A modified debiased inverse-variance weighted estimator in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization (2402.15086v2)
Abstract: Mendelian randomization uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to make causal inferences about the effects of modifiable risk factors on diseases from observational data. One of the major challenges in Mendelian randomization is that many genetic variants are only modestly or even weakly associated with the risk factor of interest, a setting known as many weak instruments. Many existing methods, such as the popular inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, could be biased when the instrument strength is weak. To address this issue, the debiased IVW (dIVW) estimator, which is shown to be robust to many weak instruments, was recently proposed. However, this estimator still has non-ignorable bias when the effective sample size is small. In this paper, we propose a modified debiased IVW (mdIVW) estimator by multiplying a modification factor to the original dIVW estimator. After this simple correction, we show that the bias of the mdIVW estimator converges to zero at a faster rate than that of the dIVW estimator under some regularity conditions. Moreover, the mdIVW estimator has smaller variance than the dIVW estimator.We further extend the proposed method to account for the presence of instrumental variable selection and balanced horizontal pleiotropy. We demonstrate the improvement of the mdIVW estimator over the dIVW estimator through extensive simulation studies and real data analysis.
- doi: 10.1214/19-AOS1866
- doi: 10.1093/ije/dym018
- doi: 10.1177/0962280215597579
- Didelez V, Sheehan N. Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 2007;16(4):309-330. doi: 10.1177/09622802060Didel77743
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6358
- Chao JC, Swanson NR. Consistent Estimation with a Large Number of Weak Instruments. Econometrica. 2005;73(5):1673-1692. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00632.x
- John Bound DAJ, Baker RM. Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation when the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1995;90(430):443-450. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476536
- doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy163
- doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0164-2
- doi: 10.1214/20-STS802
- Pacini D, Windmeijer F. Robust inference for the Two-Sample 2SLS estimator. Economics Letters. 2016;146:50-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.06.033
- doi: 10.1111/rssb.12275
- Hyunseung Kang TTC, Small DS. Instrumental Variables Estimation With Some Invalid Instruments and its Application to Mendelian Randomization. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2016;111(513):132-144. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.994705
- doi: 10.1038/s43586-021-00092-5
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21758
- Pierce BL, Burgess S. Efficient Design for Mendelian Randomization Studies: Subsample and 2-Sample Instrumental Variable Estimators. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2013;178(7):1177-1184. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt084
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7221
- doi: 10.1214/20-AOS2027
- doi: 10.1214/22-AOS2247
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13732
- doi: 10.1086/519795
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21965
- doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080
- Ziaeian B, Fonarow GC. Epidemiology and aetiology of heart failure. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2016;13(6):368-78. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.25
- doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
- doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02317-2
- doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13690-5