Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Optimistic Estimation of Convergence in Markov Chains with the Average-Mixing Time (2402.10506v2)

Published 16 Feb 2024 in math.ST, math.PR, and stat.TH

Abstract: The convergence rate of a Markov chain to its stationary distribution is typically assessed using the concept of total variation mixing time. However, this worst-case measure often yields pessimistic estimates and is challenging to infer from observations. In this paper, we advocate for the use of the average-mixing time as a more optimistic and demonstrably easier-to-estimate alternative. We further illustrate its applicability across a range of settings, from two-point to countable spaces, and discuss some practical implications.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (47)
  1. A. Agarwal and J. C. Duchi. The generalization ability of online algorithms for dependent data. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 59(1):573–587, 2012.
  2. Mixing and average mixing times for general Markov processes. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, 64(3):541–552, 2021.
  3. Random walks on the random graph. The Annals of Probability, 46(1):456–490, 2018.
  4. S. Bernstein. Sur l’extension du théorème limite du calcul des probabilités aux sommes de quantités dépendantes. Mathematische Annalen, 97:1–59, 1927.
  5. R. C. Bradley. Basic properties of strong mixing conditions. a survey and some open questions. Probability Surveys, 2:107–144, 2005.
  6. Graphs of linear growth have bounded treewidth. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.13720, 2022.
  7. S. Chib and E. Greenberg. Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The american statistician, 49(4):327–335, 1995.
  8. Chernoff-Hoeffding bounds for Markov chains: Generalized and simplified. In 29th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2012). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2012.
  9. On the Lambert W function. Advances in Computational mathematics, 5:329–359, 1996.
  10. Y. A. Davydov. Convergence of distributions generated by stationary stochastic processes. Theory of Probability & Its Applications, 13(4):691–696, 1968.
  11. Y. A. Davydov. Mixing conditions for markov chains. Theory of Probability & Its Applications, 18(2):312–328, 1974.
  12. Markov chains. Springer, 2018.
  13. P. Doukhan. Mixing: properties and examples, volume 85. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  14. E. Eberlein. Weak convergence of partial sums of absolutely regular sequences. Statistics & probability letters, 2(5):291–293, 1984.
  15. Speeding up random walk mixing by starting from a uniform vertex. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2208, 2022.
  16. W. Hastings. Monte carlo sampling methods using markov chains and their applications. Biometrika, pages 97–109, 1970.
  17. W. Hoeffding. Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301):13–30, 1963. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500830.
  18. Mixing time estimation in reversible Markov chains from a single sample path. Ann. Appl. Probab., 29(4):2439–2480, 08 2019. doi: 10.1214/18-AAP1457. URL https://doi.org/10.1214/18-AAP1457.
  19. I. A. Ibragimov. Some limit theorems for stationary processes. Theory of Probability & Its Applications, 7(4):349–382, 1962.
  20. Finite Markov chains: with a new appendix ”Generalization of a fundamental matrix”. Springer, 1983.
  21. A. Khaleghi and G. Lugosi. Inferring the mixing properties of an ergodic process. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.07054, 2021.
  22. I. Kontoyiannis and S. P. Meyn. Geometric ergodicity and the spectral gap of non-reversible Markov chains. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 154(1-2):327–339, 2012.
  23. Markov chains and mixing times, second edition. American Mathematical Soc., 2009.
  24. L. Lovász and R. Kannan. Faster mixing via average conductance. In Proceedings of the thirty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 282–287, 1999.
  25. Estimating beta-mixing coefficients via histograms. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 9(2):2855 – 2883, 2015. doi: 10.1214/15-EJS1094. URL https://doi.org/10.1214/15-EJS1094.
  26. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The journal of chemical physics, 21(6):1087–1092, 1953.
  27. A. Y. Mitrophanov. Stability and exponential convergence of continuous-time markov chains. Journal of applied probability, 40(4):970–979, 2003.
  28. M. Mohri and A. Rostamizadeh. Stability bounds for stationary ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ-mixing and β𝛽\betaitalic_β-mixing processes. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11(26):789–814, 2010. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v11/mohri10a.html.
  29. F. Münch and J. Salez. Mixing time and expansion of non-negatively curved markov chains. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08294, 2022.
  30. Split conformal prediction for dependent data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15885, 2022.
  31. R. Ortner. Regret bounds for reinforcement learning via Markov chain concentration. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 67:115–128, 2020.
  32. D. Paulin. Concentration inequalities for Markov chains by Marton couplings and spectral methods. Electron. J. Probab, 20(79):1–32, 2015.
  33. Y. Peres and P. Sousi. Mixing times are hitting times of large sets. Journal of Theoretical Probability, 28(2):488–519, 2015.
  34. E. Rio. Covariance inequalities for strongly mixing processes. In Annales de l’IHP Probabilités et statistiques, volume 29, pages 587–597, 1993.
  35. E. Rio. Théorie asymptotique des processus aléatoires faiblement dépendants, volume 31. Springer Science & Business Media, 1999.
  36. M. Rosenblatt. A central limit theorem and a strong mixing condition. Proceedings of the national Academy of Sciences, 42(1):43–47, 1956.
  37. A. Sinclair. Algorithms for random generation and counting: a Markov chain approach. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  38. V. I. Trofimov. Graphs with polynomial growth. Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik, 51(2):405, 1985.
  39. M. Vidyasagar. Learning and generalisation: with applications to neural networks. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
  40. V. Volkonskii and Y. A. Rozanov. Some limit theorems for random functions. i. Theory of Probability & Its Applications, 4(2):178–197, 1959.
  41. G. Wolfer. Empirical and instance-dependent estimation of Markov chain and mixing time. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 2023+. doi: 10.1111/sjos.12686.
  42. G. Wolfer and A. Kontorovich. Statistical estimation of ergodic Markov chain kernel over discrete state space. Bernoulli, 27(1):532–553, 02 2021. doi: 10.3150/20-BEJ1248. URL https://doi.org/10.3150/20-BEJ1248.
  43. G. Wolfer and A. Kontorovich. Improved estimation of relaxation time in nonreversible Markov chains. Ann. Appl. Probab., 34(1A):249–276, 2024. ISSN 1050-5164. doi: 10.1214/23-AAP1963.
  44. G. Wolfer and S. Watanabe. Geometric aspects of data-processing of Markov chains. arXiv:2203.04575, 2022.
  45. B. Yu. Density estimation in the l∞superscript𝑙l^{\infty}italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT norm for dependent data with applications to the gibbs sampler. The Annals of Statistics, pages 711–735, 1993.
  46. B. Yu. Rates of convergence for empirical processes of stationary mixing sequences. The Annals of Probability, pages 94–116, 1994.
  47. L. Zanetti and S. John. Personal communication, 2023.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper introduces average-mixing time as a new measure that offers more realistic and optimistic convergence estimates compared to traditional worst-case scenarios.
  • It develops a rigorous framework for analyzing mixing properties across finite, countable, and infinite state spaces, enhancing theoretical understanding.
  • The paper proposes efficient estimation techniques from single trajectories, facilitating practical applications in machine learning and statistical methods.

