Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Multi-fidelity physics constrained neural networks for dynamical systems (2402.02031v1)

Published 3 Feb 2024 in cs.LG and physics.flu-dyn

Abstract: Physics-constrained neural networks are commonly employed to enhance prediction robustness compared to purely data-driven models, achieved through the inclusion of physical constraint losses during the model training process. However, one of the major challenges of physics-constrained neural networks consists of the training complexity especially for high-dimensional systems. In fact, conventional physics-constrained models rely on singular-fidelity data necessitating the assessment of physical constraints within high-dimensional fields, which introduces computational difficulties. Furthermore, due to the fixed input size of the neural networks, employing multi-fidelity training data can also be cumbersome. In this paper, we propose the Multi-Scale Physics-Constrained Neural Network (MSPCNN), which offers a novel methodology for incorporating data with different levels of fidelity into a unified latent space through a customised multi-fidelity autoencoder. Additionally, multiple decoders are concurrently trained to map latent representations of inputs into various fidelity physical spaces. As a result, during the training of predictive models, physical constraints can be evaluated within low-fidelity spaces, yielding a trade-off between training efficiency and accuracy. In addition, unlike conventional methods, MSPCNN also manages to employ multi-fidelity data to train the predictive model. We assess the performance of MSPCNN in two fluid dynamics problems, namely a two-dimensional Burgers' system and a shallow water system. Numerical results clearly demonstrate the enhancement of prediction accuracy and noise robustness when introducing physical constraints in low-fidelity fields. On the other hand, as expected, the training complexity can be significantly reduced by computing physical constraint loss in the low-fidelity field rather than the high-fidelity one.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (57)
  1. Techniques for turbulence tripping of boundary layers in rans simulations, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 108 (2022) 661–682.
  2. A coupled 1d–3d numerical method for buoyancy-driven heat transfer in a generic engine bay, Energies 12 (2019) 4156.
  3. Flow dynamics and acoustics from glottal vibrations at different frequencies, in: Acoustics, volume 4, MDPI, 2022, pp. 915–933.
  4. V. Casulli, Semi-implicit finite difference methods for the two-dimensional shallow water equations, Journal of Computational Physics 86 (1990) 56–74.
  5. A. Kurganov, D. Levy, Central-upwind schemes for the saint-venant system, ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 36 (2002) 397–425.
  6. F. Alcrudo, P. Garcia-Navarro, A high-resolution godunov-type scheme in finite volumes for the 2d shallow-water equations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 16 (1993) 489–505.
  7. A wave propagation method for conservation laws and balance laws with spatially varying flux functions, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 24 (2003) 955–978.
  8. Lattice bgk models for navier-stokes equation, Europhysics letters 17 (1992) 479.
  9. X. Shan, H. Chen, Lattice boltzmann model for simulating flows with multiple phases and components, Physical review E 47 (1993) 1815.
  10. Functional input and membership characteristics in the accuracy of machine learning approach for estimation of multiphase flow, Scientific Reports 10 (2020) 17793.
  11. M. Lagha, G. Dufour, Body force modeling of the fan stage of a windmilling turbofan, Journal of Turbomachinery (2021) 1–13.
  12. W. Zuo, Q. Chen, Real-time or faster-than-real-time simulation of airflow in buildings, Indoor air 19 (2009) 33.
  13. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows, Annual review of fluid mechanics 25 (1993) 539–575.
  14. A. T. Mohan, D. V. Gaitonde, A deep learning based approach to reduced order modeling for turbulent flow control using lstm neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.09269 (2018).
  15. D. P. Kingma, M. Welling, Auto-encoding variational bayes, arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114 (2013).
  16. S. Fresca, A. Manzoni, Real-time simulation of parameter-dependent fluid flows through deep learning-based reduced order models, Fluids 6 (2021) 259.
  17. Fastsvd-ml–rom: A reduced-order modeling framework based on machine learning for real-time applications, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 414 (2023) 116155.
  18. S. Hochreiter, J. Schmidhuber, Long short-term memory, Neural computation 9 (1997) 1735–1780.
  19. Reduced-order modeling of advection-dominated systems with recurrent neural networks and convolutional autoencoders, Physics of Fluids 33 (2021).
  20. Convolutional neural network and long short-term memory based reduced order surrogate for minimal turbulent channel flow, Physics of Fluids 33 (2021).
  21. Deep fluids: A generative network for parameterized fluid simulations, in: Computer graphics forum, volume 38, Wiley Online Library, 2019, pp. 59–70.
  22. Machine learning in cardiovascular flows modeling: Predicting arterial blood pressure from non-invasive 4d flow mri data using physics-informed neural networks, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 358 (2020) 112623.
  23. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity, IEEE transactions on image processing 13 (2004) 600–612.
