Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Well-Connected Set and Its Application to Multi-Robot Path Planning (2402.11766v1)

Published 19 Feb 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: Parking lots and autonomous warehouses for accommodating many vehicles/robots adopt designs in which the underlying graphs are \emph{well-connected} to simplify planning and reduce congestion. In this study, we formulate and delve into the \emph{largest well-connected set} (LWCS) problem and explore its applications in layout design for multi-robot path planning. Roughly speaking, a well-connected set over a connected graph is a set of vertices such that there is a path on the graph connecting any pair of vertices in the set without passing through any additional vertices of the set. Identifying an LWCS has many potential high-utility applications, e.g., for determining parking garage layout and capacity, as prioritized planning can be shown to be complete when start/goal configurations belong to an LWCS. In this work, we establish that computing an LWCS is NP-complete. We further develop optimal and near-optimal LWCS algorithms, with the near-optimal algorithm targeting large maps. A complete prioritized planning method is given for planning paths for multiple robots residing on an LWCS.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. P. R. Wurman, R. D’Andrea, and M. Mountz, “Coordinating hundreds of cooperative, autonomous vehicles in warehouses,” AI magazine, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 9–9, 2008.
  2. T. Guo and J. Yu, “Toward efficient physical and algorithmic design of automated garages,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01305, 2023.
  3. K. Azadeh, R. De Koster, and D. Roy, “Robotized and automated warehouse systems: Review and recent developments,” Transportation Science, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 917–945, 2019.
  4. F. Caron, G. Marchet, and A. Perego, “Optimal layout in low-level picker-to-part systems,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 101–117, 2000.
  5. T. Guo and J. Yu, “Sub-1.5 Time-Optimal Multi-Robot Path Planning on Grids in Polynomial Time,” in Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, New York City, NY, USA, June 2022.
  6. Z. Yan, N. Jouandeau, and A. A. Cherif, “A survey and analysis of multi-robot coordination,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 399, 2013.
  7. W. Sheng, Q. Yang, J. Tan, and N. Xi, “Distributed multi-robot coordination in area exploration,” Robotics and autonomous systems, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 945–955, 2006.
  8. H. Ma, J. Li, T. K. S. Kumar, and S. Koenig, “Lifelong multi-agent path finding for online pickup and delivery tasks,” in AAMAS, 2017.
  9. H. Ma, D. Harabor, P. J. Stuckey, J. Li, and S. Koenig, “Searching with consistent prioritization for multi-agent path finding,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, no. 01, 2019, pp. 7643–7650.
  10. M. Čáp, J. Vokřínek, and A. Kleiner, “Complete decentralized method for on-line multi-robot trajectory planning in well-formed infrastructures,” in Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 2015.
  11. P. Surynek, “An optimization variant of multi-robot path planning is intractable,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 24, no. 1, 2010.
  12. J. Yu and S. M. LaValle, “Structure and intractability of optimal multi-robot path planning on graphs,” in Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2013.
  13. M. A. Erdmann and T. Lozano-Pérez, “On multiple moving objects,” Algorithmica, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 477–521, 1987.
  14. D. Silver, “Cooperative pathfinding.” Aiide, vol. 1, pp. 117–122, 2005.
  15. R. E. Tarjan, “Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms,” SIAM journal on computing, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 146–160, 1972.
  16. H. W. Kuhn, “The hungarian method for the assignment problem,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 1-2, pp. 83–97, 1955.
  17. J. Yu and S. M. LaValle, “Multi-agent path planning and network flow,” in Algorithmic foundations of robotics X.   Springer, 2013, pp. 157–173.
  18. J. Yu and M. LaValle, “Distance optimal formation control on graphs with a tight convergence time guarantee,” in 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).   IEEE, 2012, pp. 4023–4028.
  19. L. R. Ford and D. R. Fulkerson, “Maximal flow through a network,” Canadian journal of Mathematics, vol. 8, pp. 399–404, 1956.
  20. N. Sturtevant, “Benchmarks for grid-based pathfinding,” Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 144 – 148, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://web.cs.du.edu/~sturtevant/papers/benchmarks.pdf
  21. K. Okumura, M. Machida, X. Défago, and Y. Tamura, “Priority inheritance with backtracking for iterative multi-agent path finding,” in IJCAI, 2019.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com