Large Language Model for Participatory Urban Planning (2402.17161v1)
Abstract: Participatory urban planning is the mainstream of modern urban planning that involves the active engagement of residents. However, the traditional participatory paradigm requires experienced planning experts and is often time-consuming and costly. Fortunately, the emerging LLMs have shown considerable ability to simulate human-like agents, which can be used to emulate the participatory process easily. In this work, we introduce an LLM-based multi-agent collaboration framework for participatory urban planning, which can generate land-use plans for urban regions considering the diverse needs of residents. Specifically, we construct LLM agents to simulate a planner and thousands of residents with diverse profiles and backgrounds. We first ask the planner to carry out an initial land-use plan. To deal with the different facilities needs of residents, we initiate a discussion among the residents in each community about the plan, where residents provide feedback based on their profiles. Furthermore, to improve the efficiency of discussion, we adopt a fishbowl discussion mechanism, where part of the residents discuss and the rest of them act as listeners in each round. Finally, we let the planner modify the plan based on residents' feedback. We deploy our method on two real-world regions in Beijing. Experiments show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in residents satisfaction and inclusion metrics, and also outperforms human experts in terms of service accessibility and ecology metrics.
- A systematic literature review on public participation in decision-making for local authority planning: A decade of progress and challenges. Environmental Development 46 (2023), 100853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100853
- Saeed Ahmadi Oloonabadi and Perver Baran. 2023. Augmented reality participatory platform: A novel digital participatory planning tool to engage under-resourced communities in improving neighborhood walkability. Cities 141 (2023), 104441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104441
- Anonymous. 2024. Chain-of-Experts: When LLMs Meet Complex Operations Research Problems. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=HobyL1B9CZ
- Sherry R. Arnstein. 1969. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35, 4 (1969), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
- Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics and Survey Office of the National Bureau of Statistics in Bejing. 2022. Beijing Population Census Yearbook: 2020. China Statistics Press. https://nj.tjj.beijing.gov.cn/tjnj/rkpc-2020/indexch.htm
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate. arXiv:2308.07201 [cs.CL]
- Experiencing virtual geographic environment in urban 3D participatory e-planning: A user perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning 224 (2022), 104432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104432
- AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors. arXiv:2308.10848 [cs.CL]
- Artificial intelligence enabled participatory planning: a review. International Journal of Urban Sciences 0, 0 (2023), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2023.2262427
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14325 (2023).
- Amira Fredriksson Erik Eriksson and Josefina Syssner. 2022. Opening the black box of participatory planning: a study of how planners handle citizens’ input. European Planning Studies 30, 6 (2022), 994–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1895974
- John Forester. 1982. Planning in the Face of Power. Journal of the American Planning Association 48, 1 (1982), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976167
- J. Forester. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. MIT Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=ywJXreTLoBcC
- Peter Gordon and Harry W. Richardson. 1997. Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal? Journal of the American Planning Association 63, 1 (1997), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975727
- MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework. arXiv:2308.00352 [cs.AI]
- A demonstrator tool of web-based virtual reality for participatory evaluation of urban sound environment. Landscape and Urban Planning 170 (2018), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.007
- Integrating urban analysis, generative design, and evolutionary optimization for solving urban design problems. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47, 6 (2020), 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319894986
- CAMEL: Communicative Agents for ”Mind” Exploration of Large Language Model Society. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. https://openreview.net/forum?id=3IyL2XWDkG
- Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino, and Kalika Bali (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Singapore, 180–192. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.13
- Collaborative workshop and community participation: A new approach to urban regeneration in China. Cities 102 (2020), 102743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102743
- Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19118 (2023).
- Jiayan Liu. 2022. Participatory Community Planning and Design Toolkit. China Architecture & Building Press.
- Towards the collaborative development of machine learning techniques in planning support systems – a Sydney example. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 48, 3 (2021), 484–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320939974
- Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities. Smart Cities 4, 1 (2021), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006
- Is the rapid development of visualization techniques enhancing the quality of public participation in natural resource policy and management? A systematic review. Landscape and Urban Planning 228 (2022), 104586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104586
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿San Francisco¡/city¿, ¡state¿CA¡/state¿, ¡country¿USA¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (UIST ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586183.3606763
- CivRealm: A Learning and Reasoning Odyssey in Civilization for Decision-Making Agents. arXiv:2401.10568 [cs.AI]
- AI Agent as Urban Planner: Steering Stakeholder Dynamics in Urban Planning via Consensus-based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. arXiv:2310.16772 [cs.AI]
- Steven Jige Quan. 2022. Urban-GAN: An artificial intelligence-aided computation system for plural urban design. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49, 9 (2022), 2500–2515. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221100550
- Evaluating the strategy of decentralized urban land-use planning in a developing region. Land Use Policy 48 (2015), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.004
- Citizen-Centered Design in Urban Planning: How Augmented Reality can be used in Citizen Participation Processes. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462130
- Role play with large language models. Nature 623, 7987 (2023), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06647-8
- A participatory e-planning model in the urban renewal of China: Implications of technologies in facilitating planning participation. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 50, 2 (2023), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221111163
- Deep Human-guided Conditional Variational Generative Modeling for Automated Urban Planning. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM51629.2021.00079
- Ran Wei. 2016. Coverage Location Models: Alternatives, Approximation, and Uncertainty. International Regional Science Review 39, 1 (2016), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017615571588
- AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation. arXiv:2308.08155 [cs.AI]
- Thought Propagation: An Analogical Approach to Complex Reasoning with Large Language Models. arXiv:2310.03965 [cs.AI]
- Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View. arXiv:2310.02124 [cs.CL]
- Spatial planning of urban communities via deep reinforcement learning. Nature Computational Science 3, 9 (2023), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00503-5