Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Large Language Model for Participatory Urban Planning (2402.17161v1)

Published 27 Feb 2024 in cs.AI and cs.MA

Abstract: Participatory urban planning is the mainstream of modern urban planning that involves the active engagement of residents. However, the traditional participatory paradigm requires experienced planning experts and is often time-consuming and costly. Fortunately, the emerging LLMs have shown considerable ability to simulate human-like agents, which can be used to emulate the participatory process easily. In this work, we introduce an LLM-based multi-agent collaboration framework for participatory urban planning, which can generate land-use plans for urban regions considering the diverse needs of residents. Specifically, we construct LLM agents to simulate a planner and thousands of residents with diverse profiles and backgrounds. We first ask the planner to carry out an initial land-use plan. To deal with the different facilities needs of residents, we initiate a discussion among the residents in each community about the plan, where residents provide feedback based on their profiles. Furthermore, to improve the efficiency of discussion, we adopt a fishbowl discussion mechanism, where part of the residents discuss and the rest of them act as listeners in each round. Finally, we let the planner modify the plan based on residents' feedback. We deploy our method on two real-world regions in Beijing. Experiments show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in residents satisfaction and inclusion metrics, and also outperforms human experts in terms of service accessibility and ecology metrics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. A systematic literature review on public participation in decision-making for local authority planning: A decade of progress and challenges. Environmental Development 46 (2023), 100853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100853
  2. Saeed Ahmadi Oloonabadi and Perver Baran. 2023. Augmented reality participatory platform: A novel digital participatory planning tool to engage under-resourced communities in improving neighborhood walkability. Cities 141 (2023), 104441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104441
  3. Anonymous. 2024. Chain-of-Experts: When LLMs Meet Complex Operations Research Problems. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=HobyL1B9CZ
  4. Sherry R. Arnstein. 1969. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35, 4 (1969), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
  5. Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics and Survey Office of the National Bureau of Statistics in Bejing. 2022. Beijing Population Census Yearbook: 2020. China Statistics Press. https://nj.tjj.beijing.gov.cn/tjnj/rkpc-2020/indexch.htm
  6. ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate. arXiv:2308.07201 [cs.CL]
  7. Experiencing virtual geographic environment in urban 3D participatory e-planning: A user perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning 224 (2022), 104432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104432
  8. AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors. arXiv:2308.10848 [cs.CL]
  9. Artificial intelligence enabled participatory planning: a review. International Journal of Urban Sciences 0, 0 (2023), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2023.2262427
  10. Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14325 (2023).
  11. Amira Fredriksson Erik Eriksson and Josefina Syssner. 2022. Opening the black box of participatory planning: a study of how planners handle citizens’ input. European Planning Studies 30, 6 (2022), 994–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1895974
  12. John Forester. 1982. Planning in the Face of Power. Journal of the American Planning Association 48, 1 (1982), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976167
  13. J. Forester. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. MIT Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=ywJXreTLoBcC
  14. Peter Gordon and Harry W. Richardson. 1997. Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal? Journal of the American Planning Association 63, 1 (1997), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975727
  15. MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework. arXiv:2308.00352 [cs.AI]
  16. A demonstrator tool of web-based virtual reality for participatory evaluation of urban sound environment. Landscape and Urban Planning 170 (2018), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.007
  17. Integrating urban analysis, generative design, and evolutionary optimization for solving urban design problems. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47, 6 (2020), 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319894986
  18. CAMEL: Communicative Agents for ”Mind” Exploration of Large Language Model Society. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. https://openreview.net/forum?id=3IyL2XWDkG
  19. Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino, and Kalika Bali (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Singapore, 180–192. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.13
  20. Collaborative workshop and community participation: A new approach to urban regeneration in China. Cities 102 (2020), 102743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102743
  21. Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19118 (2023).
  22. Jiayan Liu. 2022. Participatory Community Planning and Design Toolkit. China Architecture & Building Press.
  23. Towards the collaborative development of machine learning techniques in planning support systems – a Sydney example. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 48, 3 (2021), 484–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320939974
  24. Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities. Smart Cities 4, 1 (2021), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006
  25. Is the rapid development of visualization techniques enhancing the quality of public participation in natural resource policy and management? A systematic review. Landscape and Urban Planning 228 (2022), 104586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104586
  26. Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿San Francisco¡/city¿, ¡state¿CA¡/state¿, ¡country¿USA¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (UIST ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586183.3606763
  27. CivRealm: A Learning and Reasoning Odyssey in Civilization for Decision-Making Agents. arXiv:2401.10568 [cs.AI]
  28. AI Agent as Urban Planner: Steering Stakeholder Dynamics in Urban Planning via Consensus-based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. arXiv:2310.16772 [cs.AI]
  29. Steven Jige Quan. 2022. Urban-GAN: An artificial intelligence-aided computation system for plural urban design. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49, 9 (2022), 2500–2515. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221100550
  30. Evaluating the strategy of decentralized urban land-use planning in a developing region. Land Use Policy 48 (2015), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.004
  31. Citizen-Centered Design in Urban Planning: How Augmented Reality can be used in Citizen Participation Processes. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462130
  32. Role play with large language models. Nature 623, 7987 (2023), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06647-8
  33. A participatory e-planning model in the urban renewal of China: Implications of technologies in facilitating planning participation. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 50, 2 (2023), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221111163
  34. Deep Human-guided Conditional Variational Generative Modeling for Automated Urban Planning. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM51629.2021.00079
  35. Ran Wei. 2016. Coverage Location Models: Alternatives, Approximation, and Uncertainty. International Regional Science Review 39, 1 (2016), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017615571588
  36. AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation. arXiv:2308.08155 [cs.AI]
  37. Thought Propagation: An Analogical Approach to Complex Reasoning with Large Language Models. arXiv:2310.03965 [cs.AI]
  38. Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View. arXiv:2310.02124 [cs.CL]
  39. Spatial planning of urban communities via deep reinforcement learning. Nature Computational Science 3, 9 (2023), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00503-5
Citations (12)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.