Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Comparison of Deep Learning Models for Proton Background Rejection with the AMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter (2402.16285v1)

Published 26 Feb 2024 in hep-ex and cs.LG

Abstract: The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) is a high-precision particle detector onboard the International Space Station containing six different subdetectors. The Transition Radiation Detector and Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) are used to separate electrons/positrons from the abundant cosmic-ray proton background. The positron flux measured in space by AMS falls with a power law which unexpectedly softens above 25 GeV and then hardens above 280 GeV. Several theoretical models try to explain these phenomena, and a purer measurement of positrons at higher energies is needed to help test them. The currently used methods to reject the proton background at high energies involve extrapolating shower features from the ECAL to use as inputs for boosted decision tree and likelihood classifiers. We present a new approach for particle identification with the AMS ECAL using deep learning (DL). By taking the energy deposition within all the ECAL cells as an input and treating them as pixels in an image-like format, we train an MLP, a CNN, and multiple ResNets and Convolutional vision Transformers (CvTs) as shower classifiers. Proton rejection performance is evaluated using Monte Carlo (MC) events and ISS data separately. For MC, using events with a reconstructed energy between 0.2 - 2 TeV, at 90% electron accuracy, the proton rejection power of our CvT model is more than 5 times that of the other DL models. Similarly, for ISS data with a reconstructed energy between 50 - 70 GeV, the proton rejection power of our CvT model is more than 2.5 times that of the other DL models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. Samuel Ting “The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station” In Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 243-244 North-Holland, 2013, pp. 12–24 DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2013.09.028
  2. “New monitoring interface for the AMS experiment” In Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 1046 North-Holland, 2023, pp. 167704 DOI: 10.1016/J.NIMA.2022.167704
  3. AMS Collaboration “AMS-02” In ams02.space, 2023 URL: https://ams02.space/
  4. “Towards Understanding the Origin of Cosmic-Ray Positrons” In Physical Review Letters 122.4 American Physical Society, 2019, pp. 041102 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.041102
  5. “The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) on the International Space Station: Part II — Results from the First Seven Years” In Physics Reports 894 North-Holland, 2021, pp. 1–116 DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.003
  6. “Constraints on Cosmic-Ray Propagation Models from a Global Bayesian Analysis” In The Astrophysical Journal 729.2, 2011, pp. 106 DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/2/106
  7. Joachim Kopp “Constraints on Dark Matter Annihilation from AMS-02 Results” In Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 88.7 American Physical Society, 2013, pp. 076013 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.076013
  8. Thomas Kirn “The AMS-02 TRD on the international space station” In Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 706 North-Holland, 2013, pp. 43–47 DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2012.05.010
  9. “The AMS-02 lead-scintillating fibres Electromagnetic Calorimeter” In Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 714 North-Holland, 2013, pp. 147–154 DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2013.02.020
  10. Matthew Scott Krafczyk “A Precision Measurement of the Cosmic Ray Positron Fraction on the International Space Station”, 2016
  11. “Precision measurement of 0.5 GeV–3 TeV electrons and positrons using the AMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter” In Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 869 Elsevier B.V., 2017, pp. 110–117 DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.07.013
  12. Robert E. Schapire “The Boosting Approach to Machine Learning: An Overview” Springer, New York, NY, 2003, pp. 149–171 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-21579-2–“˙˝9
  13. “Boosted decision trees as an alternative to artificial neural networks for particle identification” In Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 543.2-3 North-Holland, 2005, pp. 577–584 DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2004.12.018
  14. “Deep residual learning for image recognition” In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2016-December IEEE Computer Society, 2016, pp. 770–778 DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
  15. “CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformers” In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Institute of ElectricalElectronics Engineers Inc., 2021, pp. 22–31 DOI: 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00009
  16. Ashot Chilingarian “Neural classification technique for background rejection in high energy physics experiments” In Neurocomputing 6.5-6 Elsevier, 1994, pp. 497–512 DOI: 10.1016/0925-2312(94)90002-7
  17. “Jet flavor classification in high-energy physics with deep neural networks” In Physical Review D 94.11 American Physical Society, 2016, pp. 112002 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.112002
  18. “Demonstration of background rejection using deep convolutional neural networks in the NEXT experiment” In Journal of High Energy Physics 2021.1 Springer ScienceBusiness Media Deutschland GmbH, 2021, pp. 1–22 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2021)189
  19. AMS Collaboration “Charge Sign Identification Improvement in the Tracker Analysis” In ams02.space, 2019 URL: https://ams02.space/advances-data-analysis/charge-sign-identification-improvement-tracker-analysis
  20. “Unsupervised Learning of Invariant Feature Hierarchies with Applications to Object Recognition” In 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition IEEE, 2007, pp. 1–8 DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383157
  21. “Attention is All you Need” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, 2017
  22. Raheem Karim Hashmani “A Deep Learning Approach to Proton Background Rejection for Positron Analysis with the AMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter”, 2023 URL: https://github.com/RKHashmani/DeepLearning-for-AMS-ECAL

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com