AI-Augmented Brainwriting: Investigating the use of LLMs in group ideation (2402.14978v2)
Abstract: The growing availability of generative AI technologies such as LLMs has significant implications for creative work. This paper explores twofold aspects of integrating LLMs into the creative process - the divergence stage of idea generation, and the convergence stage of evaluation and selection of ideas. We devised a collaborative group-AI Brainwriting ideation framework, which incorporated an LLM as an enhancement into the group ideation process, and evaluated the idea generation process and the resulted solution space. To assess the potential of using LLMs in the idea evaluation process, we design an evaluation engine and compared it to idea ratings assigned by three expert and six novice evaluators. Our findings suggest that integrating LLM in Brainwriting could enhance both the ideation process and its outcome. We also provide evidence that LLMs can support idea evaluation. We conclude by discussing implications for HCI education and practice.
- I Elaine Allen and Christopher A Seaman. 2007. Likert scales and data analyses. Quality progress 40, 7 (2007), 64–65.
- Digital Crafts-Machine-Ship: Creative Collaborations with Machines. Interactions 27, 1 (dec 2019), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373644
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
- CompVis Group and Runway and Stability AI. 2022. Stable Diffusion Online. https://stablediffusionweb.com/. Accessed: 02-08-2023.
- Conceptboard. 2023a. Brainwriting Technique Free Template. https://conceptboard.com/blog/brainwriting-technique-free-template/. Accessed: 12-09-2023.
- Conceptboard. 2023b. Secure Collaboration Tool for Hybrid Teams - Conceptboard. https://conceptboard.com/. Accessed: 14-09-2023.
- Linking the divergent and convergent processes of collaborative creativity: The impact of expertise levels and elaboration processes. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019), 699.
- Fit-for-Purpose Creativity Assessment: Using Machine Learning to Score a Figural Creativity Test. PsyArXiv Preprints N/A, N/A (2023), N/A. Available online at PsyArXiv.
- Edward De Bono. 1999. Six Thinking Hats. Back Bay Books, New York.
- Identifying Quality, Novel, and Creative Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 7 (2006), 30. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15910404
- Teams in Organizations. Small Group Research 30, 6 (dec 1999), 678–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649649903000602
- Michael Diehl and Wolfgang Stroebe. 1987. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of personality and social psychology 53, 3 (1987), 497.
- Anil R Doshi and Oliver Hauser. 2023. Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity. Available at SSRN N/A, N/A (2023), N/A.
- UX Design Innovation: Challenges for Working with Machine Learning as a Design Material. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025739
- Prototyping Dynamics: Sharing Multiple Designs Improves Exploration, Group Rapport, and Results. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2807–2816. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979359
- Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2, 4 (2008), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.59 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sej.59
- Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22, 2 (1998), 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80038-X
- Rahel Flechtner and Aeneas Stankowski. 2023. AI Is Not a Wildcard: Challenges for Integrating AI into the Design Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on HCI Education (Hamburg, Germany) (EduCHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3587399.3587410
- Elisa Giaccardi and Johan Redström. 2020. Technology and More-Than-Human Design. Design Issues 36, 4 (09 2020), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00612 arXiv:https://direct.mit.edu/desi/article- pdf/36/4/33/1857682/desi_a_00612.pdf
- PARAMETRIC HABITAT: Virtual Catalog of Design Prototypes. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1121–1133. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196813
- Ideas are dimes a dozen: large language models for idea generation in innovation (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4526071).
- Preparing Future Designers for Human-AI Collaboration in Persona Creation. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1–14.
- Google. 2023. Bard: Chat-Based AI Tool from Google, Powered by PaLM 2. https://bard.google.com/. Accessed: 14-09-2023.
- RECIPE: How to Integrate ChatGPT into EFL Writing Education. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258823196
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) from a user perspective: A synthesis of prior literature and problematizing avenues for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 186 (2023), 122120.
- Andrew Hargadon. 2003. How breakthroughs happen: The surprising truth about how companies innovate. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.