An Academic Overview of "Optimistic Estimation of Convergence in Markov Chains with the Average-Mixing Time"

The paper "Optimistic Estimation of Convergence in Markov Chains with the Average-Mixing Time" by Geoffrey Wolfer and Pierre Alquier presents an alternative to the conventional total variation mixing time to evaluate the convergence of Markov chains. The authors introduce the notion of average-mixing time, which aims to provide a more optimistic and potentially more practical measure of convergence for Markov chains. The results provide significant insights into mixing properties, estimation techniques, and implications for machine learning and statistical methods.

Key Contributions and Findings

  1. Average-Mixing Time as an Alternative Measure: The authors propose the average-mixing time as a new measure of convergence, which contrasts the typical pessimistic estimates provided by worst-case scenarios. This metric is asserted to be more realistic in practical applications where the worst-case analysis may not always reflect observations. It shows potential for faster convergence in some Markov chains compared to the traditional measure.
  2. Implications Across Different Settings: The paper examines the applicability of the average-mixing time to various state spaces, including finite, countable, and even infinite spaces, demonstrating its versatility. The work provides a detailed mathematical framework to analyze different properties of Markov chains under this new metric.
  3. Estimation From Empirical Observations: The authors offer methods for estimating the average-mixing time from a single trajectory of observations. They show that this estimation process can be statistically less demanding than estimating the worst-case mixing time, especially for large or infinite state spaces. The results could facilitate practical implementations in data science and analytic applications.
  4. Relation to β-Mixing and Practical Applicability: The research connects average-mixing time to β-mixing, termed as "stationary β-mixing", emphasizing its relevance in real-world machine learning problems involving weakly-dependent data. This relationship can be exploited for analyzing bounded deviations and executing decoupling techniques which are critical in statistical learning.
  5. Numerical and Theoretical Results: The paper demonstrates how the proposed method can lead to tangible benefits numerically and theoretically. It provides explicit estimation bounds, variance analysis, and proposes efficient computation strategies in different scenarios.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

The paper suggests that average-mixing time can offer a more practical measure in applications ranging from reinforcement learning to Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, where traditional worst-case measures can be overly conservative. The theoretical basis and derived results enhance the understanding of convergence behavior in Markov processes, potentially leading to optimized algorithms in computational statistics and beyond.

Future Developments

The introduction of the average-mixing time opens several avenues for future research. One potential development is refining the estimation methods for broader applicability or integrating this measure into adaptive algorithms that can dynamically adjust based on empirical data. Furthermore, exploring its impact on the theoretical front, such as improving bounds and studying deeper connections with statistical mechanics or ergodic theory, will be vital.

Overall, the work of Wolfer and Alquier provides a valuable addition to the toolkit for analyzing Markov chains with implications that resonate across artificial intelligence, data science, and statistical methodologies, underscoring the potential shifts in both theoretical perspectives and practical implementations.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown