. Brown, M. Martic, S. Legg, and D. Amodei, “Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences,” 2023.
  128. T. Yu, Y. Yao, H. Zhang, T. He, Y. Han, G. Cui, J. Hu, Z. Liu, H.-T. Zheng, M. Sun, and T.-S. Chua, “Rlhf-v: Towards trustworthy mllms via behavior alignment from fine-grained correctional human feedback,” 2023.
  129. M. S. Jahan and M. Oussalah, “A systematic review of hate speech automatic detection using natural language processing.,” Neurocomputing, p. 126232, 2023.
  130. OpenAI, “Sora safety.” https://openai.com/sora#safety, 2024.
  131. Z. Fei, X. Shen, D. Zhu, F. Zhou, Z. Han, S. Zhang, K. Chen, Z. Shen, and J. Ge, “Lawbench: Benchmarking legal knowledge of large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16289, 2023.
  132. Y. Li, Y. Huang, Y. Lin, S. Wu, Y. Wan, and L. Sun, “I think, therefore i am: Benchmarking awareness of large language models using awarebench,” 2024.
  133. J. Zhu, H. Yang, H. He, W. Wang, Z. Tuo, W.-H. Cheng, L. Gao, J. Song, and J. Fu, “Moviefactory: Automatic movie creation from text using large generative models for language and images,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.07257, 2023.
  134. J. Zhu, H. Yang, W. Wang, H. He, Z. Tuo, Y. Yu, W.-H. Cheng, L. Gao, J. Song, J. Fu, et al., “Mobilevidfactory: Automatic diffusion-based social media video generation for mobile devices from text,” in Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 9371–9373, 2023.
  135. S. Zhuang, K. Li, X. Chen, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, Y. Qiao, and Y. Wang, “Vlogger: Make your dream a vlog,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09414, 2024.
  136. R. Feng, W. Weng, Y. Wang, Y. Yuan, J. Bao, C. Luo, Z. Chen, and B. Guo, “Ccedit: Creative and controllable video editing via diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16496, 2023.
  137. J. Xing, M. Xia, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. He, H. Liu, H. Chen, X. Cun, X. Wang, et al., “Make-your-video: Customized video generation using textual and structural guidance,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00943, 2023.
  138. Y. Guo, C. Yang, A. Rao, Y. Wang, Y. Qiao, D. Lin, and B. Dai, “Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725, 2023.
  139. Y. He, M. Xia, H. Chen, X. Cun, Y. Gong, J. Xing, Y. Zhang, X. Wang, C. Weng, Y. Shan, et al., “Animate-a-story: Storytelling with retrieval-augmented video generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06940, 2023.
  140. H. Ni, C. Shi, K. Li, S. X. Huang, and M. R. Min, “Conditional image-to-video generation with latent flow diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 18444–18455, 2023.
  141. L. Hu, X. Gao, P. Zhang, K. Sun, B. Zhang, and L. Bo, “Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17117, 2023.
  142. Y. Hu, C. Luo, and Z. Chen, “Make it move: controllable image-to-video generation with text descriptions,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 18219–18228, 2022.
  143. K. Mei and V. Patel, “Vidm: Video implicit diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, pp. 9117–9125, 2023.
  144. S. Yu, K. Sohn, S. Kim, and J. Shin, “Video probabilistic diffusion models in projected latent space,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 18456–18466, 2023.
  145. K. Su, K. Qian, E. Shlizerman, A. Torralba, and C. Gan, “Physics-driven diffusion models for impact sound synthesis from videos,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9749–9759, 2023.
  146. S. Li, W. Dong, Y. Zhang, F. Tang, C. Ma, O. Deussen, T.-Y. Lee, and C. Xu, “Dance-to-music generation with encoder-based textual inversion of diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17800, 2024.
  147. A. Awasthi, J. Nizam, S. Zare, S. Ahmad, M. J. Montalvo, N. Varadarajan, B. Roysam, and H. V. Nguyen, “Video diffusion models for the apoptosis forcasting,” bioRxiv, pp. 2023–11, 2023.
  148. A. Bozorgpour, Y. Sadegheih, A. Kazerouni, R. Azad, and D. Merhof, “Dermosegdiff: A boundary-aware segmentation diffusion model for skin lesion delineation,” in International Workshop on PRedictive Intelligence In MEdicine, pp. 146–158, Springer, 2023.
  149. A. Flaborea, L. Collorone, G. M. D. di Melendugno, S. D’Arrigo, B. Prenkaj, and F. Galasso, “Multimodal motion conditioned diffusion model for skeleton-based video anomaly detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 10318–10329, 2023.
