Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPT-4o
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
o3 Pro
GPT-4.1 Pro
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
2000 character limit reached

Theoretical Approximation Ratios for Warm-Started QAOA on 3-Regular Max-Cut Instances at Depth $p=1$ (2402.12631v2)

Published 20 Feb 2024 in quant-ph, cs.DS, cs.ET, math.CO, and math.OC

Abstract: We generalize Farhi et al.'s 0.6924-approximation result technique of the Max-Cut Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) on 3-regular graphs to obtain provable lower bounds on the approximation ratio for warm-started QAOA. Given an initialization angle $\theta$, we consider warm-starts where the initial state is a product state where each qubit position is angle $\theta$ away from either the north or south pole of the Bloch sphere; of the two possible qubit positions the position of each qubit is decided by some classically obtained cut encoded as a bitstring $b$. We illustrate through plots how the properties of $b$ and the initialization angle $\theta$ influence the bound on the approximation ratios of warm-started QAOA. We consider various classical algorithms (and the cuts they produce which we use to generate the warm-start). Our results strongly suggest that there does not exist any choice of initialization angle that yields a (worst-case) approximation ratio that simultaneously beats standard QAOA and the classical algorithm used to create the warm-start. Additionally, we show that at $\theta=60\circ$, warm-started QAOA is able to (effectively) recover the cut used to generate the warm-start, thus suggesting that in practice, this value could be a promising starting angle to explore alternate solutions in a heuristic fashion.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (47)
  1. Lower bounds on number of qaoa rounds required for guaranteed approximation ratios. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15442, 2023.
  2. Grover mixers for qaoa: Shifting complexity from mixer design to state preparation. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), pages 72–82. IEEE, 2020.
  3. Obstacles to variational quantum optimization from symmetry protection. Physical Review Letters, 125:260505, Dec 2020.
  4. Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms for approximate graph coloring. Quantum, 6:678, 2022.
  5. Elementary proof of qaoa convergence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04968, 2023.
  6. Largest bipartite subgraphs in triangle-free graphs with maximum degree three. Journal of graph theory, 10(4):477–504, 1986.
  7. Rowland Leonard Brooks. On colouring the nodes of a network. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, volume 37, pages 194–197. Cambridge University Press, 1941.
  8. A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper. Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3-4):181–186, 1962.
  9. The qaoa gets stuck starting from a good classical string. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05089, 2022.
  10. Chandra Chekuri. Cs 598csc: Approximation algorithms, lecture 12. https://courses.engr.illinois.edu/cs598csc/sp2011/lectures/lecture_12.pdf. Accessed: 2023-10-19.
  11. Minimax and applications, volume 4. Springer Science & Business Media, 1995.
  12. Warm-starting quantum optimization. Quantum, 5:479, 2021.
  13. Paul Erdős. Problems and results in graph theory and combinatorial analysis. Proc. British Combinatorial Conj., 5th, pages 169–192, 1975.
  14. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.4028, 2014.
  15. Quantum algorithms for fixed qubit architectures. arXiv:1703.06199, 2017.
  16. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm needs to see the whole graph: A typical case. arXiv preprint, 2020.
  17. Threshold-based quantum optimization. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), pages 137–147. IEEE, 2021.
  18. Ian Glendinning. Rotations on the bloch sphere, 2010.
  19. Transferability of optimal QAOA parameters between random graphs. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), pages 171–180. IEEE, 2021.
  20. Lower bounds on quantum annealing times. Physical Review Letters, 130(14):140601, 2023.
  21. Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 42(6):1115–1145, 1995.
  22. Max cut in cubic graphs. Journal of Algorithms, 53(2):169–185, 2004.
  23. Extremal bipartite subgraphs of cubic triangle-free graphs. Journal of Graph Theory, 6(2):115–121, 1982.
  24. Alignment between initial state and mixer improves qaoa performance for constrained optimization. npj Quantum Information, 9(1):121, 2023.
  25. From the quantum approximate optimization algorithm to a quantum alternating operator ansatz. Algorithms, 12(2), 2019.
  26. Near-optimal quantum circuit for grover’s unstructured search using a transverse field. Physical Review A, 95(6):062317, 2017.
  27. Stephen C Locke. Maximum k-colorable subgraphs. Journal of Graph Theory, 6(2):123–132, 1982.
  28. A depth-progressive initialization strategy for quantum approximate optimization algorithm. Mathematics, 11(9):2176, 2023.
  29. T Parthasarathy. On games over the unit square. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 19(2):473–476, 1970.
  30. Classical symmetries and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm. Quantum Information Processing, 20:1–28, 2021.
  31. Maurice Sion. On general minimax theorems. 1958.
  32. Parameter transfer for quantum approximate optimization of weighted maxcut. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, 4(3):1–15, 2023.
  33. Recursive greedy initialization of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm with guaranteed improvement. Physical Review A, 107(6):062404, 2023.
  34. Quantum annealing initialization of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm. quantum, 5:491, 2021.
  35. W Staton. Edge deletions and the chromatic number. Ars Combin, 10:103–106, 1980.
  36. Bridging classical and quantum with sdp initialized warm-starts for qaoa. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, 4(2):1–39, 2023.
  37. Warm-Started QAOA with Custom Mixers Provably Converges and Computationally Beats Goemans-Williamson’s Max-Cut at Low Circuit Depths. Quantum, 7:1121, September 2023.
  38. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17:261–272, 2020.
  39. J v. Neumann. Zur theorie der gesellschaftsspiele. Mathematische annalen, 100(1):295–320, 1928.
  40. Quantum approximate optimization algorithm for maxcut: A fermionic view. Physical Review A, 97(2):022304, 2018.
  41. Maxcut quantum approximate optimization algorithm performance guarantees for p>1𝑝1p>1italic_p > 1. Physical Review A, 103(4):042612, 2021.
  42. X y mixers: Analytical and numerical results for the quantum alternating operator ansatz. Physical Review A, 101(1):012320, 2020.
  43. x⁢y𝑥𝑦xyitalic_x italic_y mixers: Analytical and numerical results for the quantum alternating operator ansatz. Phys. Rev. A, 101:012320, Jan 2020.
  44. Triangle-free subcubic graphs with minimum bipartite density. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 98(3):516–537, 2008.
  45. Xuding Zhu. Bipartite subgraphs of triangle-free subcubic graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 99(1):62–83, 2009.
  46. Adaptive quantum approximate optimization algorithm for solving combinatorial problems on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Research, 4:033029, Jul 2022.
  47. Quantum approximate optimization algorithm: Performance, mechanism, and implementation on near-term devices. Physical Review X, 10(2):021067, 2020.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com