Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Pretrained Visual Uncertainties (2402.16569v2)

Published 26 Feb 2024 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: Accurate uncertainty estimation is vital to trustworthy machine learning, yet uncertainties typically have to be learned for each task anew. This work introduces the first pretrained uncertainty modules for vision models. Similar to standard pretraining this enables the zero-shot transfer of uncertainties learned on a large pretraining dataset to specialized downstream datasets. We enable our large-scale pretraining on ImageNet-21k by solving a gradient conflict in previous uncertainty modules and accelerating the training by up to 180x. We find that the pretrained uncertainties generalize to unseen datasets. In scrutinizing the learned uncertainties, we find that they capture aleatoric uncertainty, disentangled from epistemic components. We demonstrate that this enables safe retrieval and uncertainty-aware dataset visualization. To encourage applications to further problems and domains, we release all pretrained checkpoints and code under https://github.com/mkirchhof/url .

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. A gentle introduction to conformal prediction and distribution-free uncertainty quantification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.07511, 2022.
  2. Are we done with ImageNet? arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.07159, 2020.
  3. Symbolic discovery of optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06675, 2023.
  4. Chun, S. Improved probabilistic image-text representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18171, 2023.
  5. Describing textures in the wild. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2014.
  6. Massively scaling heteroscedastic classifiers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12860, 2023.
  7. Learning sample difficulty from pre-trained models for reliable prediction. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023.
  8. Scaling vision transformers to 22 billion parameters. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2023.
  9. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2009.
  10. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2021.
  11. The Faiss library. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.08281, 2024.
  12. Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental Bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, 2004.
  13. A framework for benchmarking class-out-of-distribution detection and its application to ImageNet. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023a.
  14. What can we learn from the selective prediction and uncertainty estimation performance of 523 ImageNet classifiers? In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023b.
  15. AugMix: A simple method to improve robustness and uncertainty under data shift. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2020.
  16. Probabilistic embeddings revisited. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.06768, 2022.
  17. Probabilistic concept bottleneck models. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
  18. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2015.
  19. A non-isotropic probabilistic take on proxy-based deep metric learning. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022.
  20. Probabilistic contrastive learning recovers the correct aleatoric uncertainty of ambiguous inputs. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2023a.
  21. Url: A representation learning benchmark for transferable uncertainty estimates. Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks, 2023b.
  22. 3D object representations for fine-grained categorization. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshop, 2013.
  23. Krizhevsky, A. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. Technical report, 2009.
  24. DEUP: Direct epistemic uncertainty prediction. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR), 2023. ISSN 2835-8856.
  25. Well-calibrated regression uncertainty in medical imaging with deep learning. In Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, pp.  393–412. PMLR, 2020.
  26. Simple and principled uncertainty estimation with deterministic deep learning via distance awareness. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2020.
  27. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017.
  28. UMAP: Uniform manifold approximation and projection. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(29):861, 2018. doi: 10.21105/joss.00861. URL https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00861.
  29. Trustworthy machine learning, 2023.
  30. Representation uncertainty in self-supervised learning as variational inference. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023.
  31. Reading digits in natural images with unsupervised feature learning. 2011.
  32. Automated flower classification over a large number of classes. In Proceedings of the Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 2008.
  33. Modeling uncertainty with hedged instance embeddings. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2019.
  34. Can you trust your model’s uncertainty? Evaluating predictive uncertainty under dataset shift. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 32, 2019.
  35. Cats and dogs. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012.
  36. On the practicality of deterministic epistemic uncertainty. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2022.
  37. Is one annotation enough? A data-centric image classification benchmark for noisy and ambiguous label estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.06214, 2022.
  38. Deep metric learning via lifted structured feature embedding. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.
  39. How to train your ViT? Data, augmentation, and regularization in vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10270, 2021.
  40. TorchVision. Torchvision: Pytorch’s computer vision library. GitHub repository: https://github.com/pytorch/vision, 2016.
  41. Plex: Towards reliability using pretrained large model extensions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07411, 2022.
  42. A deeper look into aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty disentanglement. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2022.
  43. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), 9(86):2579–2605, 2008.
  44. The Caltech-UCSD birds-200-2011 dataset. Technical Report CNS-TR-2011-001, California Institute of Technology, 2011.
  45. Wightman, R. PyTorch image models, 2019.
  46. Quantifying aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: Are conditional entropy and mutual information appropriate measures? In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), 2023.
  47. Sun database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010.
  48. Learning loss for active learning. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019.
  49. Cutmix: Regularization strategy to train strong classifiers with localizable features. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019.
  50. A large-scale study of representation learning with the visual task adaptation benchmark, 2020.
  51. Mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2018.
Citations (4)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a pretrained uncertainty module that improves vision model reliability by resolving gradient conflicts and enabling zero-shot transfer.
  • It integrates an auxiliary uncertainty head with stopgrad and massive caching techniques that boost training speed by up to 180x.
  • Empirical results across diverse datasets confirm enhanced uncertainty estimation and overall model performance without compromising task accuracy.

