Dynamic Realization Games in Newsvendor Inventory Centralization (2402.04149v1)
Abstract: Consider a set N of n (>1) stores with single-item and single-period nondeterministic demands like in a classic newsvendor setting with holding and penalty costs only. Assume a risk-pooling single-warehouse centralized inventory ordering option. Allocation of costs in the centralized inventory ordering corresponds to modelling it as a cooperative cost game whose players are the stores. It has been shown that when holding and penalty costs are identical for all subsets of stores, the game based on optimal expected costs has a non empty core (Hartman et. al., 2000, Muller \textit{et. al.}, 2002). In this paper we examine a related inventory centralization game based on demand realizations that has, in general, an empty core even with identical penalty and holding costs (Hartman and Dror, 2005). We propose a repeated cost allocation scheme for dynamic realization games based on allocation processes introduced by Lehrer (2002a). We prove that the cost subsequences of the dynamic realization game process, based on Lehrer's rules, converge almost surely to either a least square value or the core of the expected game. We extend the above results to more general dynamic cost games and relax the independence hypothesis of the sequence of players' demands at different stages.
- Anupindi, R. and Y. Bassok, (1999). “Centralization of stocks: Retailers vs. Manufacturer”, Management Science 45, 178-191
- Blackwell, D. (1956). “An analog of the MinMax Theorem for vector payoffs”, Pacific J. of Math., 6, 1-8.
- Burer, S. and M. Dror (2006). “Convex optimization of centralized inventory operation”, submitted for publication.
- Chen, M.-S. and C.-T. Lin, (1989). “Effects of Centralization on Expected Costs in a Multi-location Newsboy Problem”, Journal of the Operational Research Society 40, 597-602.
- Eppen, G. D., (1979). “Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem”, Management Science 25, 498-501.
- Fernandez F. R., J. Puerto L. and M. J. Zafra, (2002). “Cores of Stochastic cooperative games”, International Game Theory Review 4, 3, 265-280.
- Granot, D. (1977). “Cooperative games in stochastic function form”, Management Science 23, 621-630.
- Hartman, B. C. and M. Dror, (1996). “Cost allocation in continuous review inventory models” Naval Research Logistics Journal 43, 549-561.
- Hartman, B. C. and M. Dror, (2003). “Optimizing centralized inventory operations in a cooperative game theory setting”, IIE Transactions on Operations Engineering 35, 243-257.
- Hartman, B. C. and M. Dror, (2005). “Allocation of gains from inventory centralization in newsvendor environments”, IIE Transactions on Scheduling and Logistics 37, 93-107.
- Hartman, B. C., M. Dror, and M. Shaked, (2000). “Cores of inventory centralization games”, Games and Economic Behavior 31, 26-49.
- Lehrer, E., (2002a), “Allocation process in cooperative games”, International Journal of Game Theory 31, 341-351.
- Lehrer, E., (2002b), “Approachability in infinite dimensional spaces”, International Journal of Game Theory 31, 253-268.
- Muller, A., M. Scarsini, and M. Shaked, (2002). “The newsvendor game has a nonempty core”, Games and Economic Behavior 38, 118-126.
- Naurus J.A. and J.C. Anderson, (1996). “Rethinking distribution”, Harvard Business Review, July-Aug 1996, 113-120.
- Parlar, M., (1988). “Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demands”, Naval Research Logistics 35, 397-409.
- Ruiz, L.M., F. Valenciano, and J.M. Zarzuelo, (1998). “The family of least square values for transferable utility games”, Games and Economic Behavior 24, 109-130.
- Slikker, M., J. Fransoo, and M. Wouters, (2005). “Cooperation between multiple news-vendors with transshipment”, European J. of Operational Research 167, 370-380.
- Suijs J., (2000) “Cooperative Decision-Making under Risk”. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
- Timmer, J., (2006). “The compromise value for cooperative games with random payoffs”, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 64, 95-106.
- Timmer, J., P. Borm, and S. Tijs, (2003). “On three Shapley-like solutions for cooperative games with random payoffs”, International Journal of Game Theory 32, 595-613.
- Timmer, J., P. Borm, and S. Tijs, (2005). “Convexity in stochastic cooperative situations”, International Game Theory Review 7, 25-42.