Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Trustful Coopetitive Infrastructures for the New Space Exploration Era (2402.06014v1)

Published 8 Feb 2024 in cs.RO, cs.CE, cs.MA, cs.SE, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: In the new space economy, space agencies, large enterprises, and start-ups aim to launch space multi-robot systems (MRS) for various in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) purposes, such as mapping, soil evaluation, and utility provisioning. However, these stakeholders' competing economic interests may hinder effective collaboration on a centralized digital platform. To address this issue, neutral and transparent infrastructures could facilitate coordination and value exchange among heterogeneous space MRS. While related work has expressed legitimate concerns about the technical challenges associated with blockchain use in space, we argue that weighing its potential economic benefits against its drawbacks is necessary. This paper presents a novel architectural framework and a comprehensive set of requirements for integrating blockchain technology in MRS, aiming to enhance coordination and data integrity in space exploration missions. We explored distributed ledger technology (DLT) to design a non-proprietary architecture for heterogeneous MRS and validated the prototype in a simulated lunar environment. The analyses of our implementation suggest global ISRU efficiency improvements for map exploration, compared to a corresponding group of individually acting robots, and that fostering a coopetitive environment may provide additional revenue opportunities for stakeholders.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (78)
  1. Fabchain: Managing Audit-Able 3D Print Job over Blockchain. In IEEE Int. Conf. Blockchain and Cryptocurrency. IEEE, Shanghai, China, 9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBC54727.2022.9805519
  2. A Survey on Blockchain in Robotics: Issues, Opportunities, Challenges and Future Directions. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 196 (Dec. 2021), 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103245
  3. Blockchain Solutions for Multi-Agent Robotic Systems: Related Work and Open Questions. In Proc. 24th Conf. Open Innov. Assoc. (FRUCT’24). FRUCT Oy, Helsinki, Uusimaa, FIN, 551–555. https://doi.org/10.5555/3338290.3338366
  4. George A. Akerlof. 1970. The Market for ”Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 3 (Aug. 1970), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
  5. Mohammad Alfraheed and Abdullah Al-Zaghameem. 2013. Exploration and Cooperation Robotics on the Moon. Journal of Signal and Information Processing 04, 03 (Jan. 2013), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsip.2013.43033
  6. Khalid Husain Ansari and Umesh Kulkarni. 2020. Implementation of Ethereum Request for Comment (ERC20) Token. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Science & Technology. Elsevier, Rochester, NY, 6. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3561395
  7. Scientific Exploration of Challenging Planetary Analog Environments with a Team of Legged Robots. Science Robotics 8, 80 (July 2023), eade9548. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.ade9548
  8. Renan Lima Baima and Esther Luna Colombini. 2021. Modeling Object’s Affordances via Reward Functions. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, Melbourne, Australia, 2183–2190. https://doi.org/10.1109/smc52423.2021.9658915
  9. Gianluigi Baldesi. 2017. Beyond Bitcoin: Leveraging the Blockchain for Space 4.0. https://www.esa.int/About_Us/Digital_Agenda/Beyond_Bitcoin_Leveraging_the_Blockchain_for_Space_4.0
  10. Applying a Cloud Computing Approach to Storage Architectures for Spacecraft. In 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference. IEEE, Big Sky, Montana, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero.2013.6497340
  11. Governance in the Blockchain Economy: A Framework and Research Agenda. JAIS 19, 10 (2018), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00518
  12. Contractual Arrangements Between Providers and Consumers of Digital Technologies in Space Industry. In Digital Economy and the New Labor Market: Jobs, Competences and Innovative HR Technologies (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems), Svetlana Igorevna Ashmarina and Valentina Vyacheslavovna Mantulenko (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60926-9_19
  13. Juan Benet. 2014. IPFS - Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File System. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1407.3561 arXiv:1407.3561
  14. Mariel Borowitz. 2019. Strategic Implications of the Proliferation of Space Situational Awareness Technology and Information: Lessons Learned from the Remote Sensing Sector. Space Policy 47 (Feb. 2019), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.05.002
  15. Blockchains: A Systematic Multivocal Literature Review. Comput. Surveys 53, 3, Article 61 (July 2020), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369052
  16. Trusted Registration, Negotiation, and Service Evaluation in Multi-Agent Systems throughout the Blockchain Technology. In Int. Conf. on Web Int. IEEE, Santiago, Chile, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/WI.2018.0-107
  17. Goals for Space Exploration Based on Stakeholder Value Network Considerations. Acta Astronautica 68 (2011), 2088–2097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.11.003
  18. Developing a Framework for Make-or-buy Decisions. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20, 11 (Jan. 2000), 1313–1330. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010348271
  19. Christian Catalini and Joshua S. Gans. 2020. Some Simple Economics of the Blockchain. cacm 63 (2020), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359552
  20. How Falling Launch Costs Are Fueling the Thriving Space Industry. https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/space-launch-costs-growing-business-industry-rcna23488.
  21. Integrating Blockchain for Data Sharing and Collaboration Support in Scientific Ecosystem Platform. In Proc. of the Hawaii Int.Conf. on Sys. Sci. IEEE, Hawaii, 10. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.031
  22. Lesley Conn. 2021. Global Space Economy Nears $447B. https://www. thespacereport.org/uncategorized/global-space-economy-nears-447b/.
  23. Consensys Space. 2018. Open Source Space. https://www.consensys.space/
  24. Ian A. Crawford. 2015. Lunar Resources: A Review. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 39, 2 (April 2015), 137–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314567585
  25. Société Européenne des Satellites. 2021. SES Satellite Telecommunications Network Provider. https://www.ses.com/
  26. COROB-X: a cooperative robot team for the exploration of lunar skylights. In ASTRA 2022 16th Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics and Automation. ESA-ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands, 9. https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-03751549
  27. Market-Based Multirobot Coordination: A Survey and Analysis. Proc. IEEE 94, 7 (July 2006), 1257–1270. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2006.876939
  28. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt and Melissa E. Graebner. 2007. Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. AMJ 50, 1 (Feb. 2007), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
  29. European Space Agency. 2019. Blockchain and Earth Observation: a white paper. https://eo4society.esa.int/2019/04/09/blockchain-and-earth-observation-a-white-paper/ Section: Publications.
  30. Eduardo Castelló Ferrer. 2019. The Blockchain: A New Framework for Robotic Swarm Systems. In Proc. Future Technol. Conf. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 881). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1037–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02683-7_77
  31. Primavera De Filippi and Andrea Leiter. 2021. Blockchain in Outer Space. Amer. Jour. of Int. Law 115 (2021), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2021.63
  32. Yang Gao and Steve Chien. 2017. Review on Space Robotics: Toward Top-Level Science through Space Exploration. Science Robotics 2, 7 (June 2017), eaan5074. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aan5074
  33. Lunar Volatiles Mobile Instrumentation (LUVMI) Project Results. In IAC-19 SYMPOSIUMS (A3 IAF SPACE EXPLORATION SYMPOSIUM, Vol. A3). IAC, Washington, DC, USA, 9. https://doi.org/10.3030/727220
  34. An Architecture for Decentralized, Collaborative, and Autonomous Robots. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA). IEEE, Seattle, WA, 75–7509. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA.2018.00017
  35. Robotics Software Engineering: A Perspective from the Service Robotics Domain. In Proc. of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on Eur. Soft. Eng. Conf. and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. ACM, Virtual Event USA, 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368089.3409743
  36. Shahla Ghobadi and John D’Ambra. 2011. Coopetitive Knowledge Sharing: An Analytical Review of Literature. Elec. Jour. of Know. Manag. 9, 4 (2011), 307–317.
  37. Blockchain Lunar Registry. https://diana.io.
  38. An In-depth Investigation of the Performance Characteristics of Hyperledger Fabric. Computers and Industrial Engineering 173 (2022), 108716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108716
  39. Probably Something: A Multi-Layer Taxonomy of Non-Fungible Tokens. Internet Research ahead-of-print, ahead-of-print (Jan. 2023), 26. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-08-2022-0666 arXiv:2209.05456 [cs]
  40. Machine Economies. Electronic Markets 33, 1 (July 2023), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00649-0
  41. The Blockchain Effect: From Inter-Ecosystem to Intra-Ecosystem Competition. In ECIS 2021 Proceedings (Research Papers). AIS, Marrakech, Morocco, 16. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021_rp/36
  42. Literature Review of Blockchain Technology in Space Industry: Challenges and Applications. In Int. Conf. Electron. Eng. IEEE, Menouf, Egypt, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEM52022.2021.9480642
  43. Brian Israel. 2020. Space Governance 3.0. Georgia Journ. of Int. & Comp. Law 48, 3 (2020), 16. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/gjicl/vol48/iss3/7
  44. Challenges and Common Solutions in Smart Contract Development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 48, 11 (Dec. 2022), 4291–4318. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2021.3116808
  45. Robonomics Based on Blockchain as a Principle of Creating Smart Factories. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Intern. of Thin.: Sys., Manag. and Sec. IEEE, Valencia, Spain, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/IoTSMS.2018.8554864
  46. EUROPA: A Case Study for Teaching Sensors, Data Acquisition and Robotics via a ROS-based Educational Robot. Sensors 20, 9 (2020), 2469. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092469
  47. Blockchain Technology with Applications to Distributed Control and Cooperative Robotics: A Survey. Int. Jour. of Rob. and Cont. 2 (2019), 36. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijrc.v2n1p36
  48. Nathan Koenig and Andrew Howard. 2004. Design and Use Paradigms for Gazebo, an Open-Source Multi-Robot Simulator. In IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Inte. Rob. and Sys. IEEE, Sendai, Japan, 2149–2154. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2004.1389727
  49. Amanda M. Leon. 2018. Mining for Meaning: An Examination of the Legality of Property Rights in Space Resources. Virginia Law Review 104 (2018), 497–546.
  50. Blockchain-Based Crowdsourcing Framework with Distributed Task Assignment and Solution Verification. Hindawi Security and Communication Networks 2022 (Jan. 2022), 16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9464308
  51. ESA-ESRIC Space Resources Challenge - Prospecting Technologies - Call. https://www.spaceresourceschallenge.esa.int
  52. Ralph D. Lorenz. 2020. How Far Is Far Enough? Requirements Derivation for Planetary Mobility Systems. Advances in Space Research 65, 5 (March 2020), 1383–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.12.011
  53. How Open Science Helps Researchers Succeed. eLife 5 (July 2016), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.16800
  54. Thomas Heinz Meitinger. 2017. Smart contracts. Informatik Spektrum 40, 4 (Aug. 2017), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-017-1045-2
  55. Abdulkadir Memduhoglu and Melih Basaraner. 2018. Possible Contributions of Spatial Semantic Methods and Technologies to Multi-Representation Spatial Database Paradigm. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 3, 3 (Oct. 2018), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.413473
  56. Space Decentral: A Decentralized Autonomous Space Agency.
  57. A Planning Ontology to Represent and Exploit Planning Knowledge for Performance Efficiency. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.13549 arXiv:2307.13549 [cs]
  58. NASA. 2016. Space Technology Roadmaps and Priorities Revisited. Technical Report. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23582
  59. The Present and Future of the Space Sector: A Business Ecosystem Approach. Space Policy 52 (May 2020), 101374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2020.101374
  60. Lynne E. Parker. 2008. Multiple Mobile Robot Systems. In Springer Handbook of Robotics, Bruno Siciliano and Oussama Khatib (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 921–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_41
  61. A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 3 (Dec. 2007), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222240302
  62. ROS: An Open-Source Robot Operating System. In ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software, Vol. 3. IEEE, Kobe, Japan, 5. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ROS%3A-an-open-source-Robot-Operating-System-Quigley/d45eaee8b2e047306329e5dbfc954e6dd318ca1e
  63. Market Approaches to the Multi-Robot Task Allocation Problem: A Survey. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 107, 2 (Feb. 2023), 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10846-022-01803-0
  64. Cooperative Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systems: A Survey. csur 52 (2019), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303848
  65. Decision Making in Multiagent Systems: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems 10, 3 (Sept. 2018), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcds.2018.2840971
  66. Reconfigurable Integrated Multirobot Exploration System (RIMRES): Heterogeneous Modular Reconfigurable Robots for Space Exploration. Journal of Field Robotics 31, 1 (2014/01//Jan/Feb2014), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21477
  67. The ARCHES Space-Analogue Demonstration Mission: Towards Heterogeneous Teams of Autonomous Robots for Collaborative Scientific Sampling in Planetary Exploration. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5, 4 (2020), 5315–5322. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2020.3007468
  68. The Transparency Challenge of Blockchain in Organizations. Electronic Markets 32 (2022), 1779—1794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00536-0
  69. The Artemis Program: An Overview of NASA’s Activities to Return Humans to the Moon. In IEEE Aerosp. Conf. IEEE, Big Sky, MT, USA, 10. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero47225.2020.9172323
  70. Managing Byzantine Robots via Blockchain Technology in a Swarm Robotics Collective Decision Making Scenario. In Proc. 17th Int. Conf. Auton. Agents MultiAgent Syst. (AAMAS ’18). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Stockholm, Sweden, 541–549. https://doi.org/10.5555/3237383.3237464
  71. REALMS 2 -RESILIENT EXPLORATION AND LUNAR MAPPING SYSTEM 2. In Proceedings of ASTRA 2023. ASTRA, Leyden, Netherlands, 1 – 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1127496
  72. A Survey and Analysis of Multi-Robot Coordination. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 10, 12 (Dec. 2013), 399. https://doi.org/10.5772/57313
  73. A Survey of Multi-Agent Trust Management Systems. IEEE Access 1 (2013), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2013.2259892
  74. Incentivizing Data Quality in Blockchains for Inter-Organizational Networks - Learning from the Digital Car Dossier. In Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Syst. AIS, San Francisco, USA, 18. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-157909
  75. Group-Symmetric Consensus for Nonholonomic Mobile Multirobot Systems in Coopetition Networks. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 236, 7 (April 2022), 3743–3754. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062211045482
  76. SpaceChain - Community-Based Space Platform. https://spacechain.com/
  77. Distributed Ledger Technologies for M2M Communications. In Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Netw. IEEE, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1109/icoin.2019.8718115
  78. Multi-Robot Exploration Controlled by a Market Economy. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Vol. 3. IEEE, Washington, USA, 3016–3023. https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.2002.1013690
Citations (4)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now