- Harvard Business Review. 2022. How Generative AI Is Changing Creative Work. https://hbr.org/2022/11/how-generative-ai-is-changing-creative-work. Accessed: 01-08-2023.
- Getting Inspired! Understanding How and Why Examples Are Used in Creative Design Practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518717
- Peter A. Heslin. 2009. Better than brainstorming? Potential contextual boundary conditions to brainwriting for idea generation in organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 82, 1 (2009), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X285642 arXiv:https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1348/096317908X285642
- Tracing Conceptions of the Body in HCI: From User to More-Than-Human. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 258, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445656
- Charles McLaughlin Hymes and Gary M Olson. 1992. Unblocking brainstorming through the use of a simple group editor. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 99–106.
- Designing Participatory AI: Creative Professionals’ Worries and Expectations about Generative AI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 82, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585657
- History and future of human-automation interaction. International journal of human-computer studies 131 (2019), 99–107.
- Frans Johansson. 2004. The medici effect. Penerbit Serambi, Jakarta, Indonesia.
- Martin Jonsson and Jakob Tholander. 2022. Cracking the Code: Co-Coding with AI in Creative Programming Education. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Venice, Italy) (C&C ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527927.3532801
- Noise: a flaw in human judgment. Hachette UK, London, UK.
- Jingoog Kim and Mary Lou Maher. 2023. The effect of AI-based inspiration on human design ideation. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 11, 2 (2023), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2023.2167124 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2023.2167124
- Unreflected Acceptance–Investigating the Negative Consequences of ChatGPT-Assisted Problem Solving in Physics Education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.03087 N/A, N/A (2023), N/A.
- Solomon Kullback and Richard A Leibler. 1951. On information and sufficiency. The annals of mathematical statistics 22, 1 (1951), 79–86.
- Impact of guidance and interaction strategies for LLM use on Learner Performance and perception. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13712
- Designing with Interactive Example Galleries. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2257–2266. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753667
- John D Lee and Katrina A See. 2004. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human factors 46, 1 (2004), 50–80.
- J McCormack and A Dorin. 2014. Generative Design: A Paradigm for Design Research. Futureground - DRS International Conference N/A, N/A (2014), 17–21.
- Meta Research. 2023. LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models. https://research.facebook.com/publications/llama-open-and-efficient-foundation-language-models/. Accessed: 14-09-2023.
- Midjourney. 2022. Midjourney. https://www.midjourney.com/. [Accessed 01-08-2023].
- Miro. 2023a. First Idea to Final Innovation: It All Lives Here. https://miro.com/product-overview/. Accessed: 14-09-2023.
- Miro. 2023b. Miro AI. https://miro.com/ai/. Accessed: 09-09-2023.
- Osnat Mokryn and Hagit Ben-Shoshan. 2021. Domain-based Latent Personal Analysis and its use for impersonation detection in social media. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interactions 31, 4 (2021), 785–828.
- René Morkos. 2023. Council Post: Generative AI: It’s Not All ChatGPT — forbes.com. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2023/04/24/generative-ai-its-not-all-chatgpt/?sh=151ea40a32ef. [Accessed 01-08-2023].
- MURAL. 2023. Work Better Together with Mural’s Visual Work Platform. https://www.mural.co/. Accessed: 14-09-2023.
- Thomas Olsson and Kaisa Väänänen. 2021. How Does AI Challenge Design Practice? Interactions 28, 4 (jun 2021), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3467479
- OpenAI. 2022. DALL·E 2. https://openai.com/dall-e-2. Accessed: 2-08-2023.
- OpenAI. 2023. GPT-4 — openai.com. https://openai.com/gpt-4. Accessed: 14-09-2023.
- Alex F Osborn. 1953. Applied imagination. Charles Scribner’s Son’s, New York, USA.
- Choicemates: Supporting unfamiliar online decision-making with multi-agent conversational interactions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.01331
- Paul B Paulus and Mary T Dzindolet. 1993. Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of personality and social psychology 64, 4 (1993), 575.
- Paul B Paulus and Huei-Chuan Yang. 2000. Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 82, 1 (2000), 76–87.
