Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Bound on the Maximal Marginal Degrees of Freedom (2402.12885v1)

Published 20 Feb 2024 in stat.ML and cs.LG

Abstract: Common kernel ridge regression is expensive in memory allocation and computation time. This paper addresses low rank approximations and surrogates for kernel ridge regression, which bridge these difficulties. The fundamental contribution of the paper is a lower bound on the rank of the low dimensional approximation, which is required such that the prediction power remains reliable. The bound relates the effective dimension with the largest statistical leverage score. We characterize the effective dimension and its growth behavior with respect to the regularization parameter by involving the regularity of the kernel. This growth is demonstrated to be asymptotically logarithmic for suitably chosen kernels, justifying low-rank approximations as the Nystr\"om method.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. F. Bach. Sharp analysis of low-rank kernel matrix approximations. In S. Shalev-Shwartz and I. Steinwart, editors, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, volume 30 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 185–209, Princeton, NJ, USA, 12–14 Jun 2013. PMLR. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v30/Bach13.html.
  2. M. Belkin. Approximation beats concentration? An approximation view on inference with smooth radial kernels. In S. Bubeck, V. Perchet, and P. Rigollet, editors, Proceedings of the 31st Conference On Learning Theory, volume 75 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1348–1361. PMLR, 06–09 Jul 2018. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v75/belkin18a.html.
  3. C. M. Bishop. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006. ISBN 0387310738.
  4. A. Caponnetto and E. De Vito. Optimal rates for the regularized least-squares algorithm. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 7(3):331–368, Aug. 2006. ISSN 1615-3383. doi:10.1007/s10208-006-0196-8.
  5. F. Cucker and D. X. Zhou. Learning Theory: An Approximation Theory Viewpoint. Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2007. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511618796.
  6. P. Dommel and A. Pichler. Stochastic optimization with estimated objectives. Pure and Applied Functional Analysis, 2021.
  7. P. Dommel and A. Pichler. Dynamic programming for data independent decision sets. Journal of Convex Analysis, 2023.
  8. M. Eberts and I. Steinwart. Optimal learning rates for least squares SVMs using Gaussian kernels. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 24, pages 1539–1547, 2011. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2011/file/51ef186e18dc00c2d31982567235c559-Paper.pdf.
  9. S. Fine and K. Scheinberg. Efficient SVM training using low-rank kernel representations. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2:243–264, 2002.
  10. S. Fischer and I. Steinwart. Sobolev norm learning rates for regularized least-squares algorithms. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 21(1), jan 2020. ISSN 1532-4435.
  11. Statistical robustness of empirical risks in machine learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(125):1–38, 2023. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v24/20-1039.html.
  12. M. Honarkhah and J. Caers. Stochastic simulation of patterns using distance-based pattern modeling. Mathematical Geosciences, 42(5):487–517, Apr. 2010. ISSN 1874-8953. doi:10.1007/s11004-010-9276-7.
  13. H. König and S. Richter. Eigenvalues of integral operators defined by analytic kernels. Mathematische Nachrichten, 119(1):141–155, 1984. ISSN 1522-2616. doi:10.1002/mana.19841190113.
  14. S. Mendelson and J. Neeman. Regularization in kernel learning. The Annals of Statistics, 38(1), Feb. 2010. ISSN 0090-5364. doi:10.1214/09-aos728.
  15. Data-driven stochastic dual dynamic programming: Performance guarantees and regularization schemes. 2022. URL https://optimization-online.org/?p=21376.
  16. A. Rahimi and B. Recht. Random features for large-scale kernel machines. In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2007. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:877929.
  17. Early stopping for non-parametric regression: An optimal data-dependent stopping rule. 49th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2011, 09 2011. doi:10.1109/Allerton.2011.6120320.
  18. Less is more: Nyström computational regularization. In C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 28. Curran Associates, Inc., 2015. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2015/file/03e0704b5690a2dee1861dc3ad3316c9-Paper.pdf.
  19. Falkon: An optimal large scale kernel method. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:25900554.
  20. B. Schölkopf. Support Vector Learning. 1997. URL https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_1794215/component/file_3214422/content.
  21. Kernel Methods in Computational Biology. The MIT Press, July 2004. ISBN 9780262256926. doi:10.7551/mitpress/4057.001.0001.
  22. I. Steinwart and A. Christmann. Support Vector Machines. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 1st edition, 2008. ISBN 0387772413.
  23. Optimal rates for regularized least squares regression. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Learning Theory, pages 79–93, 2009.
  24. R. Vershynin. High-Dimensional Probability: An Introduction with Applications in Data Science. Number 47 in Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018. ISBN 978-1-108-41519-4.
  25. H. Wendland. Scattered Data Approximation. Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2004. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617539.
  26. C. Williams and M. Seeger. Using the nyström method to speed up kernel machines. In T. Leen, T. Dietterich, and V. Tresp, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 13. MIT Press, 2000. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2000/file/19de10adbaa1b2ee13f77f679fa1483a-Paper.pdf.
  27. Randomized sketches for kernels: Fast and optimal nonparametric regression. The Annals of Statistics, 45(3):991–1023, 2017. ISSN 00905364. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/26362822.
  28. On early stopping in gradient descent learning. Constructive Approximation, 26:289–315, 08 2007. doi:10.1007/s00365-006-0663-2.
  29. Local features and kernels for classification of texture and object categories: A comprehensive study. International Journal of Computer Vision, 73(2):213–238, June 2007. ISSN 0920-5691. doi:10.1007/s11263-006-9794-4.
  30. Divide and conquer kernel ridge regression. In S. Shalev-Shwartz and I. Steinwart, editors, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, volume 30 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 592–617, Princeton, NJ, USA, 12–14 Jun 2013. PMLR. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v30/Zhang13.html.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (1)
  1. Paul Dommel (5 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper establishes a novel bound linking maximal marginal degrees of freedom with the effective dimension in kernel methods.
  • It employs rigorous analysis to connect randomness in sampling with deterministic kernel regularity, guiding the optimal choice of approximation rank.
  • The work informs a principled selection of centers in the Nyström method, enhancing computational efficiency in large-scale machine learning.

