All Thresholds Barred: Direct Estimation of Call Density in Bioacoustic Data (2402.15360v1)
Abstract: Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) studies generate thousands of hours of audio, which may be used to monitor specific animal populations, conduct broad biodiversity surveys, detect threats such as poachers, and more. Machine learning classifiers for species identification are increasingly being used to process the vast amount of audio generated by bioacoustic surveys, expediting analysis and increasing the utility of PAM as a management tool. In common practice, a threshold is applied to classifier output scores, and scores above the threshold are aggregated into a detection count. The choice of threshold produces biased counts of vocalizations, which are subject to false positive/negative rates that may vary across subsets of the dataset. In this work, we advocate for directly estimating call density: The proportion of detection windows containing the target vocalization, regardless of classifier score. Our approach targets a desirable ecological estimator and provides a more rigorous grounding for identifying the core problems caused by distribution shifts -- when the defining characteristics of the data distribution change -- and designing strategies to mitigate them. We propose a validation scheme for estimating call density in a body of data and obtain, through Bayesian reasoning, probability distributions of confidence scores for both the positive and negative classes. We use these distributions to predict site-level densities, which may be subject to distribution shifts. We test our proposed methods on a real-world study of Hawaiian birds and provide simulation results leveraging existing fully annotated datasets, demonstrating robustness to variations in call density and classifier model quality.
- “Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines” In Science 328.5982, 2010, pp. 1164–1168 DOI: 10.1126/science.1187512
- James D. Nichols and Byron K. Williams “Monitoring for conservation” In Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21.12, 2006, pp. 668–673 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.007
- “Terrestrial Passive Acoustic Monitoring: Review and Perspectives” In BioScience 69.1, 2019, pp. 15–25 DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biy147
- “Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation” In Nature Communications 13.11 Nature Publishing Group, 2022, pp. 792 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-27980-y
- “Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring” In Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10.2, 2018, pp. 169–185 DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13101
- “Recommendations for acoustic recognizer performance assessment with application to five common automated signal recognition programs” In Avian Conservation and Ecology 12, 2017 DOI: 10.5751/ACE-01114-120214
- “Automated bird sound classifications of long-duration recordings produce occupancy model outputs similar to manually annotated data” In Ornithological Applications 124.2, 2022, pp. duac003 DOI: 10.1093/ornithapp/duac003
- David A.W. Miller and Evan H.Campbell Grant “Estimating occupancy dynamics for large-scale monitoring networks: Amphibian breeding occupancy across protected areas in the northeast United States” In Ecology and Evolution 5.21, 2015, pp. 4735–4746 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1679
- “A new framework for analysing automated acoustic species detection data: Occupancy estimation and optimization of recordings post-processing” In Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9.3, 2018, pp. 560–570 DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12910
- Matthew J. Clement, J.Andrew Royle and Ronald J. Mixan “Estimating occupancy from autonomous recording unit data in the presence of misclassifications and detection heterogeneity” In Methods in Ecology and Evolution 13.8, 2022, pp. 1719–1729 DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13895
- “Breeding status shapes territoriality and vocalization patterns in spotted owls” In Journal of Avian Biology 2022.8, 2022, pp. e02952 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.02952
- “Measurement of Territory and Home Range Size in Birds” In The Auk 72.2, 1955, pp. 128–137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4081419
- Elly C. Knight and Erin M. Bayne “Classification threshold and training data affect the quality and utility of focal species data processed with automated audio-recognition software” In Bioacoustics 28.6 Taylor & Francis, 2018, pp. 539–554 DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2018.1503971
- “Birds, bats and beyond: Evaluating generalization in bioacoustics models” In arXiv preprint, 2024
- “An annotated set of audio recordings of Eastern North American birds containing” In Ecology 102.6, 2021, pp. e03329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3329
- “Global birdsong embeddings enable superior transfer learning for bioacoustic classification” In Scientific Reports 13.11 Nature Publishing Group, 2023, pp. 22876 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49989-z
- United States Fish and Wildlife Service “Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge: comprehensive conservation plan”, 2010
- “Forest Bird Populations at the Big Island National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Hawai‘i” In Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, 2023
- Carmen C. Antaky, Nicole K. Galase and Melissa R. Price “Nesting ecology in the Hawaiian population of an endangered seabird, the Band-rumped Storm-Petrel (Oceanodroma castro)” In The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 131.2, 2019, pp. 402–406 DOI: 10.1676/18-123
- Robert H Day, Brian A Cooper and Richard J Blaha “Movement patterns of Hawaiian Petrels and Newell’s Shearwaters on the island of Hawaiʻi” In Pacific Science 57.2 University of Hawai’i Press, 2003, pp. 147–159
- International Union for Conservation of Nature “The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species”, 2024 URL: https://www.iucnredlist.org/en
- “Forest Bird Communities of the Hawaiian Islands: Their Dynamics, Ecology, and Conservation” In Studies in Avian Biology, 1986
- “Linking vocal behaviours to habitat structure to create behavioural landscapes” In Animal Behaviour 201, 2023, pp. 1–11 DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2023.04.006
- “Managing the Effects of Introduced Predators on Hawaiian Endangered Seabirds” In The Journal of Wildlife Management 84.3, 2020, pp. 425–435 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21824
- “Characteristics Associated with Newell’s Shearwater (Puffinus newelli) and Hawaiian Petrel (Pterodroma sandwichensis) Burrows on Kauai, Hawaii, USA” In Waterbirds 39.2 The Waterbird Society, 2016, pp. 199–204 DOI: 10.1675/063.039.0211
- D.J. Spiegelhalter “Probabilistic prediction in patient management and clinical trials” In Statistics in Medicine 5.5, 1986, pp. 421–433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780050506
- “Assessing the performance of prediction models: A framework for traditional and novel measures” In Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) 21.1, 2010, pp. 128–138 DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2
- Johannes Resin “From Classification Accuracy to Proper Scoring Rules: Elicitability of Probabilistic Top List Predictions” In Journal of Machine Learning Research 24.173, 2023 DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.11797
- Richard E. Warner “The Role of Introduced Diseases in the Extinction of the Endemic Hawaiian Avifauna” In The Condor 70.2, 1968, pp. 101–120 DOI: 10.2307/1365954
- “Environmental Assessment for use of Wolbachia-based Incompatible Insect Technique for the suppression of nonnative southern house mosquito populations on Kauaʻi”, 2023