  150. J. Wu, R. Fu, H. Fang, Y. Zhang, and Y. Xu, “Medsegdiff-v2: Diffusion based medical image segmentation with transformer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11798, 2023.
  151. G. J. Chowdary and Z. Yin, “Diffusion transformer u-net for medical image segmentation,” in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 622–631, Springer, 2023.
  152. I. Kapelyukh, V. Vosylius, and E. Johns, “Dall-e-bot: Introducing web-scale diffusion models to robotics,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2023.
  153. W. Liu, T. Hermans, S. Chernova, and C. Paxton, “Structdiffusion: Object-centric diffusion for semantic rearrangement of novel objects,” in Workshop on Language and Robotics at CoRL 2022, 2022.
  154. M. Janner, Y. Du, J. B. Tenenbaum, and S. Levine, “Planning with diffusion for flexible behavior synthesis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.09991, 2022.
  155. A. Ajay, Y. Du, A. Gupta, J. Tenenbaum, T. Jaakkola, and P. Agrawal, “Is conditional generative modeling all you need for decision-making?,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15657, 2022.
  156. J. Carvalho, A. T. Le, M. Baierl, D. Koert, and J. Peters, “Motion planning diffusion: Learning and planning of robot motions with diffusion models,” in 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1916–1923, IEEE, 2023.
  157. X. Gu, C. Wen, J. Song, and Y. Gao, “Seer: Language instructed video prediction with latent diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14897, 2023.
  158. Z. Chen, S. Kiami, A. Gupta, and V. Kumar, “Genaug: Retargeting behaviors to unseen situations via generative augmentation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06671, 2023.
  159. Z. Mandi, H. Bharadhwaj, V. Moens, S. Song, A. Rajeswaran, and V. Kumar, “Cacti: A framework for scalable multi-task multi-scene visual imitation learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.05711, 2022.
  160. T. Chen, L. Li, S. Saxena, G. Hinton, and D. J. Fleet, “A generalist framework for panoptic segmentation of images and videos,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 909–919, 2023.
  161. W. Harvey, S. Naderiparizi, V. Masrani, C. Weilbach, and F. Wood, “Flexible diffusion modeling of long videos,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 27953–27965, 2022.
  162. A. Gupta, S. Tian, Y. Zhang, J. Wu, R. Martín-Martín, and L. Fei-Fei, “Maskvit: Masked visual pre-training for video prediction,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.11894, 2022.
  163. W. Hong, M. Ding, W. Zheng, X. Liu, and J. Tang, “Cogvideo: Large-scale pretraining for text-to-video generation via transformers,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15868, 2022.
  164. U. Singer, A. Polyak, T. Hayes, X. Yin, J. An, S. Zhang, Q. Hu, H. Yang, O. Ashual, O. Gafni, et al., “Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792, 2022.
  165. D. Zhou, W. Wang, H. Yan, W. Lv, Y. Zhu, and J. Feng, “Magicvideo: Efficient video generation with latent diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11018, 2022.
  166. S. Ge, T. Hayes, H. Yang, X. Yin, G. Pang, D. Jacobs, J.-B. Huang, and D. Parikh, “Long video generation with time-agnostic vqgan and time-sensitive transformer,” in European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 102–118, Springer, 2022.
  167. R. Villegas, M. Babaeizadeh, P.-J. Kindermans, H. Moraldo, H. Zhang, M. T. Saffar, S. Castro, J. Kunze, and D. Erhan, “Phenaki: Variable length video generation from open domain textual description,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02399, 2022.
  168. P. Esser, J. Chiu, P. Atighehchian, J. Granskog, and A. Germanidis, “Structure and content-guided video synthesis with diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 7346–7356, 2023.
  169. L. Khachatryan, A. Movsisyan, V. Tadevosyan, R. Henschel, Z. Wang, S. Navasardyan, and H. Shi, “Text2video-zero: Text-to-image diffusion models are zero-shot video generators,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13439, 2023.
  170. Z. Luo, D. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Huang, L. Wang, Y. Shen, D. Zhao, J. Zhou, and T. Tan, “Videofusion: Decomposed diffusion models for high-quality video generation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10209–10218, 2023.
  171. A. Jabri, D. Fleet, and T. Chen, “Scalable adaptive computation for iterative generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.11972, 2022.
