The Green Mirage: Impact of Location- and Market-based Carbon Intensity Estimation on Carbon Optimization Efficacy (2402.03550v1)
Abstract: In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on reducing the carbon emissions from electricity consumption. Many organizations have set ambitious targets to reduce the carbon footprint of their operations as a part of their sustainability goals. The carbon footprint of any consumer of electricity is computed as the product of the total energy consumption and the carbon intensity of electricity. Third-party carbon information services provide information on carbon intensity across regions that consumers can leverage to modulate their energy consumption patterns to reduce their overall carbon footprint. In addition, to accelerate their decarbonization process, large electricity consumers increasingly acquire power purchase agreements (PPAs) from renewable power plants to obtain renewable energy credits that offset their "brown" energy consumption. There are primarily two methods for attributing carbon-free energy, or renewable energy credits, to electricity consumers: location-based and market-based. These two methods yield significantly different carbon intensity values for various consumers. As there is a lack of consensus which method to use for carbon-free attribution, a concurrent application of both approaches is observed in practice. In this paper, we show that such concurrent applications can cause discrepancies in the carbon savings reported by carbon optimization techniques. Our analysis across three state-of-the-art carbon optimization techniques shows possible overestimation of up to 55.1% in the carbon reductions reported by the consumers and even increased emissions for consumers in some cases. We also find that carbon optimization techniques make different decisions under the market-based method and location-based method, and the market-based method can yield up to 28.2% less carbon savings than those claimed by the location-based method for consumers without PPAs.
- Sobhy M Abdelkader. 2007. Transmission loss allocation through complex power flow tracing. IEEE transactions on Power Systems 22, 4 (2007), 2240–2248.
- AIB. 2023. European Residual Mixes. Retrieved July 19, 2023 from https://www.aib-net.org/sites/default/files/assets/facts/residual-mix/2022/AIB_2022_Residual_Mix_Results_.pdf
- Clean Energy Buyers Association. 2023. CEBA Deal Tracker. Retrieved Sept 25, 2023 from https://cebuyers.org/deal-tracker/
- Janusz Bialek. 1996. Tracing the flow of electricity. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution 143, 4 (1996), 313–320.
- Renewable energy certificates threaten the integrity of corporate science-based targets. Nature Climate Change 12, 6 (2022), 539–546.
- Creative accounting: A critical perspective on the market-based method for reporting purchased electricity (scope 2) emissions. Energy Policy 112 (2018), 29–33.
- Carbon-Aware EV Charging. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm). IEEE, 186–192.
- Tracking emissions in the US electricity system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 51 (2019), 25497–25502.
- Electricity Maps. 2022. Retrieved July 28, 2022 from https://electricitymap.org/
- EPA. 2022a. Financial PPA. Retrieved July 23, 2023 from https://www.epa.gov/green-power-markets/financial-ppa
- EPA. 2022b. Physical PPA. Retrieved July 18, 2023 from https://www.epa.gov/green-power-markets/physical-ppa#one
- EPA. 2023. Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs). Retrieved July 14, 2023 from https://www.epa.gov/green-power-markets/renewable-energy-certificates-recs
- FlexiDAO. 2023. The Energy and Emissions Data Management Platform. Retrieved December 13, 2023 from https://www.flexidao.com/
- Granularity Matters: Filling the data gap for granular carbon accounting. Retrieved December 13, 2023 from https://www.flexidao.com/resources/report-granularity-matters
- It’s not easy being green. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 42, 4 (2012), 211–222.
- Google. 2021. 24x7 Carbon-Free Energy: Methodologies and Metrics. Retrieved July 14, 2023 from https://www.gstatic.com/gumdrop/sustainability/24x7-carbon-free-energy-methodologies-metrics.pdf
- Green-e. 2019. 2019 Green-e® Residual Mix Emissions Rates (2017 Data). Retrieved July 14, 2023 from https://www.green-e.org/2019-residual-mix
- CarbonScaler: Leveraging Cloud Workload Elasticity for Optimizing Carbon-Efficiency. Proc. ACM Meas. Anal. Comput. Syst. 7, 3, Article 57 (dec 2023), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626788
- Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770–778.
- Electricity accounting in life cycle assessment: the challenge of double counting. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (2023), 1–17.
- Flow tracing as a tool set for the analysis of networked large-scale renewable electricity systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 96 (2018), 390–397.
- Carbon efficient smart charging using forecasts of marginal emission factors. Journal of Cleaner Production 284 (2021), 124766.
- Daniel Kirschen and Goran Strbac. 1999. Tracing active and reactive power between generators and loads using real and imaginary currents. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 14, 4 (1999), 1312–1319.
- Carbon flow tracing method for assessment of demand side carbon emissions obligation. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 4, 4 (2013), 1100–1107.
- Bringing Carbon Awareness to Multi-cloud Application Delivery. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Sustainable Computer Systems. 1–6.
- CarbonCast: multi-day forecasting of grid carbon intensity. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation. 198–207.
- DACF: day-ahead carbon intensity forecasting of power grids using machine learning. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems. 188–192.
- Electricity Maps. 2018. Electricity Maps. Retrieved July 18, 2023 from https://www.electricitymaps.com/blog/green-electricity-contracts
- Electricity Maps. 2022. Granular electricity data for scope 2 carbon accounting. Retrieved Sept 25, 2023 from https://www.electricitymaps.com/data-portal
- Electricity Maps. 2023. Electricity Maps. Retrieved July 18, 2023 from https://app.electricitymaps.com/zone/NO-NO3
- United Nations. 2023. 24/7 Carbon-free Energy Compact. Retrieved July 14, 2023 from https://www.un.org/en/energy-compacts/page/compact-247-carbon-free-energy.
- PowerLedger. 2023. PPA Vision. Retrieved Sept 25, 2023 from https://www.powerledger.io/platform-features/ppa-vision
- Carbon-aware computing for datacenters. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 38, 2 (2022), 1270–1280.
- Principal Cross-Border Flow Patterns in the European Electricity Markets. In 2019 16th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM). IEEE, 1–6.
- Real-time carbon accounting method for the European electricity markets. Energy Strategy Reviews 26 (2019), 100367.
- Power flow tracing in a simplified highly renewable European electricity network. New Journal of Physics 17, 10 (2015), 105002.
- United Nations. 2020. Carbon neutrality by 2050: the world’s most urgent mission. Retrieved July 19, 2023 from https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/articles/2020-12-11/carbon-neutrality-2050-the-world%E2%80%99s-most-urgent-mission
- United Nations Climate Action. 2023. For a livable climate: Net-zero commitments must be backed by credible action. Retrieved July 23, 2023 from https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/net-zero-coalition
- United Satets Environmental Protection Agency. 2021. Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Scope 2 Guidance. Retrieved July 18, 2022 from https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/Scope%202%20Guidance_Final_Sept26.pdf
- Watttime. 2022. Watttime: The Power to Choose Clean Energy. https://www.watttime.org/.
- Let’s wait awhile: How temporal workload shifting can reduce carbon emissions in the cloud. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Middleware Conference. 260–272.
- Diptyaroop Maji (2 papers)
- Noman Bashir (32 papers)
- David Irwin (32 papers)
- Prashant Shenoy (57 papers)
- Ramesh K. Sitaraman (16 papers)