Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
129 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Zak-OTFS and LDPC Codes (2402.09551v1)

Published 14 Feb 2024 in cs.IT, eess.SP, and math.IT

Abstract: Orthogonal Time Frequency Space (OTFS) is a framework for communications and active sensing that processes signals in the delay-Doppler (DD) domain. It is informed by 6G propagation environments, where Doppler spreads measured in kHz make it more and more difficult to estimate channels, and the standard model-dependent approach to wireless communication is starting to break down. We consider Zak-OTFS where inverse Zak transform converts information symbols mounted on DD domain pulses to the time domain for transmission. Zak-OTFS modulation is parameterized by a delay period $\tau_{p}$ and a Doppler period $\nu_{p}$, where the product $\tau_{p}\nu_{p}=1$. When the channel spread is less than the delay period, and the Doppler spread is less than the Doppler period, the Zak-OTFS input-output relation can be predicted from the response to a single pilot symbol. The highly reliable channel estimates concentrate around the pilot location, and we configure low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes that take advantage of this prior information about reliability. It is advantageous to allocate information symbols to more reliable bins in the DD domain. We report simulation results for a Veh-A channel model where it is not possible to resolve all the paths, showing that LDPC coding extends the range of Doppler spreads for which reliable model-free communication is possible. We show that LDPC coding reduces sensitivity to the choice of transmit filter, making bandwidth expansion less necessary. Finally, we compare BER performance of Zak-OTFS to that of a multicarrier approximation (MC-OTFS), showing LDPC coding amplifies the gains previously reported for uncoded transmission.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani, A. Chockalingam and R. Calderbank, “OTFS - A Mathematical Foundation for Communication and Radar Sensing in the Delay-Doppler Domain," in IEEE BITS the Inf. Theory Mag., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 36–55, 1 Nov. 2022.
  2. S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani, A. Chockalingam, and R. Calderbank. “OTFS–Predictability in the Delay-Doppler Domain and its Value to Communication and Radar Sensing." preprint arXiv:2302.08705 (2023).
  3. ITU-R M.1225, “Guidelines for evaluation of radio transmission technologies for IMT-2000,” Int. Telecommun. Union Radio Commun., 1997.
  4. R. V. Nee, and R. Prasad, “OFDM for wireless multimedia communications,” Artech House Inc., 2000.
  5. T. Wang, J. G. Proakis, E. Masry and J. R. Zeidler, “Performance Degradation of OFDM Systems due to Doppler Spreading,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 5, no. 6, June 2006.
  6. B. Dabak, E. Tiryaki, R. Calderbank and A. Hareedy, “LDPC Decoders Prefer More Reliable Parity Bits: Unequal Data Protection Over BSC,” 2023 12th Int. Symp. on Topics in Coding, Brest, France, 2023, pp. 1–5.
  7. T. P. Fowdur, and B. N. Furzun, “Performance of IEEE 802.11n LDPC codes with modified reliability based hybrid ARQ and Unequal Error Protection,” IEEE EUROCON 2015 - Int. Conf. on Computer as a Tool (EUROCON), Salamanca, Spain, 2015, pp. 1–6.
  8. T.P. Fowdur, Y. Beeharry, and K.M.S Soyjaudah, “Performance of LTE Turbo Codes with Joint Source Channel Decoding, Adaptive Scaling and Prioritised QAM Constellation Mapping,” Int. J. on Advances in Telecommun., vol. 6 no. 3 & 4, 2013, pp.143–152.
  9. T. Thaj, E. Viterbo and Y. Hong, “General I/O Relations and Low-Complexity Universal MRC Detection for All OTFS Variants,” in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 96026–96037, 2022.
  10. “Best Readings in Orthogonal Time Frequency Space (OTFS) and Delay Doppler Signal Processing,” June 2022. https://www.comsoc.org/publications/best-readings/orthogonal-timefrequency-space-otfs-and-delay-doppler-signal-processing
  11. R. Hadani and A. Monk, “OTFS: A New Generation of Modulation Addressing the Challenges of 5G,” arXiv:1802.02623[cs.IT], Feb. 2018.
  12. V. Khammammetti and S. K. Mohammed, “Spectral Efficiency of OTFS Based Orthogonal Multiple Access With Rectangular Pulses,” in IEEE Trans. on Veh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 12989–13006, Dec. 2022.
  13. Z. Ding, R. Schober, P. Fan and H. Vincent Poor, “OTFS-NOMA: An Efficient Approach for Exploiting Heterogenous User Mobility Profiles,” in IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 7950–7965, Nov. 2019.
  14. D.E, Hocevar, “A reduced complexity decoder architecture via layered decoding of LDPC codes,” in Proc. IEEE Workshop on Signal Process. Syst. (SIPS) 2004, Austin, TX, Oct. 2004, pp. 107–112.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.