  172. L. Lian, B. Shi, A. Yala, T. Darrell, and B. Li, “Llm-grounded video diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17444, 2023.
  173. E. Molad, E. Horwitz, D. Valevski, A. R. Acha, Y. Matias, Y. Pritch, Y. Leviathan, and Y. Hoshen, “Dreamix: Video diffusion models are general video editors,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01329, 2023.
  174. J. H. Liew, H. Yan, J. Zhang, Z. Xu, and J. Feng, “Magicedit: High-fidelity and temporally coherent video editing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14749, 2023.
  175. W. Chen, J. Wu, P. Xie, H. Wu, J. Li, X. Xia, X. Xiao, and L. Lin, “Control-a-video: Controllable text-to-video generation with diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13840, 2023.
  176. W. Chai, X. Guo, G. Wang, and Y. Lu, “Stablevideo: Text-driven consistency-aware diffusion video editing,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 23040–23050, 2023.
  177. S. Yang, Y. Zhou, Z. Liu, and C. C. Loy, “Rerender a video: Zero-shot text-guided video-to-video translation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.07954, 2023.
  178. D. Ceylan, C.-H. P. Huang, and N. J. Mitra, “Pix2video: Video editing using image diffusion,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 23206–23217, 2023.
  179. B. Qin, J. Li, S. Tang, T.-S. Chua, and Y. Zhuang, “Instructvid2vid: Controllable video editing with natural language instructions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12328, 2023.
  180. D. Liu, Q. Li, A.-D. Dinh, T. Jiang, M. Shah, and C. Xu, “Diffusion action segmentation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 10139–10149, 2023.
  181. R. Feng, Y. Gao, T. H. E. Tse, X. Ma, and H. J. Chang, “Diffpose: Spatiotemporal diffusion model for video-based human pose estimation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 14861–14872, 2023.
  182. L. Yu, Y. Cheng, K. Sohn, J. Lezama, H. Zhang, H. Chang, A. G. Hauptmann, M.-H. Yang, Y. Hao, I. Essa, et al., “Magvit: Masked generative video transformer,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10459–10469, 2023.
  183. Z. Li, R. Tucker, N. Snavely, and A. Holynski, “Generative image dynamics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07906, 2023.
  184. EasyWithAI, “Zeroscope - ai text-to-video model.” https://easywithai.com/ai-video-generators/zeroscope/, 2023.
  185. R. Girdhar, M. Singh, A. Brown, Q. Duval, S. Azadi, S. S. Rambhatla, A. Shah, X. Yin, D. Parikh, and I. Misra, “Emu video: Factorizing text-to-video generation by explicit image conditioning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10709, 2023.
  186. Y. Zeng, G. Wei, J. Zheng, J. Zou, Y. Wei, Y. Zhang, and H. Li, “Make pixels dance: High-dynamic video generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10982, 2023.
  187. A. Gupta, L. Yu, K. Sohn, X. Gu, M. Hahn, L. Fei-Fei, I. Essa, L. Jiang, and J. Lezama, “Photorealistic video generation with diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06662, 2023.
  188. B. Wu, C.-Y. Chuang, X. Wang, Y. Jia, K. Krishnakumar, T. Xiao, F. Liang, L. Yu, and P. Vajda, “Fairy: Fast parallelized instruction-guided video-to-video synthesis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.13834, 2023.
  189. D. Kondratyuk, L. Yu, X. Gu, J. Lezama, J. Huang, R. Hornung, H. Adam, H. Akbari, Y. Alon, V. Birodkar, et al., “Videopoet: A large language model for zero-shot video generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14125, 2023.
  190. J. Wu, X. Li, C. Si, S. Zhou, J. Yang, J. Zhang, Y. Li, K. Chen, Y. Tong, Z. Liu, et al., “Towards language-driven video inpainting via multimodal large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10226, 2024.
  191. O. Bar-Tal, H. Chefer, O. Tov, C. Herrmann, R. Paiss, S. Zada, A. Ephrat, J. Hur, Y. Li, T. Michaeli, et al., “Lumiere: A space-time diffusion model for video generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12945, 2024.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (12)
  1. Yixin Liu (108 papers)
  2. Kai Zhang (542 papers)
  3. Yuan Li (393 papers)
  4. Zhiling Yan (12 papers)
  5. Chujie Gao (9 papers)
  6. Ruoxi Chen (22 papers)
  7. Zhengqing Yuan (17 papers)
  8. Yue Huang (171 papers)
  9. Hanchi Sun (4 papers)
  10. Jianfeng Gao (344 papers)
  11. Lifang He (98 papers)
  12. Lichao Sun (186 papers)
Citations (150)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

