Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Forecasting high-impact research topics via machine learning on evolving knowledge graphs (2402.08640v2)

Published 13 Feb 2024 in cs.DL, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: The exponential growth in scientific publications poses a severe challenge for human researchers. It forces attention to more narrow sub-fields, which makes it challenging to discover new impactful research ideas and collaborations outside one's own field. While there are ways to predict a scientific paper's future citation counts, they need the research to be finished and the paper written, usually assessing impact long after the idea was conceived. Here we show how to predict the impact of onsets of ideas that have never been published by researchers. For that, we developed a large evolving knowledge graph built from more than 21 million scientific papers. It combines a semantic network created from the content of the papers and an impact network created from the historic citations of papers. Using machine learning, we can predict the dynamic of the evolving network into the future with high accuracy, and thereby the impact of new research directions. We envision that the ability to predict the impact of new ideas will be a crucial component of future artificial muses that can inspire new impactful and interesting scientific ideas.

PDF HTML Abstract

Forecasting High-Impact Research Topics with Machine Learning on Evolving Knowledge Graphs

Introduction

The volume of scientific literature has grown exponentially, making it increasingly difficult for researchers to sift through vast amounts of information to find impactful ideas and potential collaborations outside of their immediate areas of expertise. Traditional metrics for assessing the impact of scientific work, such as citation counts, require the research to be fully conducted and published, often resulting in a delayed measurement of an idea's impact. Addressing this gap, the paper under discussion presents a novel approach to predicting the potential impact of research ideas at their onset, prior to publication, by leveraging machine learning techniques applied to evolving knowledge graphs.

Methodology

The core of the approach lies in the construction of a large-scale evolving knowledge graph, synthesized from over 21 million scientific publications. This knowledge graph is dual-layered, comprising a semantic network that captures the content and relationships between concepts across the papers, and an impact network that maps the citation dynamics among these papers over time. Through the integration of these networks, the authors developed a predictive model employing machine learning algorithms capable of forecasting future trends and impacts in scientific research based on the current and historical state of the knowledge graph.

Results

The model demonstrated a high degree of accuracy in predicting the evolution of the knowledge graph and, by extension, the impact of emerging research topics. Notably, the machine learning model provides insights into which areas of research are poised to gain significance, even before any specific outcomes have been published. By doing so, it offers a powerful tool for researchers to identify promising directions for investigation early on, potentially accelerating scientific discovery and fostering cross-disciplinary collaborations.

Implications

The practical implications of this work are manifold. For individual researchers, the ability to foresee high-impact areas of research can guide the allocation of resources and focus, enhancing the probability of making significant contributions. From an institutional perspective, funding bodies and research institutions could utilize these predictions to strategically support projects and fields with high potential for impact, optimizing the return on investment in scientific research.

On a theoretical level, this paper illustrates the potential of combining semantic analysis with citation dynamics to forecast the trajectory of scientific knowledge development. This methodological innovation opens the door to further exploration of the underlying patterns that drive research impact, which could refine our understanding of scientific progress.

Future Directions

The predictive capabilities developed through this paper suggest several avenues for future research. Enhancing the model's accuracy and granularity could enable the prediction of the impact of more narrowly defined topics or ideas, offering more personalized guidance to researchers. Additionally, expanding the knowledge graph to include more diverse sources of data, such as patents, industry publications, and social media discourse, could provide a more comprehensive view of the knowledge landscape, revealing the interdisciplinary and applied implications of emerging research.

As the model and its underpinning data sources evolve, it also becomes conceivable to integrate real-time data analysis, making it possible to dynamically adjust predictions based on the latest developments in scientific discourse. Such advancements could pave the way for the development of artificial intelligence-driven "muses" that constantly analyze the scientific landscape to inspire new, impactful research ideas across disciplines.

