Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Multi-modality transrectal ultrasound video classification for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer (2402.08987v2)

Published 14 Feb 2024 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous cancer in the world. Recently, multi-modality transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has increasingly become an effective tool for the guidance of prostate biopsies. With the aim of effectively identifying prostate cancer, we propose a framework for the classification of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) from multi-modality TRUS videos. The framework utilizes two 3D ResNet-50 models to extract features from B-mode images and shear wave elastography images, respectively. An adaptive spatial fusion module is introduced to aggregate two modalities' features. An orthogonal regularized loss is further used to mitigate feature redundancy. The proposed framework is evaluated on an in-house dataset containing 512 TRUS videos, and achieves favorable performance in identifying csPCa with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.84. Furthermore, the visualized class activation mapping (CAM) images generated from the proposed framework may provide valuable guidance for the localization of csPCa, thus facilitating the TRUS-guided targeted biopsy. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/2313595986/ProstateTRUS.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. “Cancer statistics, 2023,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 17–48, 2023.
  2. A. Matoso and J. I. Epstein, “Defining clinically significant prostate cancer on the basis of pathological findings,” Histopathology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 135–145, 2019.
  3. “EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer - 2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent,” European Urology, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 243–262, 2021.
  4. “Magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” European Urology, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 438–450, 2015.
  5. “Recent advances in image-guided targeted prostate biopsy,” Abdominal Imaging, vol. 40, pp. 1788–1799, 2015.
  6. “Transrectal quantitative shear wave elastography in the detection and characterisation of prostate cancer,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 27, pp. 3280–3287, 2013.
  7. “Extracellular matrix: the gatekeeper of tumor angiogenesis,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1543–1555, 2019.
  8. “A nomogram based on a multiparametric ultrasound radiomics model for discrimination between malignant and benign prostate lesions,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 11, pp. 610785, 2021.
  9. “Automated multiparametric localization of prostate cancer based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics,” European Radiology, vol. 30, pp. 806–815, 2020.
  10. “Three-dimensional convolutional neural network model to identify clinically significant prostate cancer in transrectal ultrasound videos: a prospective, multi-institutional, diagnostic study,” EClinicalMedicine, vol. 60, 2023.
  11. “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016, pp. 770–778.
  12. “Joint-phase attention network for breast cancer segmentation in DCE-MRI,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 224, pp. 119962, 2023.
  13. Z. Wang and Y. Hong, “A2FSeg: Adaptive multi-modal fusion network for medical image segmentation,” in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 2023, pp. 673–681.
  14. “Neural photo editing with introspective adversarial networks,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2016.
  15. “Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2017, pp. 618–626.
  16. “Deep attentive features for prostate segmentation in 3D transrectal ultrasound,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2768–2778, 2019.
  17. “Non-iterative scribble-supervised learning with pacing pseudo-masks for medical image segmentation,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 238, pp. 122024, 2024.
  18. Y. Zhong and Y. Wang, “SimPLe: Similarity-aware propagation learning for weakly-supervised breast cancer segmentation in DCE-MRI,” in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 2023, pp. 567–577.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Hong Wu (132 papers)
  2. Juan Fu (2 papers)
  3. Hongsheng Ye (2 papers)
  4. Yuming Zhong (5 papers)
  5. Xuebin Zhou (1 paper)
  6. Jianhua Zhou (7 papers)
  7. Yi Wang (1038 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.