Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Tuning Structural and Electronic Properties of Metal-Organic Framework 5 by Metal Substitution and Linker Functionalization

Published 12 Feb 2024 in cond-mat.mtrl-sci | (2402.07733v1)

Abstract: The chemical flexibility of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) offers an ideal platform to tune structure and composition for specific applications, from gas sensing to catalysis and from photoelectric conversion to energy storage. This variability gives rise to a large configurational space that can be efficiently explored using high-throughput computational methods. In this work, we investigate from first principles the structural and electronic properties of MOF-5 variants obtained by replacing Zn with Be, Mg, Cd, Ca, Sr, and Ba, and by functionalizing the originally H-passivated linkers with CH$_3$, NO$_2$, Cl, Br, NH$_2$, OH, and COOH groups. To build and analyze the resulting 56 structures, we employ density-functional theory calculations embedded in an in-house developed library for automatized calculations. Our findings reveal that structural properties are mainly defined by metal atoms and large functional groups which distort the lattice and modify coordination. Stability is largely influenced by functionalization and enhanced by COOH and OH groups which promote the formation of hydrogen bonds. The charge distribution within the linker is especially influenced by functional groups with electron-withdrawing character while the metal nodes play a minor role. Likewise, the band-gap size is crucially determined by ligand functionalization. The smallest gaps are found with NH$_2$ and OH groups which introduce localized orbitals at the top of the valence band. This characteristic makes these functionalizations particularly promising for the design of MOF-5 variants with enhanced gas uptake and sensing properties.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)
  1. S. L. James, Chem. Soc. Rev. 32, 276 (2003).
  2. H.-D. Saßnick and C. Cocchi, J. Chem. Phys.  156, 104108 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0082710 .
  3. K. Momma and F. Izumi, J. Appl. Cryst.  44, 1272 (2011).
  4. K. T. Butler, C. H. Hendon,  and A. Walsh, “Crystal structures,”  (2015).
  5. W. Haynes, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 95th ed. (CRC Press, 2014).
  6. F. Jensen, Introduction to Computational Chemistry, 2nd ed. (Wiley, 2007).
  7. H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).
  8. A. a. E. R. J. Otero-de-la Roza and V. Luaña, Comput. Phys. Commun.  185, 1007 (2014).
  9. R. Bader and P. Zou, Chem. Phys. Lett.  191, 54 (1992).
  10. M. Yu and D. R. Trinkle, J. Chem. Phys.  134, 064111 (2011).
  11. R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 751 (1976).
  12. S. J. Blanksby and G. B. Ellison, Acc. Chem. Res.  36, 255 (2003).
  13. J. P. Perdew and M. Levy, Phys. Rev. Lett.  51, 1884 (1983).

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 4 likes about this paper.