In conclusion, while the paper abstains from sensational claims, its methodological contributions and findings offer a promising approach to navigating the increasingly complex world of scientific research. By leveraging evolving knowledge graphs and machine learning, it provides a novel tool for predicting the future impact of scientific ideas, potentially accelerating the pace of discovery and fostering a more interconnected scientific community.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. D. Wang and A.-L. Barabási, The science of science (Cambridge University Press, 2021).
  2. L. Bornmann, R. Haunschild, and R. Mutz, Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8, 1 (2021).
  3. OpenAI, Gpt-4 technical report, arXiv:2303.08774  (2023).
  4. Google, Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models, arXiv:2312.11805  (2023).
  5. V. Martínez, F. Berzal, and J.-C. Cubero, A survey of link prediction in complex networks, ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 49, 1 (2016).
  6. M. Krenn and A. Zeilinger, Predicting research trends with semantic and neural networks with an application in quantum physics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 1910 (2020).
  7. Challenge the impact factor, Nature Biomedical Engineering 1, 0103 (2017).
  8. The many facets of impact, Nature Reviews Physics 6, 71 (2024).
  9. A.-L. Barabási, The formula: The universal laws of success (Hachette UK, 2018).
  10. D. Wang, C. Song, and A.-L. Barabási, Quantifying long-term scientific impact, Science 342, 127 (2013).
  11. L. Wu, D. Wang, and J. A. Evans, Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology, Nature 566, 378 (2019).
  12. J. W. Weis and J. M. Jacobson, Learning on knowledge graph dynamics provides an early warning of impactful research, Nature Biotechnology 39, 1300 (2021).
  13. L. Fu and C. Aliferis, Using content-based and bibliometric features for machine learning models to predict citation counts in the biomedical literature, Scientometrics 85, 257 (2010).
  14. C. Stegehuis, N. Litvak, and L. Waltman, Predicting the long-term citation impact of recent publications, Journal of informetrics 9, 642 (2015).
  15. L. Weihs and O. Etzioni, Learning to predict citation-based impact measures, in 2017 ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries (JCDL) (IEEE, 2017) pp. 1–10.
  16. E. van Nieuwenburg, E. Bairey, and G. Refael, Learning phase transitions from dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 98, 060301 (2018).
  17. A. V. Leeuwenhoek, Ii. microscopical observations on the blood vessels and membranes of the intestines. in a letter to the royal society from mr. anthony van leeuwenhoek, frs, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 26, 53 (1709).
  18. E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
  19. A.-L. Barabási, Network Science (Cambridge University Press, 2016).
  20. Y. Lu, Predicting research trends in artificial intelligence with gradient boosting decision trees and time-aware graph neural networks, in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (IEEE, 2021) pp. 5809–5814.
  21. T. Fawcett, Roc graphs: Notes and practical considerations for researchers, Machine learning 31, 1 (2004).
  22. A. V. Belikov, A. Rzhetsky, and J. Evans, Prediction of robust scientific facts from literature, Nature Machine Intelligence 4, 445 (2022).
  23. J. G. Foster, A. Rzhetsky, and J. A. Evans, Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies, American Sociological Review 80, 875 (2015).
  24. J. Sourati and J. A. Evans, Accelerating science with human-aware artificial intelligence, Nature Human Behaviour 7, 1682 (2023).
  25. A. A. Salatino, F. Osborne, and E. Motta, How are topics born? understanding the research dynamics preceding the emergence of new areas, PeerJ Computer Science 3, e119 (2017).
  26. A. A. Salatino, F. Osborne, and E. Motta, Augur: forecasting the emergence of new research topics, in Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE on joint conference on digital libraries (2018) pp. 303–312.
  27. J. G. Foster, F. Shi, and J. Evans, Surprise! measuring novelty as expectation violation, SocArXiv 2t46f  (2021).
  28. F. Shi and J. Evans, Surprising combinations of research contents and contexts are related to impact and emerge with scientific outsiders from distant disciplines, Nature Communications 14, 1641 (2023).
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Xuemei Gu (17 papers)
  2. Mario Krenn (74 papers)
Citations (4)
View on Semantic Scholar