Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Weakly supervised localisation of prostate cancer using reinforcement learning for bi-parametric MR images (2402.13778v1)

Published 21 Feb 2024 in cs.CV

Abstract: In this paper we propose a reinforcement learning based weakly supervised system for localisation. We train a controller function to localise regions of interest within an image by introducing a novel reward definition that utilises non-binarised classification probability, generated by a pre-trained binary classifier which classifies object presence in images or image crops. The object-presence classifier may then inform the controller of its localisation quality by quantifying the likelihood of the image containing an object. Such an approach allows us to minimize any potential labelling or human bias propagated via human labelling for fully supervised localisation. We evaluate our proposed approach for a task of cancerous lesion localisation on a large dataset of real clinical bi-parametric MR images of the prostate. Comparisons to the commonly used multiple-instance learning weakly supervised localisation and to a fully supervised baseline show that our proposed method outperforms the multi-instance learning and performs comparably to fully-supervised learning, using only image-level classification labels for training.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. “Prostate cancer detection using deep convolutional neural networks,” Scientific reports, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 19518, 2019.
  2. “A new era: artificial intelligence and machine learning in prostate cancer,” Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 391–403, 2019.
  3. “Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric mri and trus biopsy in prostate cancer (promis): a paired validating confirmatory study,” 2017.
  4. “Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric mri in biopsynaive patients (mri-first): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study,” 2019.
  5. “Variability in accuracy of prostate cancer segmentation among radiologists, urologists, and scientists,” Cancer Medicine, vol. 9, no. 19, pp. 7172–7182, 2020.
  6. “Image quality assessment by overlapping task-specific and task-agnostic measures: application to prostate multiparametric mr images for cancer segmentation,” 2022.
  7. “The impact of using voxel-level segmentation metrics on evaluating multifocal prostate cancer localisation,” 2022.
  8. “Deeply supervised 3d fully convolutional networks with group dilated convolution for automatic mri prostate segmentation,” Medical physics, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1707—1718, April 2019.
  9. “Combining weakly and strongly supervised learning improves strong supervision in gleason pattern classification,” BMC Medical Imaging, vol. 21, 05 2021.
  10. “Joint weakly and semi-supervised deep learning for localization and classification of masses in breast ultrasound images,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 762–774, 2019.
  11. “An interpretable classifier for high-resolution breast cancer screening images utilizing weakly supervised localization,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 68, pp. 101908, 2021.
  12. “Weakly supervised large scale object localization with multiple instance learning and bag splitting,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 405–416, 2016.
  13. “Is segmentation uncertainty useful?,” in Information Processing in Medical Imaging Conference, IPMI 2021. Springer, 2021, pp. 715–726.
  14. “Lung nodule detection via deep reinforcement learning,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 8, pp. 108, 04 2018.
  15. “Learning to detect chest radiographs containing pulmonary lesions using visual attention networks,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 53, pp. 26–38, 2019.
  16. “Adaptable image quality assessment using meta-reinforcement learning of task amenability,” 2021.
  17. “Data valuation using reinforcement learning,” 2019.
  18. “Proximal policy optimization algorithms,” 2017.
  19. “The smarttarget biopsy trial: a prospective, within person randomised, blinded trial comparing the accuracy of visual-registration and magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound image-fusion targeted biopsies for prostate cancer risk stratification.,” European urology, 2019.
  20. “Accuracy of transperineal targeted prostate biopsies, visual estimation and image fusion in men needing repeat biopsy in the picture trial.,” The Journal of urology, 2018.
  21. “Prostate radiofrequency focal ablation (proraft) trial: A prospective development study evaluating a bipolar radiofrequency device to treat prostate cancer.,” The Journal of Urology, 2021.
  22. A. Kirkham L. Dickinson, H. U. Ahmed and et al., “A multi-centre prospective development study evaluating focal therapy using high intensity focused ultrasound for localised prostate cancer: the index study.,” Contemporary clinical trials, 2013.
  23. “Promis—prostate mr imaging study: a paired validating cohort study evaluating the role of multi-parametric mri in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer.,” Contemporary clinical trials, 2015.
  24. “Intratumoural evolutionary landscape of high-risk prostate cancer: the progeny study of genomic and immune parameters.,” Annals of Oncology, 2017.
  25. “Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2278–2324, 1998.
  26. “Breast cancer histopathology image classification and localization using multiple instance learning,” 11 2019, pp. 1–4.
  27. Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support, Springer International Publishing, 2018.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.