A New Insight into Nyström Method: Relating Maximal Marginal Degrees of Freedom and Effective Dimension

Kernel methods, given their sophisticated ability to capture non-linear patterns, have become indispensable in the field of machine learning. However, their widespread application is often hindered by substantial computational requirements, notably when dealing with large datasets. In this context, the Nyström method emerges as a salient low rank approximation technique designed to mitigate these computational challenges. Yet, a central question remains: What determines the necessary rank of the approximation for preserving the method's predictive power? This paper provides profound insights into this question by establishing a novel connection between the maximal marginal degrees of freedom and the effective dimension.

The maximal marginal degrees of freedom—an inherent characteristic of kernel methods—reflect the complexity of learning tasks. Until now, accurately gauging this parameter has been an arduous task due to its dependency on random samples. Conversely, the effective dimension offers a deterministic measure that is predominantly influenced by the kernel's regularity. Through rigorous theoretical analysis, this paper unveils that the effective dimension can serve as a reliable proxy for the maximal marginal degrees of freedom.

Heralding Efficiency in Kernel Approximation

At the heart of the Nyström method lies the goal of efficiently approximating the kernel matrix, which encapsulates the essence of data relationships. The method strategically selects a subset of the data (referred to as centers) to form a low-rank approximation of the kernel matrix, significantly reducing the computational load. However, discerning the optimal number of centers—closely tied to the approximation's rank—has remained a challenge, underscoring the need for understanding the maximal marginal degrees of freedom.

Bridging Deterministic and Random Measures

The paper's pivotal contribution is the demonstration that the effective dimension can effectively bound the maximal marginal degrees of freedom. Specifically, the authors develop a bound on the degrees of freedom that grows logarithmically with respect to the regularization parameter, λ, for kernels with exponentially decaying eigenvalues. This finding is pivotal as it suggests that the effective dimension adequately captures the complexity of the approximation problem, thereby guiding the selection of the number of centers in the Nyström method.

Implications and Future Directions

The revealed relationship between the maximal marginal degrees of freedom and the effective dimension opens new avenues for optimizing kernel approximations. It informs a more principled approach to determining the rank of the approximation, ensuring the Nyström method's efficacy is preserved while maximizing computational efficiency. Moreover, this insight enriches our understanding of kernel methods at large, highlighting the interplay between randomness inherent in data samples and deterministic kernel properties.

The ramifications of this discovery extend beyond theoretical interests, promising enhancements in machine learning applications that leverage kernel methods—from computer vision and speech recognition to bioinformatics. As future work, exploring this relationship across diverse kernels and learning settings will further solidify the foundations of efficient kernel approximations, potentially ushering in a new era of scalability in kernel methods.

In conclusion, this paper presents a groundbreaking perspective on the Nyström method by elucidating the connection between the maximal marginal degrees of freedom and the effective dimension. This advancement not only addresses a longstanding challenge in kernel approximations but also sets the stage for future explorations aimed at fine-tuning the balance between accuracy and computational efficiency in kernel-based learning algorithms.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com