Simulation-Enhanced Data Augmentation for Machine Learning Pathloss Prediction (2402.01969v2)
Abstract: Machine learning (ML) offers a promising solution to pathloss prediction. However, its effectiveness can be degraded by the limited availability of data. To alleviate these challenges, this paper introduces a novel simulation-enhanced data augmentation method for ML pathloss prediction. Our method integrates synthetic data generated from a cellular coverage simulator and independently collected real-world datasets. These datasets were collected through an extensive measurement campaign in different environments, including farms, hilly terrains, and residential areas. This comprehensive data collection provides vital ground truth for model training. A set of channel features was engineered, including geographical attributes derived from LiDAR datasets. These features were then used to train our prediction model, incorporating the highly efficient and robust gradient boosting ML algorithm, CatBoost. The integration of synthetic data, as demonstrated in our study, significantly improves the generalizability of the model in different environments, achieving a remarkable improvement of approximately 12dB in terms of mean absolute error for the best-case scenario. Moreover, our analysis reveals that even a small fraction of measurements added to the simulation training set, with proper data balance, can significantly enhance the model's performance.
- C. Phillips, D. Sicker, and D. Grunwald, “A Survey of Wireless Path Loss Prediction and Coverage Mapping Methods,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 255–270, 2013.
- H. Friis, “A Note on a Simple Transmission Formula,” Proc. of the IRE, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 254–256, May 1946.
- A. G. Longley and P. L. Rice, “Prediction of tropospheric radio transmission loss over irregular terrain. A computer method-1968,” U.S. Department of Commerce, Environmental Sciences Service Administration, Institute for Telecommunication Sciences, Tech. Rep. ERL 79-ITS-67, 1968, https://its.ntia.gov/publications/2784.aspx.
- E. F. Drocella, J. Richards, R. Sole, F. Najmy, A. Lundy, and P. McKenna, “3.5 GHz exclusion zone analyses and methodology,” U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Institute for Telecommunication Sciences, Tech. Rep. TR-15-517, 2016, https://its.ntia.gov/publications/details.aspx?pub=2805.
- “COST Action 231 - Publications Office of the EU,” https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/f2f42003-4028-4496-af95-beaa38fd475f.
- 3GPP, “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Technical report (TR) 38.901, 01 2020, version 16.1.0.
- S. Jaeckel, L. Raschkowski, K. Borner, and L. Thiele, “QuaDRiGa: A 3-D Multi-Cell Channel Model With Time Evolution for Enabling Virtual Field Trials,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 3242–3256, Jun. 2014.
- M. Lawton and J. McGeehan, “The application of a deterministic ray launching algorithm for the prediction of radio channel characteristics in small-cell environments,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 955–969, Nov./1994.
- D. He, B. Ai, K. Guan, L. Wang, Z. Zhong, and T. Kürner, “The Design and Applications of High-Performance Ray-Tracing Simulation Platform for 5G and Beyond Wireless Communications: A Tutorial,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 10–27, 2019.
- V. V. Ratnam et al., “FadeNet: Deep Learning-Based mm-Wave Large-Scale Channel Fading Prediction and its Applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 3278–3290, 2021.
- A. Vanleer and C. R. Anderson, “Improving Propagation Model Predictions via Machine Learning with Engineered Features,” in 2021 IEEE Military Commun. Conf. (MILCOM), Jan. 2021, pp. 420–425.
- G. Reus-Muns, J. Du, D. Chizhik, R. Valenzuela, and K. R. Chowdhury, “Machine Learning-based mmWave Path Loss Prediction for Urban/Suburban Macro Sites,” in GLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference, Feb. 2022, pp. 1429–1434.
- A. Gupta, J. Du, D. Chizhik, R. A. Valenzuela, and M. Sellathurai, “Machine Learning-Based Urban Canyon Path Loss Prediction Using 28 GHz Manhattan Measurements,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 4096–4111, Jun. 2022.
- X. Zhang, X. Shu, B. Zhang, J. Ren, L. Zhou, and X. Chen, “Cellular Network Radio Propagation Modeling with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,” in Proc. of the 26th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. Virtual Event CA USA: ACM, Aug. 2020, pp. 2378–2386.
- Y. Zhang, D. J. Love, J. V. Krogmeier, C. R. Anderson, R. W. Heath, and D. R. Buckmaster, “Challenges and Opportunities of Future Rural Wireless Communications,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 16–22, Dec. 2021.
- C. Tang, S. Vishwakarma, W. Li, R. Adve, S. Julier, and K. Chetty, “Augmenting experimental data with simulations to improve activity classification in healthcare monitoring,” in 2021 IEEE radar conf. (RadarConf21). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–6.
- A. P. Mohamed, A. S. M. M. Jameel, and A. El Gamal, “Knowledge distillation for wireless edge learning,” in 2021 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP). IEEE, 2021, pp. 600–604.
- Y. Zhang, J. A. Tan, B. M. Dorbert, C. R. Anderson, and J. V. Krogmeier, “Simulation-Aided Measurement-Based Channel Modeling for Propagation at 28 GHz in a Coniferous Forest,” in 2020 IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM). Taipei, Taiwan: IEEE, Dec. 2020, pp. 1–6.
- Y. Zhang, J. V. Krogmeier, C. R. Anderson, and D. J. Love, “Large-Scale Cellular Coverage Simulation and Analyses for Follow-Me UAV Data Relay,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., pp. 1–1, 2023.
- CellMapper, “AT&T Mobility (United States of America) - Cellular Coverage and Tower Map,” https://www.cellmapper.net/map?MCC=-1&MNC=-1, https://www.cellmapper.net/map.
- “AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers & Antennas,” https://www.antennasearch.com/.
- S. J. Maeng, H. Kwon, O. Ozdemir, and I. Güvenç, “Impact of 3D Antenna Radiation Pattern in UAV Air-to-Ground Path Loss Modeling and RSRP-based Localization in Rural Area,” IEEE Open J. Antennas and Propag., pp. 1–1, 2023.
- J. Jung and S. Oh, “Indiana statewide digital surface model (2016-2019),” Feb. 2021.
- U. Masood, H. Farooq, and A. Imran, “A machine learning based 3d propagation model for intelligent future cellular networks,” in 2019 IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6.
- V. Abhayawardhana, I. Wassell, D. Crosby, M. Sellars, and M. Brown, “Comparison of empirical propagation path loss models for fixed wireless access systems,” in 2005 IEEE 61st Veh. Technol. Conf., vol. 1. IEEE, 2005, pp. 73–77.