Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

An end-to-end deep learning pipeline to derive blood input with partial volume corrections for automated parametric brain PET mapping (2402.03414v1)

Published 5 Feb 2024 in eess.IV, cs.CV, and cs.LG

Abstract: Dynamic 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (dFDG-PET) for human brain imaging has considerable clinical potential, yet its utilization remains limited. A key challenge in the quantitative analysis of dFDG-PET is characterizing a patient-specific blood input function, traditionally reliant on invasive arterial blood sampling. This research introduces a novel approach employing non-invasive deep learning model-based computations from the internal carotid arteries (ICA) with partial volume (PV) corrections, thereby eliminating the need for invasive arterial sampling. We present an end-to-end pipeline incorporating a 3D U-Net based ICA-net for ICA segmentation, alongside a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) based MCIF-net for the derivation of a model-corrected blood input function (MCIF) with PV corrections. The developed 3D U-Net and RNN was trained and validated using a 5-fold cross-validation approach on 50 human brain FDG PET datasets. The ICA-net achieved an average Dice score of 82.18% and an Intersection over Union of 68.54% across all tested scans. Furthermore, the MCIF-net exhibited a minimal root mean squared error of 0.0052. The application of this pipeline to ground truth data for dFDG-PET brain scans resulted in the precise localization of seizure onset regions, which contributed to a successful clinical outcome, with the patient achieving a seizure-free state after treatment. These results underscore the efficacy of the ICA-net and MCIF-net deep learning pipeline in learning the ICA structure's distribution and automating MCIF computation with PV corrections. This advancement marks a significant leap in non-invasive neuroimaging.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. Application of annihilation coincidence detection to transaxial reconstruction tomography. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med., 16(3):210–224, Mar 1975.
  2. M. Muzi et al. Quantitative assessment of dynamic pet imaging data in cancer imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 30(9):1203–1215, Nov 2012.
  3. Fdg pet of infection and inflammation. RadioGraphics, 25(5):1357–1368, Sep 2005.
  4. Fdg pet/ct used in identifying adult-onset still’s disease in connective tissue diseases. Clin. Rheumatol., 39(9):2735–2742, Sep 2020.
  5. M. Grkovski et al. Monitoring early response to chemoradiotherapy with 18f-fmiso dynamic pet in head and neck cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 44(10):1682–1691, Sep 2017.
  6. A. Binneboese et al. Correlation between fdg-pet uptake and survival in patients with primary brain tumors. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 11(3):196–206, 2021.
  7. Multimodal deep learning to differentiate tumor progression from treatment effect in human glioblastoma. In International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), April 2023.
  8. R. S. Schetlick et al. Parametric fdg pet quantification, segmentation and classification of primary brain tumors in human gbm. In 2021 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), pages 1–5, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021. IEEE.
  9. Brain pet in suspected dementia: Patterns of altered fdg metabolism. RadioGraphics, 34(3):684–701, May 2014.
  10. Associations between cognitive, functional, and fdg-pet measures of decline in ad and mci. Neurobiology of Aging, 32(7):1207–1218, 2011.
  11. H. Tang et al. Cpne1 is a target of mir-335-5p and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of non-small cell lung cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res., 37(1), Jul 2018.
  12. Dynamic fdg-pet in localization of focal epilepsy: A pilot study. Epilepsy and Behavior, 122:108204, 2021.
  13. M Quigg and B Kundu. Dynamic fdg-pet demonstration of functional brain abnormalities. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, 9(9):1487–1497, 2022.
  14. Fdg-pet imaging in mild traumatic brain injury: a critical review. Frontiers in Neuroenergetics, 5:13, 2014.
  15. E. Guedj et al. 18f-fdg brain pet hypometabolism in patients with long covid. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 48(9):2823–2833, Aug 2021.
  16. Quantitative approaches of dynamic fdg-pet and pet/ct studies (dpet/ct) for the evaluation of oncological patients. Cancer Imaging, 12(1):283–289, 2012.
  17. K. A. Wangerin et al. A virtual clinical trial comparing static versus dynamic pet imaging in measuring response to breast cancer therapy. Phys. Med. Biol., 62(9):3639–3655, May 2017.
  18. J. J. Vaquero and P. Kinahan. Positron emission tomography: Current challenges and opportunities for technological advances in clinical and preclinical imaging systems. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 17(1):385–414, Dec 2015.
  19. B. G. Oertel et al. Necessity and risks of arterial blood sampling in healthy volunteer studies. Clin. Pharmacokinet., 51(10):629–638, Oct 2012.
  20. E. Croteau et al. Image-derived input function in dynamic human pet/ct: methodology and validation with 11c-acetate and 18f-fluorothioheptadecanoic acid in muscle and 18f-fluorodeoxyglucose in brain. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 37(8):1539–1550, Aug 2010.
  21. C. H. Lyoo et al. Image-derived input function derived from a supervised clustering algorithm: Methodology and validation in a clinical protocol using [11c](r)-rolipram. PLoS ONE, 9(2):e89101, Feb 2014.
  22. Advances in functional and structural mr image analysis and implementation as fsl. Neuroimage, 23:S208–S219, 2004.
  23. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in fsl. Neuroimage, 45:S173–S186, 2009.
  24. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage, 17:825–841, 2002.
  25. Fsl. Neuroimage, 62:782–790, 2012.
  26. M. Jenkinson and S. Smith. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical Image Analysis, 5:143–156, 2001.
  27. 3d u-net: Learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2016, pages 424–432. Springer, 2016.
  28. Model corrected blood input function to compute cerebral fdg uptake rates from dynamic total-body pet images of rats in vivo. Front. Med. (Lausanne), 8:618645, Apr 2021.
  29. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735–1780, 1997.
  30. On the properties of neural machine translation: Encoder-decoder approaches. In Proceedings of SSST-8, Eighth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation, pages 103–111, 2014.
  31. A deep learning pipeline for parametric fdg brain pet mapping in localization of focal epilepsy. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 64(supplement 1):P808, June 2023.
  32. Data augmentation using generative adversarial networks (cyclegan) to improve generalizability in ct segmentation tasks. Sci. Rep., 9(1):16884, Dec 2019.
  33. Medical transformer: Gated axial-attention for medical image segmentation, 2021.
  34. Unetr: Transformers for 3d medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.10504, Oct 2021.
  35. Transformers in time-series analysis: A tutorial. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01138, Apr 2022.
  36. H. Li et al. 3d ifpn: Improved feature pyramid network for automatic segmentation of gastric tumor. Front. Oncol., 11:618496, May 2021.
  37. P. Zanotti-Fregonara et al. Comparison of 3 methods of automated internal carotid segmentation in human brain pet studies: Application to the estimation of arterial input function. J. Nucl. Med., 50(3):461–467, Mar 2009.
  38. D. Huang et al. Learning rich features with hybrid loss for brain tumor segmentation. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 21(S2):63, Jul 2021.
  39. Y. Yang et al. Mh-net: Model-data-driven hybrid-fusion network for medical image segmentation. Knowl.-Based Syst., page 108795, Apr 2022.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.