Overcoming Blind Spots: Occlusion Considerations for Improved Autonomous Driving Safety (2402.01507v1)
Abstract: Our work introduces a module for assessing the trajectory safety of autonomous vehicles in dynamic environments marked by high uncertainty. We focus on occluded areas and occluded traffic participants with limited information about surrounding obstacles. To address this problem, we propose a software module that handles blind spots (BS) created by static and dynamic obstacles in urban environments. We identify potential occluded traffic participants, predict their movement, and assess the ego vehicle's trajectory using various criticality metrics. The method offers a straightforward and modular integration into motion planner algorithms. We present critical real-world scenarios to evaluate our module and apply our approach to a publicly available trajectory planning algorithm. Our results demonstrate that safe yet efficient driving with occluded road users can be achieved by incorporating safety assessments into the planning process. The code used in this research is publicly available as open-source software and can be accessed at the following link: https://github.com/TUM-AVS/Frenetix-Occlusion.
- D. Wang, W. Fu, J. Zhou, and Q. Song, “Occlusion-aware motion planning for autonomous driving,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 42 809–42 823, 2023.
- M. Koc, E. Yurtsever, K. Redmill, and U. Oezgüner, “Pedestrian emergence estimation and occlusion-aware risk assessment for urban autonomous driving,” in 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), 2021, pp. 292–297.
- R. Trauth, K. Moller, and J. Betz, “Toward safer autonomous vehicles: Occlusion-aware trajectory planning to minimize risky behavior,” IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, p. 929–942, 2023.
- H. Park, J. Choi, H. Chin, S.-H. Lee, and D. Baek, “Occlusion-aware risk assessment and driving strategy for autonomous vehicles using simplified reachability quantification,” 2023.
- M.-Y. Yu, R. Vasudevan, and M. Johnson-Roberson, “Risk assessment and planning with bidirectional reachability for autonomous driving,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, May 2020.
- L. Wang, C. F. Lopez, and C. Stiller, “Generating efficient behaviour with predictive visibility risk for scenarios with occlusions,” in 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2020, pp. 1–7.
- C. Zhang, S. Ma, M. Wang, G. Hinz, and A. Knoll, “Efficient pomdp behavior planning for autonomous driving in dense urban environments using multi-step occupancy grid maps,” in 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2022, pp. 2722–2729.
- K. H. Wray, B. Lange, A. Jamgochian, S. J. Witwicki, A. Kobashi, S. Hagaribommanahalli, and D. Ilstrup, “Pomdps for safe visibility reasoning in autonomous vehicles,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Safety for Robotics (ISR). IEEE, 2021, pp. 191–195.
- Z. Zhang and J. Fisac, “Safe occlusion-aware autonomous driving via game-theoretic active perception,” in Robotics, ser. Robotics: Science and Systems, D. Shell, M. Toussaint, and M. Hsieh, Eds. United States: MIT Press Journals, 2021.
- M. Koschi and M. Althoff, “Set-based prediction of traffic participants considering occlusions and traffic rules,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 249–265, 2021.
- P. F. Orzechowski, A. Meyer, and M. Lauer, “Tackling occlusions & limited sensor range with set-based safety verification,” in 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1729–1736.
- S. Lee, W. Lim, M. Sunwoo, and K. Jo, “Limited visibility aware motion planning for autonomous valet parking using reachable set estimation,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 4, p. 1520, Feb. 2021.
- Y. Nager, A. Censi, and E. Frazzoli, “What lies in the shadows? safe and computation-aware motion planning for autonomous vehicles using intent-aware dynamic shadow regions,” in 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2019, pp. 5800–5806.
- J. M. G. Sanchez, T. Nyberg, C. Pek, J. Tumova, and M. Torngren, “Foresee the unseen: Sequential reasoning about hidden obstacles for safe driving,” in 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, Jun. 2022.
- B. Gilhuly, A. Sadeghi, P. Yedmellat, K. Rezaee, and S. L. Smith, “Looking for trouble: Informative planning for safe trajectories with occlusions,” in 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2022, pp. 8985–8991.
- P. Narksri, H. Darweesh, E. Takeuchi, Y. Ninomiya, and K. Takeda, “Occlusion-aware motion planning with visibility maximization via active lateral position adjustment,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 57 759–57 782, 2022.
- Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). (2022) Verkehr: Verkehrsunfälle. [Online]. Available: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Verkehrsunfaelle/Publikationen/Downloads-Verkehrsunfaelle/verkehrsunfaelle-jahr-2080700217004.pdf
- Y. Lin and M. Althoff, “Commonroad-crime: A toolbox for criticality measures of autonomous vehicles,” in 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, Jun. 2023.
- S. Sontges, M. Koschi, and M. Althoff, “Worst-case analysis of the time-to-react using reachable sets,” in 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, Jun. 2018.
- W. Wachenfeld, P. Junietz, R. Wenzel, and H. Winner, “The worst-time-to-collision metric for situation identification,” in 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, Jun. 2016.
- J. Eggert, “Predictive risk estimation for intelligent adas functions,” in 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, Oct. 2014.
- M. Geisslinger, F. Poszler, J. Betz, C. Lütge, and M. Lienkamp, “Autonomous driving ethics: from trolley problem to ethics of risk,” Philosophy and Technology, 2021.
- M. Geisslinger, R. Trauth, G. Kaljavesi, and M. Lienkamp, “Maximum acceptable risk as criterion for decision-making in autonomous vehicle trajectory planning,” IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 4, pp. 570–579, 2023.
- M. Brannstrom, J. Sjoberg, and E. Coelingh, “A situation and threat assessment algorithm for a rear-end collision avoidance system,” in 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. IEEE, Jun. 2008.
- D. Asljung, J. Nilsson, and J. Fredriksson, “Using extreme value theory for vehicle level safety validation and implications for autonomous vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 288–297, Dec. 2017.
- T. A. Gennarelli and E. Wodzin, “Ais 2005: a contemporary injury scale,” Injury, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1083–1091, 12 2006.
- M. Althoff, M. Koschi, and S. Manzinger, “Commonroad: Composable benchmarks for motion planning on roads,” in 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2017, pp. 719–726.
- A. P. Morris, N. Haworth, A. Filtness, D.-P. A. Nguatem, L. Brown, A. Rakotonirainy, and S. Glaser, “Autonomous vehicles and vulnerable road-users-important considerations and requirements based on crash data from two countries,” Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 7, 2021.
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and U.S. Department of Transportation, “Comparing demographic trends in vulnerable road user fatalities and the u.s. population, 1980–2019,” 2021.
- P. Olszewski, P. Szagała, D. Rabczenko, and A. Zielińska, “Investigating safety of vulnerable road users in selected eu countries,” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 68, p. 49–57, Feb. 2019.
- N. Puller, H.-J. Gunther, G. Lucas, A. Leschke, and V. Rocco, “Towards increasing vru safety: A map-based and data-driven analysis of accident black spots,” in 2021 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC). IEEE, 11/10/2021 - 11/12/2021, pp. 60–67.