Pretrained Uncertainty Modules for Vision Models Enhance Trustworthiness in Machine Learning

Introduction

Accurate assessment of uncertainty in predictions is essential for advancing the reliability and trustworthiness of machine learning models. This paper extends the field by introducing the first pretrained uncertainty modules for vision models, capable of transferring to specialized downstream datasets in a zero-shot manner. Leveraging large-scale pretraining on ImageNet-21k and addressing historical challenges such as gradient conflict in uncertainty estimation, the authors have significantly reduced training time while enabling model scalability.

Solution Overview

The paper presents a novel approach to incorporate uncertainty estimates within vision models without compromising the primary task performance or efficiency. The key contributions include:

  • The development of a pretrained module capable of generalizing across different tasks and datasets, ensuring minimal overhead and flexible adaptation.
  • Addressing gradient conflict issues that have plagued prior uncertainty estimation techniques, thereby enhancing training stability and model performance.
  • The introduction of techniques such as massive caching and scale-free uncertainties that not only speed up training by a significant margin but also ensure that the uncertainties are applicable regardless of the task loss scale.

Methodological Advancements

At the heart of their approach is an enhancement to the traditional loss prediction model, which involves specifying an auxiliary uncertainty head alongside the primary model task. This methodology is distinguished by several strategic adjustments:

  1. Stopgrad Technique: A pivotal modification that ensures the uncertainty predictive module does not adversely affect the primary task gradient updates.
  2. Absence of Early Stopping: By resolving the gradient interference issue, the need for early training cessation is obviated, facilitating full model convergence.
  3. Efficient Use of Caching: By caching intermediate representations, the training process for uncertainty estimation is expedited, boasting up to 180x speed improvement.
  4. Scale-Free Uncertainty: Through a ranking-based objective, uncertainties are decoupled from the loss scale, enhancing model flexibility across various tasks.

These enhancements allow for the pretrained uncertainty modules to achieve notable zero-shot transfer capabilities, rigorously demonstrated across multiple unparalleled datasets.

Empirical Evidence

Extensive experimentation confirms the robust generalizability and efficacy of the proposed pretrained uncertainties. When evaluated on unseen datasets, the pretrained modules consistently achieved superior performance in uncertainty estimation. The method sets a new benchmark on the Uncertainty-Aware Representation Learning (URL) task, establishing a precedent for both the scale and effectiveness of uncertainty quantification in vision models.

Practical Implications

The pretrained uncertainties have broad applicabilities, from enhancing data visualization to ensuring safer retrievals in machine learning pipelines:

  • Uncertainty-aware dataset visualization allows for a more nuanced exploration of data clusters, identifying potential outliers or ambiguous entries effectively.
  • Safe retrieval utilizes uncertainty estimates to refine image retrieval processes, significantly reducing mismatch rates and promoting more reliable model outcomes.

Future Directions

The groundwork laid by this research opens up new avenues for further exploration. The scalability of the pretraining dataset and the methodology's applicability beyond vision models and classification tasks present exciting opportunities for expansion. Moreover, the demonstrated improvements in training efficiency and the release of pretrained uncertainty checkpoints create a foundation for continued innovation in the domain of trustworthy AI.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a groundbreaking approach toward integrating pretrained uncertainty estimation with vision models, significantly advancing the reliability and applicability of machine learning systems. Through methodological innovations and extensive validation, it paves the way for future research in scalable, efficient, and generalizable uncertainty quantification across diverse AI applications.

Impact Consideration

The development of these pretrained uncertainties underscores a commitment to enhancing the safety and trustworthiness of AI systems. By allowing models to recognize and quantify their limitations, the research contributes to a more ethically sound and accountable deployment of machine learning technologies.

Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com