Comprehensive Analysis of Sora: Large Vision Model for Generative Text-to-Video

Overview of Sora

Sora represents an advancement in text-to-video generative AI models, capable of producing videos from text instructions. This model, developed by OpenAI, stands out for its ability to generate up to one-minute-long, high-quality videos that accurately adhere to user instructions. By leveraging a diffusion transformer architecture, Sora marks a significant leap in the field of generative AI, bridging the gap between the complexity of video generation and the expressive power of text prompts.

Technology Behind Sora

The model's architecture combines several key technologies, including spacetime latent patches, video compression networks, and diffusion transformers. These components work in tandem to efficiently process and generate video content. The approach differs fundamentally from prior models by training directly on data at its native resolution, which contributes to the model's ability to produce visually coherent and detailed videos. This section also discusses the potential implementation strategies and the trade-offs involved in designing such a sophisticated model.

Applications of Sora

Sora's utility spans various industries from filmmaking and education to healthcare and robotics. In filmmaking, the model offers a new pathway to movie creation, enabling the generation of complex scenes directly from scripts. For education, the model can transform instructional content into immersive video format, enhancing learning experiences. In healthcare, the ability to simulate medical scenarios through video aids in training and diagnosis processes. The model's influence also extends to robotics, where video generation aids in creating realistic simulation environments for training AI systems.

Challenges and Future Directions

Despite its capabilities, the model encounters limitations regarding physical realism and human-computer interaction. There's room for improvement in simulating physical interactions within generated videos and refining the model’s ability to follow complex instructions precisely. The discussion extends to ethical considerations, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that the generative capabilities of models like Sora are used responsibly. Looking forward, the model's development trajectory suggests ample scope for enhancing its realism, reducing computational demands, and expanding its application spectrum.

Trustworthiness and Ethical Use

Addressing safety and ethical use, the paper highlights the challenge of ensuring that Sora and similar models are utilized responsibly. The authors call for enhanced security measures and the development of methodologies to mitigate misuse. They underscore the necessity for interdisciplinary collaboration to address these concerns comprehensively, encompassing legal, psychological, and technological expertise.

Conclusion

Sora embodies a significant advancement in generative AI, offering a glimpse into the future of video generation technologies. While challenges remain, particularly in the realms of realism, ethical use, and computational efficiency, the model's development indicates a promising direction for the field. The paper concludes with an invitation to the research community for ongoing collaboration to refine and harness the potential of text-to-video models like Sora responsibly.

This comprehensive review, grounded in the examination of Sora’s architecture, capabilities, and potential applications, alongside its limitations and ethical considerations, provides a foundational understanding for both researchers and practitioners. It sets the stage for future exploration and innovation in the rapidly evolving domain of generative AI.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube