Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Exponential Separation Between Powers of Regular and General Resolution Over Parities (2402.04364v2)

Published 6 Feb 2024 in cs.CC

Abstract: Proving super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of proofs of unsatisfiability of Boolean formulas using resolution over parities is an outstanding problem that has received a lot of attention after its introduction by Raz and Tzamaret [Ann. Pure Appl. Log.'08]. Very recently, Efremenko, Garl\'ik and Itsykson [ECCC'23] proved the first exponential lower bounds on the size of ResLin proofs that were additionally restricted to be bottom-regular. We show that there are formulas for which such regular ResLin proofs of unsatisfiability continue to have exponential size even though there exists short proofs of their unsatisfiability in ordinary, non-regular resolution. This is the first super-polynomial separation between the power of general ResLin and and that of regular ResLin for any natural notion of regularity. Our argument, while building upon the work of Efremenko et al., uses additional ideas from the literature on lifting theorems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. An exponential separation between regular and general resolution. Theory of Computing, 3(5):81–102, 2007. Preliminary version in STOC, 2002.
  2. On disperser/lifting properties of the index and inner-product functions. In Yael Tauman Kalai, editor, 14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, ITCS 2023, January 10-13, 2023, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, volume 251 of LIPIcs, pages 14:1–14:17. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2023.
  3. Query-to-communication lifting using low-discrepancy gadgets. SIAM J. Comput., 50(1):171–210, 2021. Preliminary version in ICALP, 2019.
  4. Lifting to parity decision trees via stifling. In Yael Tauman Kalai, editor, 14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, ITCS 2023, January 10-13, 2023, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, volume 251 of LIPIcs, pages 33:1–33:20. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2023.
  5. Hardness against linear branching programs and more. In Amnon Ta-Shma, editor, 38th Computational Complexity Conference, CCC 2023, July 17-20, 2023, Warwick, UK, volume 264 of LIPIcs, pages 9:1–9:27. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2023.
  6. Lower bounds for regular resolution over parities. Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex., TR23-187, 2023.
  7. Monotone circuit lower bounds from resolution. Theory Comput., 16:1–30, 2020. Preliminary version in STOC 2018.
  8. Query-to-communication lifting for BPP. SIAM J. Comput., 49(4), 2020. Preliminary version in FOCS 2017.
  9. Linear branching programs and directional affine extractors. In Shachar Lovett, editor, 37th Computational Complexity Conference, CCC 2022, July 20-23, 2022, Philadelphia, PA, USA, volume 234 of LIPIcs, pages 4:1–4:16. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2022.
  10. Lower bounds for splittings by linear combinations. In Erzsébet Csuhaj-Varjú, Martin Dietzfelbinger, and Zoltán Ésik, editors, Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2014 - 39th International Symposium, MFCS 2014, Budapest, Hungary, August 25-29, 2014. Proceedings, Part II, volume 8635 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 372–383. Springer, 2014.
  11. Explicit directional affine extractors and improved hardness for linear branching programs. CoRR, abs/2304.11495, 2023.
  12. Pavel Pudlák. On extracting computations from propositional proofs (a survey). In Kamal Lodaya and Meena Mahajan, editors, IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, FSTTCS 2010, December 15-18, 2010, Chennai, India, volume 8 of LIPIcs, pages 30–41. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2010.
  13. Resolution over linear equations and multilinear proofs. Ann. Pure Appl. Log., 155(3):194–224, 2008.
  14. Alexander A. Razborov. Unprovability of lower bounds on circuit size in certain fragments of bounded-arithmetic. Izvestiya. Math., 59(1):205–227, 1995.
  15. Alexander A. Razborov. A new kind of tradeoffs in propositional proof complexity. J. ACM, 63(2):16:1–16:14, 2016.
  16. Dmitry Sokolov. Dag-like communication and its applications. In Pascal Weil, editor, Computer Science - Theory and Applications - 12th International Computer Science Symposium in Russia, CSR 2017, Kazan, Russia, June 8-12, 2017, Proceedings, volume 10304 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 294–307. Springer, 2017.
  17. Alasdair Urquhart. A near-optimal separation of regular and general resolution. SIAM J. Comput., 40(1):107–121, 2011.
  18. Simplified and improved separations between regular and general resolution by lifting. In Luca Pulina and Martina Seidl, editors, Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing - SAT 2020 - 23rd International Conference, Alghero, Italy, July 3-10, 2020, Proceedings, volume 12178 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 182–200. Springer, 2020.
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.