- Billy Perrigo. 2023. Exclusive: OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less Than $2 Per Hour to Make ChatGPT Less Toxic. https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/
- Anuradha Reddy. 2022. Artificial everyday creativity: creative leaps with AI through critical making. Digital Creativity 33, 4 (2022), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2022.2138452
- Kevin Roose. 2022. The Brilliance and Weirdness of ChatGPT. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html
- root. 2022. noda - mind mapping in virtual reality, solo or group — noda.io. https://noda.io/. [Accessed 09-09-2023].
- Interacting with Large Language Models: A Case Study on AI-Aided Brainstorming for Guesstimation Problems. In HHAI 2023: Augmenting Human Intellect. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 153–167.
- Simulating the Human in HCD with ChatGPT: Redesigning Interaction Design with AI. Interactions 31, 1 (jan 2024), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637436
- Orit Shaer and Angelora Cooper. 2023. Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence to a Project Based Tangible Interaction Course. IEEE Pervasive Computing 23, 1 (2023), 5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2023.3346548
- Integrating AI in Human-Human Collaborative Ideation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 355, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3573802
- Toward Collaborative Ideation at Scale: Leveraging Ideas from Others to Generate More Creative and Diverse Ideas. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 937–945. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675239
- Dominik Siemon. 2023. Let the computer evaluate your idea: evaluation apprehension in human-computer collaboration. Behaviour & Information Technology 42, 5 (2023), 459–477.
- Chapter Four - Beyond Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: The Evolution of a Question. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Mark P. Zanna and James M. Olson (Eds.). Vol. 43. Academic Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 157–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43004-X
- Towards A Process Model for Co-Creating AI Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1529–1543. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462012
- Ivan E. Sutherland. 1963. Sketchpad: A Man-Machine Graphical Communication System. In Proceedings of the May 21-23, 1963, Spring Joint Computer Conference (Detroit, Michigan) (AFIPS ’63 (Spring)). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1145/1461551.1461591
- Ivan Edward Sutherland. 2003. Sketchpad: A man-machine graphical communication system. Technical Report UCAM-CL-TR-574. University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.48456/tr-574
- The New York Times. 2023. What’s the Future for A.I.? — nytimes.com. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/31/technology/ai-chatbots-benefits-dangers.html. Accessed: 01-08-2023.
- Jakob Tholander and Martin Jonsson. 2023. Design Ideation with AI - Sketching, Thinking and Talking with Generative Machine Learning Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (DIS ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1930–1940. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596014
- Barbara Tversky and Juliet Y. Chou. 2011. Creativity: Depth and Breadth. In Design Creativity 2010, Toshiharu Taura and Yukari Nagai (Eds.). Springer London, London, 209–214.
- Weaving Fire into Form: Aspirations for Tangible and Embodied Interaction (1 ed.). Vol. 44. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
- Expectation vs. experience: Evaluating the usability of code generation tools powered by large language models. In Chi conference on human factors in computing systems extended abstracts. ACM, NY, USA, 1–7.
- Jelle van Dijk. 2020. Post-Human Interaction Design, Yes, but Cautiously. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS’ 20 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395886
- Mathias Peter Verheijden and Mathias Funk. 2023. Collaborative Diffusion: Boosting Designerly Co-Creation with Generative AI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 73, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585680
- Ron Wakkary. 2020. Nomadic Practices: A Posthuman Theory for Knowing Design. International Journal of Design 14, 3 (2020), 117.
- Ron Wakkary. 2021. Things we could design: For more than human-centered worlds. MIT Press, Boston, MA, USA.
- Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI Challenges. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 249, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581278
- PopBlends: Strategies for Conceptual Blending with Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 435, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580948
- Chauncey Wilson. 2013. Using Brainwriting For Rapid Idea Generation. https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2013/12/using-brainwriting-for-rapid-idea-generation/
- Re-Examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376301
- Orit Shaer (4 papers)
- Angelora Cooper (2 papers)
- Osnat Mokryn (12 papers)
- Andrew L. Kun (3 papers)
- Hagit Ben Shoshan (2 papers)