Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Decentralized control methodology for multi-machine/multi-converter power systems (2401.17313v1)

Published 24 Nov 2023 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: In this project we evaluate a framework for synchronization of mixed machine-converter power grids. Synchronous machines are assumed to be actuated by mechanical torque injections, while the converters by DC-side current injections. As this approach is based on model-matching, the converter's modulation angle is driven by the DC-side voltage measurement, while its modulation amplitude is assigned analogously to the electrical machine's excitation current. In this way we provide extensions to the swing-equations model, retaining physical interpretation, and design controllers that achieve various objectives: frequency synchronization while stabilizing an angle configuration and a bus voltage magnitude prescribed by an optimal power flow (OPF) set-point. We further discuss decentralization issues related to clock drifts, loopy graphs, model reduction, energy function selection and characterizations of operating points. Finally, a numerical evaluation is based on experiments from three- and two-bus systems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (12)
  1. M. Colombino, D. Groß, and F. Dörfler, “Global phase and voltage synchronization for power inverters: A decentralized consensus-inspired approach,” in 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).   IEEE, Dec. 2017, pp. 5690–5695.
  2. A. J. Korsak, “On the question of uniqueness of stable load-flow solutions,” in IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. PAS-91.   IEEE, 1972, p. 1093.
  3. e. a. Ali TAYYEBI, “Grid-forming converters – inevitability, control strategies and challenges in future grids application,” in CIRED Workshop - Ljubljana, June 2018.
  4. A. J. V. D. Schaft, L2-gain and passivity techniques in nonlinear control.   Vol. 2. Springer.
  5. M. Maggiore, Introduction to Nonlinear Control Systems.   Lecture Notes.
  6. W. A. Bukhsh, A. Grothey, K. I. M. McKinnon, and P. A. Trodden, “Local solutions of the optimal power flow problem,” in IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28.   IEEE, 2013, p. 4780.
  7. e. a. B. B. Johnson, “Oscillator-based inverter control for islanded three-phase microgrids,” in IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, vol. 4, no. 1.   IEEE, Jan. 2014, pp. 387–395.
  8. C. Arghir and F. Dörfler. Energy-based stabilization of network flows in multi-machine power systems. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.09681
  9. J. W. Chapman and et. al., “Stabilizing a multi-machine power system via decentralized feedback linearizing excitation control,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 8.3.   IEEE, 1993, pp. 830–839.
  10. Chiang and Hsiao-Dong, “Direct methods for stability analysis of electric power systems: theoretical foundation, bcu methodologies, and applications.”   John Wiley and Sons, 2011.
  11. R. Delabays, T. Coletta, and P. Jacquod, “Multistability of phase-locking and topological winding numbers in locally coupled kuramoto models on single-loop networks,” in Journal of Mathematical Physics 57.   American Institute of Physics, March 2016, pp. 032 701–1–21.
  12. C. D. Persis and N. Monshizadeh, “Bregman storage functions for microgrid control,” in IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.   IEEE, Jan. 2018, pp. 53–68.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.