Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Monolithic Cybersecurity Architecture for Power Electronic Systems (2402.13617v2)

Published 21 Feb 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: Power electronic systems (PES) face significant threats from various data availability and integrity attacks, significantly affecting the performance of communication networks and power system operation. As a result, several attack detection and reconstruction techniques are deployed, which makes it a costly & complex cybersecurity operational platform with significant room for incremental extensions for mitigation against future threats. Unlike the said traditional arrangements, our paper introduces a foundational approach by establishing a monolithic cybersecurity architecture (MCA) via incorporating semantic principles into the sampling process for distributed energy resources (DERs). This unified approach concurrently compensates for the intrusion challenges posed by cyber attacks by reconstructing signals using the dynamics of the inner control layer. This reconstruction considers essential semantic attributes, like Priority, Freshness, and Relevance to ensure resilient dynamic performance. Hence, the proposed scheme promises a generalized route to concurrently tackle a global set of cyber attacks in elevating the resilience of PES. Finally, rigorous validation on a modified IEEE 69-bus distribution system and a real-world South California Edison (SCE) 47-bus network, using OPAL-RT under diverse operating conditions, underscores its robustness, model-free design capability, scalability, and adaptability to dynamic cyber graphs and system reconfiguration.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. A. Singhal, T. L. Vu and W. Du, “Consensus Control for Coordinating Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Inverters in Microgrids,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 4123-4133, Sept. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2022.3158254.
  2. S. Patel, S. Chakraborty, B. Lundstrom, S. M. Salapaka and M. V. Salapaka, “Isochronous Architecture-Based Voltage-Active Power Droop for Multi-Inverter Systems,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1088-1103, March 2021, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2020.3037159.
  3. D. C. Mazur, R. D. Quint and V. A. Centeno, “Time Synchronization of Automation Controllers for Power Applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 25-32, Jan.-Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2013.2267710.
  4. Y. Han, K. Zhang, H. Li, E. A. A. Coelho and J. M. Guerrero, “MAS-Based Distributed Coordinated Control and Optimization in Microgrid and Microgrid Clusters: A Comprehensive Overview,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 6488-6508, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2761438.
  5. K. Gupta, S. Sahoo, R. Mohanty, B. Ketan Panigrahi and F. Blaabjerg, “Distinguishing Between Cyber Attacks and Faults in Power Electronic Systems—A Noninvasive Approach,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1578-1588, April 2023, doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2022.3221867.
  6. R. Kateb, P. Akaber, M. H. K. Tushar, A. Albarakati, M. Debbabi and C. Assi, “Enhancing WAMS Communication Network Against Delay Attacks,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2738-2751, May 2019, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2018.2809958.
  7. K. Gupta, S. Sahoo, B. K. Panigrahi and C. Konstantinou, “Impact Assessment of Data Integrity Attacks in MVDC Shipboard Power Systems,” IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium (ESTS), Alexandria, VA, USA, 2023, pp. 512-519, doi: 10.1109/ESTS56571.2023.10220547.
  8. L. Sheng, G. Lou, W. Gu, S. Lu, S. Ding and Z. Ye, “Optimal Communication Network Design of Microgrids Considering Cyber-Attacks and Time-Delays,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 3774-3785, Sept. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2022.3169343.
  9. M. Kumar, “Resilient PIDA Control Design Based Frequency Regulation of Interconnected Time-Delayed Microgrid Under Cyber-Attacks,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 492-502, Jan.-Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2022.3205280.
  10. T. Yang, Y. He and G. -P. Liu, “Distributed Voltage Restoration of AC Microgrids Under Communication Delays: A Predictive Control Perspective,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 2614-2624, June 2022, doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2022.3163204.
  11. A. Mohammad Saber, A. Youssef, D. Svetinovic, H. H. Zeineldin and E. F. El-Saadany, “Anomaly-Based Detection of Cyberattacks on Line Current Differential Relays,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 4787-4800, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2022.3185764.
  12. M. Alizadeh, H. A. Abyaneh and K. Rouzbehi, “An Enhanced Distributed Event-Triggered Mechanism of Cyber-Switched Communications for Control of Islanded AC Microgrids,” IEEE Sys. J., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1501-1511, March 2023, doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2022.3206026.
  13. H. Yang, C. Deng, X. Xie and L. Ding, “Distributed Resilient Secondary Control for AC Microgrid Under FDI Attacks,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II-Express Briefs, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 2570-2574, July 2023, doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2023.3245282.
  14. H. Xie, Z. Qin, G. Y. Li and B. -H. Juang, “Deep Learning Enabled Semantic Communication Systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 69, pp. 2663-2675, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TSP.2021.3071210.
  15. M. Kountouris and N. Pappas, “Semantics-Empowered Communication for Networked Intelligent Systems,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 96-102, June 2021, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.2000604.
  16. T. Han, Q. Yang, Z. Shi, S. He and Z. Zhang, “Semantic-Preserved Communication System for Highly Efficient Speech Transmission,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 245-259, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2022.3221952.
  17. P. Popovski, O. Simeone, F. Boccardi, D. Gunduz, and O. Sahin, “Semantic-effectiveness filtering and control for post-5G wireless connectivity,” J. Indian Inst. Sci., vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 435–443, Apr. 2020.
  18. X. Luo, H. -H. Chen and Q. Guo, “Semantic Communications: Overview, Open Issues, and Future Research Directions,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 210-219, February 2022, doi: 10.1109/MWC.101.2100269.
  19. A. Ali, K. Mahmoud and M. Lehtonen, “Multiobjective Photovoltaic Sizing With Diverse Inverter Control Schemes in Distribution Systems Hosting EVs,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 5982-5992, Sept. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TII.2020.3039246.
  20. V. Kekatos, G. Wang, A. J. Conejo and G. B. Giannakis, “Stochastic Reactive Power Management in Microgrids With Renewables,” IEEE Trans. Power Sys., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 3386-3395, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2369452.
  21. The South California Edison’s Distributed Energy Resource Interconnection Map (DERiM). [Online]: https://drpep.sce.com/drpep/.
  22. K. Gupta, S. Sahoo, B. K. Panigrahi, F. Blaabjerg and P. Popovski, “On the assessment of cyber risks and attack surfaces in a real-time co-simulation cybersecurity testbed for inverter-based microgrids”, Energies, vol. 14, no. 16, pp. 4941, Aug. 2021.
  23. M. Elsayed, M. Erol-Kantarci, B. Kantarci, L. Wu and J. Li, “Low-Latency Communications for Community Resilience Microgrids: A Reinforcement Learning Approach,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1091-1099, March 2020, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2019.2931753.
  24. X. Jiang, J. Zhang, B. J. Harding, J. J. Makela and A. D. Domı´nguez-Garcı´a, “Spoofing GPS Receiver Clock Offset of Phasor Measurement Units,” IEEE Trans. Power Sys., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 3253-3262, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2240706.
  25. E. Shereen, R. Ramakrishna and G. Dán, “Detection and Localization of PMU Time Synchronization Attacks via Graph Signal Processing,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 3241-3254, July 2022, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2022.3150954.
  26. S. Sahoo, Y. Yang and F. Blaabjerg, “Resilient Synchronization Strategy for AC Microgrids Under Cyber Attacks,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 73-77, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3005208.
  27. K. Gupta, S. Sahoo and B. K. Panigrahi, “Delay-Aware Semantic Sampling in Power Electronic Systems,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2023.3339707 (Early access).
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Kirti Gupta (4 papers)
  2. Subham Sahoo (26 papers)
  3. Bijaya Ketan Panigrahi (4 papers)
Citations (8)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now