  24. Spatio-temporal deep learning models of 3d turbulence with physics informed diagnostics, Journal of Turbulence 21 (2020) 484–524.
  25. Deep-learning assisted reduced order model for high-dimensional flow prediction from sparse data, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11969 (2023).
  26. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, Journal of Computational physics 378 (2019) 686–707.
  27. Physics-informed machine learning, Nature Reviews Physics 3 (2021) 422–440.
  28. Y. Qu, X. Shi, Can a machine learning–enabled numerical model help extend effective forecast range through consistently trained subgrid-scale models?, Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems 2 (2023) e220050.
  29. Physics-informed machine learning for modeling and control of dynamical systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13867 (2023).
  30. Physics-constrained neural network for solving discontinuous interface k-eigenvalue problem with application to reactor physics, Nuclear Science and Techniques 34 (2023) 161.
  31. Physics-data combined machine learning for parametric reduced-order modelling of nonlinear dynamical systems in small-data regimes, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 404 (2023) 115771.
  32. Embedding hard physical constraints in neural network coarse-graining of three-dimensional turbulence, Physical Review Fluids 8 (2023) 014604.
  33. H. R. Karbasian, B. C. Vermeire, Application of physics-constrained data-driven reduced-order models to shape optimization, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 934 (2022) A32.
  34. Physics-informed autoencoders for lyapunov-stable fluid flow prediction, arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10866 (2019).
  35. Physics-informed machine learning for reduced-order modeling of nonlinear problems, Journal of computational physics 446 (2021) 110666.
  36. Multi-source precipitation data merging for heavy rainfall events based on cokriging and machine learning methods, Remote Sensing 14 (2022) 1750.
  37. A multi-source spatio-temporal data cube for large-scale geospatial analysis, International Journal of Geographical Information Science 36 (2022) 1853–1884.
  38. A graph neural network-based stock forecasting method utilizing multi-source heterogeneous data fusion, Multimedia Tools and Applications 81 (2022) 43753–43775.
  39. Spatial regression of multi-fidelity meteorological observations using a proxy-based measurement error model, Advances in Science and Research 20 (2023) 49–53.
  40. Multi-fidelity surrogate modeling using long short-term memory networks, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering 404 (2023) 115811.
  41. A new variable fidelity optimization framework based on model fusion and objective-oriented sequential sampling, in: International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, volume 48078, 2007, pp. 699–708.
  42. N. Geneva, N. Zabaras, Multi-fidelity generative deep learning turbulent flows, arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.04731 (2020).
  43. J. S. R. Park, X. Zhu, Physics-informed neural networks for learning the homogenized coefficients of multiscale elliptic equations, Journal of Computational Physics 467 (2022) 111420.
  44. Multi-fidelity data fusion through parameter space reduction with applications to automotive engineering, arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14396 (2021).
  45. Non-intrusive reduced-order modeling for fluid problems: A brief review, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 233 (2019) 5896–5912.
  46. Background error covariance iterative updating with invariant observation measures for data assimilation, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 33 (2019) 2033–2051.
  47. Latent-space time evolution of non-intrusive reduced-order models using gaussian process emulation, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 416 (2021) 132797.
  48. Enkf data-driven reduced order assimilation system, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 139 (2022) 46–55.
  49. Air pollution prediction using long short-term memory (lstm) and deep autoencoder (dae) models, Sustainability 12 (2020) 2570.
  50. Generalised latent assimilation in heterogeneous reduced spaces with machine learning surrogate models, Journal of Scientific Computing 94 (2023) 11.
  51. Physics-informed neural networks (pinns) for fluid mechanics: A review, Acta Mechanica Sinica 37 (2021) 1727–1738.
  52. J. Palm, C. Eskilsson, Facilitating large-amplitude motions of wave energy converters in openfoam by a modified mesh morphing approach, International Marine Energy Journal 5 (2022) 257–264.
  53. Efficient very high-order accurate polyhedral mesh finite volume scheme for 3d conjugate heat transfer problems in curved domains, Journal of Computational Physics 445 (2021) 110604.
  54. R. Laubscher, P. Rousseau, Application of a mixed variable physics-informed neural network to solve the incompressible steady-state and transient mass, momentum, and energy conservation equations for flow over in-line heated tubes, Applied Soft Computing 114 (2022) 108050.
  55. Physics informed neural networks for solving flow problems modeled by the shallow water equations (2023).
  56. Multi-fidelity reduced-order surrogate modeling (2023).
  57. Sub-channel cfd for nuclear fuel bundles, Nuclear Engineering and Design 355 (2019) 110318.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Hao Zhou (351 papers)
  2. Sibo Cheng (36 papers)
  3. Rossella Arcucci (50 papers)
Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.